Channel

The Write Path

@TheWritePath

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

881subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1002236493781
Type	Channel
Username	@TheWritePath
Description	The Right Path Of Writing🖋️ @Sina21_p @TheWritePath21
Created	Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	8 August 2026
Last confirmed live	8 August 2026
Measurements held	2
On Telegram	t.me/TheWritePath

Growth

2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 880–882 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
8 Aug 2026, 01:06	881	no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:27	881	first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 3 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos: 9
Links: 48

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

156 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
❤	45	28.8%
🔥	45	28.8%
💯	41	26.3%
👍	22	14.1%
⚡	3	1.92%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 156reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 February 2025 to 2 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Oct 2025, 08:46 UTC999 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Forwarded from @ResearchGroup1401Photo

#اخبارـپژوهشی 🔗 9 پروپوزال، در همکاری مشترک تیم های ریسرچ کلاب، The Write Path و همکارانی از دانشگاه علوم پزشکی ارومیه در روزهای اخیر کداخلاق دریافت نمودند. 💥اساتید این پروژه ها، دکتر سعید رضوی دیزجی و دکتر رحیم اصغری از فوق تخصص های خون و آنکولوژی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی ارومیه می باشند. 📌 در این مطالعات با حجم نمونه ی حدود سه هزار بیمار سعی داریم به صورت توصیفی و تحلیلی در مورد 9 سرطان مختلف (شامل سرطان های ریه، پستا…

💯8❤4

18 Jul 2025, 21:13 UTC≈1,130 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

⏳ تنها ۳ روز تا پایان مهلت ثبت‌نام کارگاه تخصصی «ایمیل آکادمیک و ارتباط مؤثر با اساتید» باقی مونده! 🎯 فرصتی بی‌نظیر برای یادگیری مهارتی که می‌تونه مسیر علمی‌ت رو متحول کنه؛ از دستش نده! 🔥👨‍💻📩

🔥4👍2

27 Jun 2025, 14:17 UTC≈1,200 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Forwarded from @ResearchGroup1401Photo

ری سرچ کلاب و The Write Path با افتخار برگزار می کنند: «کارگاه تخصصی ایمیل آکادمیک و ارتباط موثر با اساتید» 👨‍🏫 مدرس : دکتر عرفان شیخ بهایی 🥇 پزشک عمومی 🥈نویسنده بیش از 50 مقاله علمی 🥉بیش از 900 سایتیشن 🏅داور مجلات بین المللی 🗓 روز و ساعت برگزاری : دوشنبه 30‌تیر/ساعت 21 📌روش های پرداخت هزینه به چه صورت هست؟ ⬅️هزینه ی وبینار 300 هزار تومان خواهد بود و میتوانید یکی از تخفیف های زیر را برای ثبت نام انتخاب کنید : 1⃣…

❤5🔥2👍1

8 May 2025, 14:49 UTC≈1,340 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Photo

🎓🧬 پروپوزال و پایان‌نامه‌ات رو بسپار به SciPro! گروه SciPro با تیمی از دانشجویان و فارغ‌التحصیلان برتر علوم پزشکی، همراه مطمئن تو در مسیر نگارش علمی‌ست. ✍️ خدمات ما ویژه دانشجویان علوم پزشکی: 🔹 نگارش پروپوزال و پایان‌نامه برای تمامی مقاطع (کارشناسی، ارشد، دکترا) و تمامی رشته‌های گروه علوم پزشکی 🔹 ثبت پروپوزال در سامانه کارآزمایی بالینی ایران (IRCT) 🔹 نگارش و ویرایش مقالات داخلی (همایشی) و بین‌المللی (ISI) 🔹 ادیت ن…

