Some people show love and some criticize, idc either way SMD.

Channel
Solitaire♦️
@TheSolitairePrestige
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,312subscribers
-327 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001763658798 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TheSolitairePrestige |
| Description | Top Tier Genuine and Organic Prestige Channel | 🤖 BOT FREE Diamond Hands 💎 Whales 🐋 Parabolic Apes 🦍 Celebrity and Marketing Plug @Omz19 ◇♤♡♧ Official X https://x.com/crypt_omar |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TheSolitairePrestige |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 23:19 | 9,312 | -11 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 04:20 | 9,323 | -3 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 14:31 | 9,326 | -19 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 22:17 | 9,345 | -11 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 07:27 | 9,356 | -11 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 13:06 | 9,367 | -21 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:40 | 9,388 | -23 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 21:20 | 9,411 | -13 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 11:59 | 9,424 | -4 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 16:35 | 9,428 | +67 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 16:01 | 9,361 | -63 |
| 24 Sept 2026, 20:38 | 9,424 | -48 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 15:59 | 9,472 | -16 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:58 | 9,488 | -27 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 05:38 | 9,515 | -12 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:56 | 9,527 | -19 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:27 | 9,546 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 9,553 | -15 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 9,568 | +21 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:38 | 9,547 | first reading |
Engagement
322 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.09%
- avg views ÷ 9,312 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 660
- 57 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 58
- of 322 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 322 (5 August 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 37,634 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 11:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,010
- Videos
- ≈265
- Links
- ≈3,740
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 12s
- Average length
- 6s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 58 posts held from the last 30 days (3.45%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
We have way more wins here than losses. I think just on 2-3 plays that I’ve shared in the past month could’ve easily made early buyers 100k plus in profits. Anyways, we focus on even more wins and bigger ones.
https://x.com/crypt_omar/status/2120481312159248645
$STANK just candled to 5m. 🔥 Officially a 100x call. 💨 Thanks for playing.
Be careful of fomo buying into memes on Elysium. It’s currently full of honeypots. Make sure you dyor before buying.
qjhWVdryERmzBUcPgiFqb6icRndTRkP2PzYUEMmpump
STANK whales will all see the domain and narrative. Top holders are all posting the domain. 👀
I found a Solana narrative. Seems extremely bullish if it gets attention. Elon puchased a domain in 2019 and it has a STONKS meme posted on the website. Paired to $SPCX. qjhWVdryERmzBUcPgiFqb6icRndTRkP2PzYUEMmpump https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1091480239891345408
CZ interaction incoming. 🐶 https://x.com/bentodar/status/2119701782335005101
75x call on $STANK! 🔥 Only back to back wins on Solitaire.
Remember we said yesterday that BNB SZN will start from an Elon narrative? It’s happening. 0x0cee7a04355b2e2d7248d9566db8889cf44f7777
Chinese always sell before they sleep, it’s a known and normal fact. I added more MARS INU because BNB desperately needs a PvE meme to bring back the on chain hype. 0x0cee7a04355b2e2d7248d9566db8889cf44f7777
Showing the 12 most recent of 322 posts we hold for @TheSolitairePrestige. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
As a regular trader with little to no insider information, where have you had more success making money: Presales or normal Stealth launches?
- Presales38%
- Stealth launches64%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 322 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@HardSnipe · 11,65510 postsGOAT
@GOAT_BNB · 5535 postsCrypto4Calls ~ No Degens ~ Safu Only
@crypto4calls · 473 postsAnt Calls
@AntCall · 12 postsSolitaire CASINO
@TheSolitaireCasino · 2672 postsJoz CALLs
@jozcalls · 152 postsThe ApeFather’s Calls
@Apefathercalls_official · 91 postBuzz Coin Official
@Buzzcoin_Channel · 481 postCroki Coin Announcements
@CrokiAnnouncements · 411 postDEGEN MALLU
@Degenmallu007 · 361 postHustleBot Announcements
@HustleBotAnnouncements · 621 postJustice Calls
@JusticeCalls · 1,7931 postKabosuCEO Announcements
@KabosuCEONews · 271 postOrlando Chain Channel
@OrlandoChain_Ann · 671 postRocket Calls🚀💎🌚
@R0cketcalls · 41 postSage’s Senders
@SagesSenders · 1581 postUniverse Bet Announcement
@UniverseBetAnnouncement · 61 postFegrow Channel
@fegrow_channel · 1,8971 postMAGICDOGE CHANNEL
@magicdogechannel · 261 postMonkeyBusiness Annoucement Channel
@monkeybusinessannoucement · 3221 postSeans Crypto Diamonds
@seansdiamonds · 561 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@HardSnipe · 11,6552 postsMemeDaddy’s
@MEMEDADDYS · 1,4362 postsFlyxes on x's
@flyxes_spaces · 5032 postsBNB CHAIN GEMS 💎
@BNBCHAINGEMS · 3,7411 postBrother Project Exhibit channel
@BrothersProjectExhibit · 5,2911 postNew Listings Feed
@NewListingsFeed · 59,1781 postPow's Gem Calls
@PowsGemCalls · 111,0301 postXM Crypto News 🔥📈🚨💰
@Xmcryptonews · 78,9101 postYoon's Printer 🖨
@YOONBSC · 4,7301 postCaptain cooks
@captainlabs · 6,2261 postCRYPTO NEWS
@cryptocurrency_media · 63,6721 postMarcell's Trenches
@marcellcooks · 46,9211 postMo Crypto Plays
@mocryptoplays · 7811 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@spydefi · 41,86810 postsMAGICDOGE CHANNEL
@magicdogechannel · 263 postsUniverse Bet Announcement
@UniverseBetAnnouncement · 62 postsWIZARD SCAN Live
@WizardScan · 22,4792 postsBig Cat Crypto Channel
@bigcatcryptochannel · 231 postCheesus Calls | MULTI-CHAIN
@CheesusCalls · 1,6881 postDINGDING.WTF MEMES
@DINGDINGWTF · 11 postFlokiTer AI Announcement | NFTs ⌛️
@FlokiTerAnnouncement · 451 postGotham News
@Gotham_N_ews · 111 postHero World Announcements
@heroworld_ann · 931 postKOLScreener
@kolscreener · 14,3511 postMagnum Services
@MagnumServices · 31 postDaily Shill
@Martinshiller · 21 postPink Bonk | Channel
@PinkBonkChannel · 61 postSolitaire CASINO
@TheSolitaireCasino · 2671 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@GimmeAI · 25,112
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 12 September 2026
@kobascalls · 30,240
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 3 September 2026
@Caesars_Calls · 38,126
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 30 August 2026
@mad_apes_call · 78,667
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
@MakeMoneyWithMattTG · 28,194
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 10 September 2026
@MiniDurovv · 114,172
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 22 August 2026
@MineGems · 20,861
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
@CryptoHylos · 1,436,153
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 August 2026
@gusevself · 50,310
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 20 August 2026
@amurblg1 · 44,817
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 27 August 2026
@tethera_io · 46,083
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 23 August 2026
@jogoWJ · 63,707
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 3 September 2026
@anyclass_bodymind · 174,009
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 12 August 2026
@sarmayedigital · 65,895
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 8 September 2026
@msk7days · 2,201,701
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 10 August 2026
@bruiserscalls · 30,589
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Solitaire♦️” (@TheSolitairePrestige), 9,312 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheSolitairePrestige.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.