Channel
@TheWritersFeelings
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
117subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001753558530 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TheWritersFeelings |
| Description | Profile pictures 💞💞 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TheWritersFeelings |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 117 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 117 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
13 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 61.5% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 15.4% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 15.4% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 7.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2025 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
It’s exhausting, isn’t it? Walking around with a smile when inside, you’re falling apart. People see you, they think you’re okay, they think you’ve got it all together, but they have no idea how much you’ve cried, how much you’ve broken down behind closed doors. The depth of your pain, the heaviness of your heart, it’s invisible to them. But God knows. Every tear, every sleepless night, every silent scream into the …
❤2
"My father is a rose and roses are beautifully shaped with thorns. No matter how fear may possess me, he finds the remedy for me. His words may sometimes be cruel but his presence is my one and only cure. He is the sun when the light is on The moon when it's blue and dark, The mother when I am found weeping The comfort when it's time for grieving."
❤2
“There is no such thing as epic love. I thought I was blessed, I thought I could love and I could embrace that kind of power I thought we were something extraordinary, I thought we were the stars in the galaxy.. and that everyone else was a mere rock swimming in the galaxy I even overheard the moon whispering (he was jealous) because we bloomed. But the love was not epic The bond was not magical The stars were the ar…
Some people don’t hear you until your silence becomes louder than your words. You can explain your boundaries gently, clearly, even lovingly — but the truth is, some won’t take them seriously until they’re faced with the reality that you’re no longer available to be walked over. It’s not that they didn’t understand your limits — it’s that they never thought you’d actually enforce them. And when you finally do, when y…
❤1
“Sometimes, I wish I could read your mind to find out how you feel about me.” ✨♣
❤2
Better appreciate my kindness,even I’m afraid of my dark side.
Be a man who proves that not all men are the same. @TheWritersFeelings
What is the difference between : I like you. I love you. Beautifully answered by Someone: “When you like a flower, you just pluck it. But when you love a flower, you water it daily.” One who understand this, understand life! — Osho
You really can't 😎
When you make it, keep tye same perspective.👽✨
“I feel sick, You make me feel sick because I can’t listen to a song, or watch a movie, or read a couple of lines without having you intruding my thoughts, And I hate it. You are not worthy of my affection. why on earth did I fell for you of all people? Of all this lousy population?.. why does it have to be you? I am desperate, not for a touch but for a moment of solitude .. without having you crossing my mind.. How …
😭1
When you can't control what's happening, focus on controlling how you respond.😉
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TheWritersFeelings. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 970,463 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“THE WRITERS FEELING 💞💞” (@TheWritersFeelings), 117 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheWritersFeelings.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.