Channel
@The_Dudes_Calls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
29subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001699462902 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @The_Dudes_Calls |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 9 January 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 7 times, most recently 7 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/The_Dudes_Calls |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:08 | 29 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 30 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:41 | 30 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 January 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 April 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2022 to 3 April 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🐊✅ FLASH GIVE AWAY ✅🐊 100 cro to a random person who votes for Baby Croge on Jacks poll Simply screen shot after your vote and DM @babycroge We will pick a winner in 2 hours Link to poll https://t.me/c/1786672434/78626
Hope you guys all aped It did over 60x ATH and still running strong
Hasn’t launched Watch for it It’ll be huge !! Safe team ready to push it for the long run t.me/overpoweredportal
Just launched Safe transparent dev https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x531e6abf06bda81c5b9453ce0e23dcfdbbeb769f https://t.me/teddyswap
Just launched 100 percent safe dev https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x58a11908f0fd9b0020aafbcedfd95fd4b17a27e6 https://t.me/lilpinkpussycats
Shilling Queen launched a degen just for fun Low liq and 100 percent safe https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x15fbc75b88bd61a68d15d3d6acce4681f4cbd0a7 https://t.me/kittengambles
Elon tweet Idk shit about it but it’s mooning https://poocoin.app/tokens/0xeaeef1656c74beaf698cde27951b06e6fc7b86c3 https://t.me/starshiptomars_official
Safe dev just launched Low cap Another ponzi play Read about the taxes it’s really cool https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x5e6b75f5d67733aacf7b82c729bc52bb9b667f7b https://t.me/ponzinuverse
Safe Dev Low cap https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x338e1bad15411d02b1dc15489df95670f2fef4ab https://t.me/placeholdernamebsc
UPDATE ON PURE PONZI still going strong Dipped low but diamond dicks just reinvested then Dev is safe and the community is growing Remember the key is to hold and just profit off the rewards https://t.me/pureponzi https://poocoin.app/tokens/0xe91191fc3ad04127465837f1bec5c283f319b790
This is mooning The rewards are so fat there’s no point in selling The tax is 49 percent with 40 percent in Busd rewards (You can’t us PCS since the tax is so high) I aped and I’m going to sleep just to collect the rewards 😎 https://poocoin.app/tokens/0xe91191fc3ad04127465837f1bec5c283f319b790 https://t.me/pureponzi
👍1
Just launched Dev is on VC He’s known around so seems safe Easy gains from here https://poocoin.app/tokens/0xbf62e2f93b54bb2334fabaedbaffb77a4f10c73c https://t.me/ItachiUchiha_BSC
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @The_Dudes_Calls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@The_Dudes_Calls named 13 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Dudes calls” (@The_Dudes_Calls), 29 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/The_Dudes_Calls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.