https://x.com/crypt_omar/status/2093577684496560278

Channel
Solitaire♦️
@TheSolitairePrestige
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,424subscribers
-215 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001763658798 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TheSolitairePrestige |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TheSolitairePrestige |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Sept 2026, 20:38 | 9,424 | -48 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 15:59 | 9,472 | -16 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:58 | 9,488 | -27 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 05:38 | 9,515 | -12 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:56 | 9,527 | -19 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:27 | 9,546 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 9,553 | -15 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 9,568 | +21 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:38 | 9,547 | -12 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 10:43 | 9,559 | -7 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 9,566 | -56 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 9,622 | -15 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 9,637 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:38 | 9,638 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:00 | 9,639 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 9,639 | first reading |
Engagement
264 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.34%
- avg views ÷ 9,424 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 315
- 12 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 12
- of 264 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 264 (5 August 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,779 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 05:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 12s
- Average length
- 6s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
https://x.com/crypt_omar/status/2093573325020975147
Priceless is next.
0x7d3b5e20210a4a4a70de8252337992d7ad2d7777
Let me tell you what’s next. 👀
Over 40x from my thesis on Saturn in less than 6 hours. Everything I mention becomes a major hit.
BonkGuy also confirms the bull run will be on BNBChain. 🐂 https://x.com/crypt_omar/status/2093419597441757418
RFLIX and CHILL. 📈
Bitcoin is priceless and it’s not so easy to accumulate $BTC at this price for some people. $PRICELESS solves that problem, Hold a meme and earn Bitcoin while sleeping. This is the retail onboarding coin of this bull run. 🐂 0x7d3b5e20210a4a4a70de8252337992d7ad2d7777
Bagworkers support bagworkers, That’s how we gonna make it in 2026. #Priceless szn.
I will bid and shill in a bit
Pumped notEzzy’s chart. 📈 In return he’s going to ape a bag in $PRICELESS and support. https://x.com/crypt_omar/status/2093317757391741365
Showing the 12 most recent of 264 posts we hold for @TheSolitairePrestige. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@HardSnipe · 11,88310 postsGOAT
@GOAT_BNB · 5625 postsCrypto4Calls ~ No Degens ~ Safu Only
@crypto4calls · 303 postsAnt Calls
@AntCall · 12 postsSolitaire CASINO
@TheSolitaireCasino · 2732 postsJoz CALLs
@jozcalls · 152 postsThe ApeFather’s Calls
@Apefathercalls_official · 91 postBuzz Coin Official
@Buzzcoin_Channel · 501 postCroki Coin Announcements
@CrokiAnnouncements · 411 postDEGEN MALLU
@Degenmallu007 · 391 postHustleBot Announcements
@HustleBotAnnouncements · 621 postJustice Calls
@JusticeCalls · 1,7921 postKabosuCEO Announcements
@KabosuCEONews · 281 postOrlando Chain Channel
@OrlandoChain_Ann · 671 postRocket Calls🚀💎🌚
@R0cketcalls · 41 postSage’s Senders
@SagesSenders · 1681 postUniverse Bet Announcement
@UniverseBetAnnouncement · 71 postFegrow Channel
@fegrow_channel · 4,3461 postMAGICDOGE CHANNEL
@magicdogechannel · 271 postMonkeyBusiness Annoucement Channel
@monkeybusinessannoucement · 3311 postSeans Crypto Diamonds
@seansdiamonds · 561 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@HardSnipe · 11,8832 postsMemeDaddy’s
@MEMEDADDYS · 1,5512 postsFlyxes on x's
@flyxes_spaces · 5092 postsBNB CHAIN GEMS 💎
@BNBCHAINGEMS · 3,9001 postBrother Project Exhibit channel
@BrothersProjectExhibit · 5,2751 postNew Listings Feed
@NewListingsFeed · 59,2091 postPow's Gem Calls
@PowsGemCalls · 112,9061 postXM Crypto News 🔥📈🚨💰
@Xmcryptonews · 79,6491 postYoon's Printer 🖨
@YOONBSC · 4,7711 postCaptain cooks
@captainlabs · 6,4371 postCRYPTO NEWS
@cryptocurrency_media · 62,3851 postMarcell's Trenches
@marcellcooks · 47,6501 postMo Crypto Plays
@mocryptoplays · 7361 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@spydefi · 42,5657 postsMAGICDOGE CHANNEL
@magicdogechannel · 273 postsUniverse Bet Announcement
@UniverseBetAnnouncement · 72 postsBig Cat Crypto Channel
@bigcatcryptochannel · 241 postCheesus Calls | MULTI-CHAIN
@CheesusCalls · 1,7261 postDINGDING.WTF MEMES
@DINGDINGWTF · 11 postFlokiTer AI Announcement | NFTs ⌛️
@FlokiTerAnnouncement · 481 postGotham News
@Gotham_N_ews · 101 postHero World Announcements
@heroworld_ann · 951 postMagnum Services
@MagnumServices · 41 postDaily Shill
@Martinshiller · 21 postPink Bonk | Channel
@PinkBonkChannel · 61 postSolitaire CASINO
@TheSolitaireCasino · 2731 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@GimmeAI · 26,260
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 12 September 2026
@kobascalls · 32,020
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 3 September 2026
@Caesars_Calls · 39,248
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 30 August 2026
@mad_apes_call · 80,345
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
@MakeMoneyWithMattTG · 27,951
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 10 September 2026
@MiniDurovv · 126,881
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 22 August 2026
@MineGems · 35,030
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
@CryptoHylos · 1,613,375
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 August 2026
@gusevself · 57,363
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 20 August 2026
@amurblg1 · 45,224
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 27 August 2026
@tethera_io · 50,757
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 23 August 2026
@jogoWJ · 69,626
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 3 September 2026
@anyclass_bodymind · 170,328
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 12 August 2026
@sarmayedigital · 37,468
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 8 September 2026
@msk7days · 2,211,304
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 10 August 2026
@bruiserscalls · 33,241
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Solitaire♦️” (@TheSolitairePrestige), 9,424 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheSolitairePrestige.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.