Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

The Virtuous Mission 🇺🇸🇷🇺

@TheVirtuousMission

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

158subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002401747541
TypeChannel
Username@TheVirtuousMission
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TheVirtuousMission

Growth

1589 Aug 2026, 06:46 — 158 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 17:02 — 158 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 06:469 Aug 2026, 17:02
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 157–159 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 17:02158no change
9 Aug 2026, 06:46158first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.8%
avg views ÷ 158 subscribers
Avg views / post
40.7
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (5 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total814
Reactions total17
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 06:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

17 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
847.1%
💔423.5%
❤‍🔥317.6%
👍15.88%
💯15.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 04:40 UTC15 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

У меня есть загадка, которую я отчаянно хочу разгадать. В Варшаве я ел шаурму. Она там по всей Восточной Европе на каждом углу. Но это была не просто шаурма — это была лучшая шаурма в моей жизни. У них там какой-то другой соус, не такой, как в любом месте в Ульяновске. Я обязан выяснить, что это. Обязан достать его и привезти с собой в Россию. Это настолько вкусно. Почему варшавская шаурма настолько лучше? Я в полно

1

Signed Толмач

9 Aug 2026, 04:39 UTC15 viewsread 9 August 2026

I have a mystery I'm desperate to solve. In Warsaw I had shawarma. It's all over eastern Europe. But this wasn't just any shawarma It was the best shawarma I've ever had. They used some different sauce than is used at any place in Ulyanovsk. I must find out what it is. I must get some and bring it to Russia with me. It's so good. Why is Warsaw shawarma so much better? I'm so confused. What is this magic? Seriously,

8 Aug 2026, 16:22 UTC42 viewsread 9 August 2026

В Америке многое идёт совсем не так. Это заместитель комиссара по общественной безопасности города Маунт-Вернон. Вся её работа — обеспечивать безопасность людей в городе. Её сын — гангстер. Она везла своего сына в машине, пока он стрелял из окна по конкурирующей банде рядом с городским зданием суда. Я даже не понимаю, как читать эти слова и осознавать, насколько это безумно. Представьте, что начальник полиции вашего

Signed Толмач

8 Aug 2026, 16:22 UTC28 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Many things are not well in America. This is the Deputy Commissioner of Public Safety for the city of Mount Vernon. Her entire job is to keep people in the city safe. Her son is a gangster. She drove her sun as he shot a gun out the car window at a rival gang near the city courthouse. I don't know how to even read these words and comprehend how insane this is. Imagine the police chief of your city running a drug smu

💔3

8 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC36 viewsread 9 August 2026

Я не фанат того, что Российская Федерация объявляет людей — особенно журналистов — «нежелательными» и запрещает их бизнесу работать в России. Но вы вообще в курсе, что на Западе мы делаем то же самое — только ХУЖЕ? Российская Федерация официально ставит на человеке клеймо «нежелательного» и запрещает ему деятельность. В США и Европе наши страны делают вид, что ничем таким не занимаются, — а потом делают это втихую.

Signed Толмач

8 Aug 2026, 09:36 UTC33 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

I"m not a fan of the Russian Federation declaring people, especially journalists, "undesirable people" and prohibiting their businesses from operating inside of Russia. But do you know that in the West we do the same thing, but WORSE? The Russian federation formally brands people as undesirable and bans them from operation. In the USA and Europe, our countries pretend they don't do this- and then they do it secretly

💔1

8 Aug 2026, 04:43 UTC36 viewsread 9 August 2026

В США полно рабочих мест. Так почему же столько американцев без работы? Потому что все рабочие места уходят иностранцам. Вообще-то компаниям не должно быть позволено так делать. Для найма иностранных работников нужны специальные разрешения. Но каждый месяц правительство выдаёт сотни тысяч таких разрешений, потому что иностранцы готовы работать за меньшие деньги, чем американцы. Они соглашаются на низкую зарплату как

Signed Толмач

8 Aug 2026, 04:42 UTC35 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

The USA has plenty of jobs. So why are there so many unemployed Americans? Because all the jobs are going to foreigners. Companies are not supposed to be allowed to do this. There are special permits required to hire foreign workers. But every month the government issues hundreds of thousands of these permits, because foreign workers will work for lower wages than Americans. They will work for less as part of the d

7 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC38 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

На каждую стрессовую штуку в России есть одна или несколько вещей, за которые я ей безумно благодарен. Иногда об этом, конечно, забываешь: проблемы-то вот они, прямо перед носом, а всё, от чего Россия меня спасла, осталось где-то далеко. Уже целый год мне не приходилось иметь дело с людьми, ноющими о том, что белые мужчины — зло. Свидания, на которые я ходил, стали куда приятнее. Даже когда языковой барьер высокий,

1👍1

Signed Толмач

7 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTC36 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

For every stressful thing about Russia, there's one or more things I'm so grateful for. It's natural to forget this sometimes, because the problems are right here in my face, but the things Russia has saved me from are far away. It has been a whole year since I've had to deal with someone complaining about white men being evil. The dates I've been on have been far more enjoyable. Even when there's a high language ba

❤‍🔥3

6 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC49 viewsread 9 August 2026

Большие новости на этой неделе. Президент подписал новый закон, который меняет порядок иммиграции. До дальнейших распоряжений любой иностранец, который был осуждён за какое угодно преступление у себя на родине, больше не сможет получить вид на жительство в России. Как человек из страны, где огромная проблема с преступлениями, которые совершают иммигранты, скажу: на бумаге звучит просто отлично. Но тут упускают один

Signed Толмач

6 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC49 viewsread 9 August 2026

So Big news this week. The president has signed a new law that amends the process of immigration. Until further notice, any Foreigner who has been convicted of any crime at all in his or her home country will no longer be allowed as residence permit inside Russia. As someone who comes from a country with a massive problem with immigrants committing crimes, this sounds really great on paper. But it overlooks the fact

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TheVirtuousMission. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,149,915 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The Virtuous Mission 🇺🇸🇷🇺” (@TheVirtuousMission), 158 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheVirtuousMission.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.