🔥3❤2👍1

7 Apr 2025, 08:25 UTC≈12,100 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Photo

📢 دوره جامع مقاله نویسی: The Write Path & Research Club برگزار می‌کند 🎓 دوره جامع مقاله‌نویسی با همکاری دانشگاه‌های برتر آمریکا 📚 آموزش حرفه‌ای مقاله‌نویسی با منتورینگ اختصاصی و همراهی رزیدنت‌های دانشگاه‌های برتر آمریکا ✅ راهنمایی گام‌به‌گام از ایده‌پردازی تا انتشار مقاله ✅ چاپ مقاله با افیلیشن رسمی دانشگاه‌های برتر آمریکا ✅ منتورینگ اختصاصی توسط رزیدنت‌های دانشگاه‌های پیشرو در علوم پزشکی و تحقیقاتی ✅ انتشار مقالا…

❤4💯2🔥2👍1

5 Apr 2025, 06:33 UTC≈1,060 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Understanding the Structure of Systematic Review Articles in Scientific Writing Systematic reviews are comprehensive, methodologically rigorous studies that summarize existing evidence on a specific research question. They follow a standardized format to ensure transparency, reproducibility, and objectivity in evidence synthesis. 🔹 Introduction – Outlines the research question, its importance, and the rationale for…

❤2👍2💯2🔥2

31 Mar 2025, 19:02 UTC895 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Understanding the Use of EndNote in Reference Management EndNote is a powerful reference management software widely used by researchers, students, and academics to organize citations, manage bibliographies, and streamline the writing process. It helps users store, organize, and cite sources efficiently in research articles, theses, and systematic reviews. 🔹 Importing References – Users can import citations from dat…

💯3❤2👍2🔥2

27 Mar 2025, 21:51 UTC979 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Understanding the Use of Rayyan in Systematic Reviews Rayyan is an online tool designed to facilitate the screening process in systematic reviews, making title/abstract and full-text screening more efficient. It offers features like blinding, labeling, and AI-assisted decision-making, helping researchers streamline their workflow. 🔹 Title & Abstract Screening – Reviewers screen studies based on inclusion/exclusion …

💯7❤2👍2

23 Mar 2025, 13:45 UTC≈1,030 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

📌 Understanding the Key Stages in Systematic Review Articles Systematic reviews follow a structured methodology to ensure comprehensive and unbiased evidence synthesis. The core steps include: 🔹 Title and Abstract Screening – Identifying relevant studies based on predefined criteria. 🔹 Full-Text Screening – Evaluating the eligibility of selected studies. 🔹 Data Extraction – Collecting key information from included …

💯4🔥4❤3

18 Mar 2025, 20:49 UTC924 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

📌 Understanding the Conclusion Section in Scientific Writing The Conclusion section summarizes key findings, highlights the significance of the study, and provides final remarks. A strong conclusion should reinforce the main points without introducing new data. 🔹 Summary of Key Findings – Restate the main results concisely. 🔹 Significance of the Study – Explain the broader implications of the findings. 🔹 Future Dir…

⚡3💯3❤2🔥2

15 Mar 2025, 16:14 UTC853 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

📌 Understanding the Discussion Section in Scientific Writing The Discussion section is where researchers interpret their findings, compare them with existing literature, and explore their implications, limitations, and future research directions. This section should clearly explain how the results contribute to the field and address potential biases or weaknesses. 🔹 Interpretation of Findings – Explain the signific…

❤4💯3🔥3

13 Mar 2025, 14:43 UTC687 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

📌 Understanding the Results Section in Scientific Writing The Results section presents the key findings of a study in a clear and structured manner, using text, tables, and figures. This section should focus on the data without interpretation, ensuring that results are presented objectively. 🔹 Descriptive Statistics – Summarizes sample characteristics. 🔹 Primary Findings – Reports outcomes based on study objectives…

❤3💯3🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @TheWritePath. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Research Club
@ResearchGroup1401 · 2,7262 posts

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

Research Club
@ResearchGroup1401 · 2,7264 posts

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Handles this channel named that no longer answer

Dead references: 2; handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone: 0; we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive: 2; vacant every time we have ever looked

@TheWritePath named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.

Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.

Never seen alive

References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.

@thewritepath21
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026

@scipro21
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The Write Path” (@TheWritePath), 881 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheWritePath.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.