Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The ДОКУМЕНТАЛІСТ

Channel

The ДОКУМЕНТАЛІСТ

@The_Documentalist

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

20,175subscribers

-38 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001253896625
TypeChannel
Username@The_Documentalist
Created23 April 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/The_Documentalist

Growth

20,17520,32220,248.57 August 2026 — 20,213 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,213 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,225 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,245 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,264 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,279 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,304 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,316 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,322 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,317 subscribers16 August 2026 — 20,236 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,228 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,226 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,213 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,190 subscribers22 August 2026 — 20,187 subscribers25 August 2026 — 20,175 subscribers7 August 202625 August 2026
17 measurements spanning 18 days, net -38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,153–20,344 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 11:1220,175-12
22 Aug 2026, 23:4920,187-3
20 Aug 2026, 12:4620,190-23
19 Aug 2026, 12:2320,213-13
18 Aug 2026, 14:0520,226-2
17 Aug 2026, 17:1520,228-8
16 Aug 2026, 08:4220,236-81
14 Aug 2026, 22:3820,317-5
13 Aug 2026, 17:1620,322+6
12 Aug 2026, 19:3320,316+12
11 Aug 2026, 21:4320,304+25
10 Aug 2026, 20:1220,279+15
9 Aug 2026, 23:3620,264+19
9 Aug 2026, 02:1120,245+20
8 Aug 2026, 03:5220,225+12
7 Aug 2026, 10:0020,213no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:4820,213first reading

Engagement

39 posts held, back to 17 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.4%
avg views ÷ 20,175 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,930
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 39 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held39 (17 June 202625 August 2026)
Views total154,140
Reactions total4,890
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Aug 2026, 21:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,190
Videos
311
Links
534

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
7m 40s
Average length
1m 55s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7,875 reactions across 39 posts, in 45 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,83736.0%
🔥1,25015.9%
99212.6%
😁5416.87%
🤮4796.08%
😢2903.68%
🤬2162.74%
🤯1882.39%
😱1722.18%
🙏1622.06%
🤣1281.63%
🤔1161.47%
🍓720.914%
💯690.876%
🤡430.546%
🥰410.521%
❤‍🔥390.495%
🙈360.457%
🤷‍♂260.33%
🎉210.267%
25 further kinds1571.99%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,875reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC≈2,340 views125 reactionsread 25 August 2026

Головним «свідком» став Іван Варфоломєєв, якого оголосили японським та американським агентом. Два роки його допитував полковник Михайло Рюмін, отримуючи дедалі неймовірніші свідчення про змову, американських генералів, шпигунів і підготовку ядерної атаки на Москву. Проблема була лише в одному: факти не сходилися. Деякі «учасники змови» фізично не могли брати участь в операції, а американський військовий аташе, якому

🔥66👍35🤯185😁1

25 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC≈2,290 views109 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

У 1950-х совєтські спецслужби розслідували справу про нібито американський план ядерного удару по Кремлю. За версією слідства, п’ять пристроїв мали підірвати просто над будівлею, що спричинило б велетенський викид теплової енергії, яка «разрушит Кремль целиком и сожжет все живое». Відповідно увесь совєтський уряд мав загинути. Після чого США начебто планували оголосити війну СССР. За сценарієм, представленим викрит

😁84🤨11🤔64🥰3👍1

24 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC≈3,360 views301 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Forwarded from @ArchivartifactsVideo

Появилося дуже цікаве відео зі Львова 23.08.1991 року. Повалення пам'ятника леніну, його ж волочать коридорами теперішньої ОДА., розмови зі львівськими російськомовними мусорами тощо. Сподобався один момент. Хлопці заходять у якусь залу для засідань (не впізнав де це) і бачать великий бюст леніну. За кадром: "ніхє...а собі". ))) Що сталося далі. Дивіться 📜Канал "Архівні Артефакти"

🔥20673🎉13🤔4💅3👍1😁1

24 Aug 2026, 07:40 UTC≈4,080 views154 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇦 У День Незалежності підтримай тих, хто обрав Україну Сьогодні ми дякуємо тим, завдяки кому Україна залишається вільною. Серед них — бійці Міжнародного Легіону. Люди з різних країн, які приїхали в Україну й обрали захищати її разом з нами. Вони тримають фронт і виконують бойові завдання. Але для цього потрібні спорядження, техніка та постійна підтримка. 🎯 Ціль: 1 200 000 грн 🔗 Посилання на збір: https://send.m

103👍41💘5🫡3🍓1🥰1

22 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC≈4,050 views125 reactionsread 25 August 2026

https://youtu.be/h17qTMksTY8?si=MY6LyqmjjpsKt3WV

👍100🔥25

22 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC≈4,310 views128 reactionsread 25 August 2026

🍺 Як пиво змінило Львів? Від першої броварні до сучасного крафту https://youtu.be/RniTyq9zkOM

79👍40🍾7❤‍🔥2

20 Aug 2026, 06:48 UTC≈5,440 views278 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Forwarded from @allgolobutskyVideo

Шарапов звітує Брежнєву)

🤮213😁43🙉11🙈32💊2💩2👍1

19 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC≈6,740 views138 reactionsread 25 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oq-gFYR-GwI&t=6s

👍11223🔥2🤩1

19 Aug 2026, 05:30 UTC≈6,260 views216 reactionsread 25 August 2026

35 років тому почався путч ГКЧП. 19 серпня 1991 року група найвищих посадовців СССР спробувала усунути від влади Міхаіла Горбачова. Навіщо вони це зробили? Напередодні мав бути підписаний новий Союзний договір, який передавав значну частину влади республікам. Для совєтських консерваторів це означало фактичний демонтаж СССР. Горбачова ізолювали в Криму, Янаєв оголосив себе «виконувачем обов’язків президента», а до

👍17126👏11💯7🎉1

18 Aug 2026, 08:24 UTC≈5,350 views323 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Video

Цікаве відео опублікував Криміналіст про Донецьк у нульові.

🤮243🙈33👍16😁12🥴10💩4😢4😐1

17 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC≈5,190 views135 reactionsread 25 August 2026

Працюєш-працюєш, а воно - Сталін рідний тато...

🤯93🤬31😱101

17 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC≈5,570 views312 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Forwarded from @babel

📈 7% українців вважають, що Сталін він був «великим вождем», ще 62% проти такого твердження, свідчать дані опитування КМІС. Також 3% українців відповіли, що позитивно ставляться до Сталіна, 27% — байдуже, ще 57% ставляться негативно. У 2023 році до нього позитивно ставилися 4%, ще 61% ставилися негативно. У Росії у 2026 році до Сталіна позитивно ставляться 59% росіян. Також там 56% людей вважають його «великим вожд

🤬179🤯77🤔19😱12👍76💊4🤡4

Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @The_Documentalist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,109,523 of 1,603,893entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The ДОКУМЕНТАЛІСТ” (@The_Documentalist), 20,175 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/The_Documentalist.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.