Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Reddikulus ✶ #VelvetSummer

@TheReddikulus

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

116subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002240465787
TypeChannel
Username@TheReddikulus
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/TheReddikulus

Growth

1166 August 2026 — 116 subscribers9 August 2026 — 116 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 115–117 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 05:17116no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:32116first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 28 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2049.2%
avg views ÷ 116 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,380
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.875%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held17 (28 March 20263 August 2026)
Views total28,525
Reactions total230
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
37
Videos
20
Links
32

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
20s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

327 reactions across 9 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8124.8%
🎉329.79%
💘267.95%
🍓247.34%
❤‍🔥216.42%
🥰216.42%
🤩175.20%
🎄123.67%
💋123.67%
🆒103.06%
🔥103.06%
🦄103.06%
🕊92.75%
😎61.83%
🏆51.53%
🐳51.53%
🍾41.22%
🎃41.22%
👾41.22%
💅30.917%
6 further kinds113.36%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 327reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 28 March 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
23
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 15 we hold a reading for · 40%
Most on one post
12
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TheReddikulus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 March 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC297 views20 reactions12 Starsread 9 August 2026

🐚 velvet tides & sirens —echo: ₍ Velvet Summer ₎ 3-08 • 6p.M!(KST) 🥥🐚 “The ocean has never forgotten their names” 🧜 Beneath the quiet waves, a familiar melody begins to return. Five silhouettes rise with the tide, their voices carried by the sea breeze and moonlit waters, as if the ocean has been waiting to welcome them

8❤‍🔥4🕊3🍓2🎃1🎉1👏1

31 Jul 2026, 18:00 UTC≈3,560 views32 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ 2026. 𝑤𝑖𝑡𝒽﹙tide-reverie.﹚ 𓇼𓈒 of “summer keepsake” seasons ㅤ where the sapphire coastline embraces the quiet dusk, every wave preserves a fleeting memory beneath the endless cerulean sky. 🍸🔅 RV’s⎯⎯magic︐𑆬𑆋𑆭 / .. Surfin' Boy 🌺 every sunset leaves behind a promise that the sea will always welcome those who carry its memories. Beneath the velvet sky

❤‍🔥9💋5🍾3💯3🎃2👾2💘2🤓2

31 Jul 2026, 18:00 UTC≈8,800 views38 reactions2 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ㅤㅤㅤ LUSTER OF JULY, PLUMERIA FLOWERS ( .&’ ) HUSHED CHANT / OCEAN NYMPHS / SUMPTUOUS SUMMER / TUMBLING CREST 🔅⁰³ Tumult-luelling alabaster shore. 🌊 ・ ۫ ♪ Tropical wind undulates like summer's lore, coiling into the snare of sea mythology's thrall. Silhouettes in hush of the midnight &. tide swallows the boy entering the realm of the wardens of the reefs. ㅤ‘⅋‌──SURFBOARDS, FIVE TIDE MONARCH || AND OCEAN HYMNS 🌴 ㅤㅤE

14💘5🥰5🐳3💅3🏆2👾2🎃1

31 Jul 2026, 16:07 UTC644 views37 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

12💋5🍓4💘4🎄3🎉3🆒3🥰2

28 Jul 2026, 09:00 UTC≈8,430 views43 reactions2 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ +🌲𓂋‌‌⃰ㅤCRIMSON⎯⎯RED GESPRÄCHE FÜNF 🄯𝓇𝓋. . *(ᩙ A woodland light 𝑜𝒻 red dynasty beneath the crimson hood ㅤ carved into a fairy-tale ㅤinscription, the altar of light ㅤㅤㅤfrom the Five-petaled Ⱄ ⋆ 𓍊₊ ㅤ꣖ 🧺 ີ ೃᰰ࿔۪۪۪ .. A vagabond along a woodland arc full of conundrums, with a cartridge of courage as their comrade. A scintillant fluorescence waltzing

12💘5🔥5🥰5🦄4🎉3🍓2🎄2

28 Jul 2026, 09:00 UTC≈3,230 views42 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ “Das purpurrote Testament, A Quiet   Legend Woven Beneath The Die Ewigkeit des Waldes⎯⎯⎯Veil.” 🪾:ㅤ)* 𝄒 TIEF IM WALD, Through corridors of ancient timber and velvet-touched winds, five crimson wanderers trace an unseen constellation across the woodland floor. Every whisper carried by the leaves becomes another page of a tale long protected by the forest itself. No echo fades here: it settl

🤩12🕊6🆒4🎄3🏆3💘3😎32

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @TheReddikulus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 9,246 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Morthen : Awakening After The Static.
@GhostOfMorthen · 11,257
5 posts
𖢷 𝗡𝗬𝗢𝗡𝗬𝗔 𝗩𝗘𝗟𝗩𝗘𝗧 ❥
@NYONYAVELVET · 81
5 posts
PAWS BASE.
@PawsFess · 8,374
3 posts
ActFlyFess
@ActFlyFess · 2,869
2 posts
The Klein Paradigm: Bridging Generations Through Design.
@AttireByKlein · 5,267
2 posts
KOMPLEK TUA
@KomplekTua · 151
2 posts
𝕽𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘦 o𝙵 𝕬𝘮𝘪𝘵𝘺 ✶ 𝓣𝚘𝚐𝚎𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚞𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚕 𝔗𝚘𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚛𝚘𝚠
@ReverieOfAmity · 6,505
2 posts
th’ Velvet Summer, UniverSeuL.
@UniverseuL · 176
2 posts
Polaroid Clubs: Arx Elité.
@ArxElite · 886
1 post
Canticle of Heaven's Paradox: Hjërt.
@Hjerts · 6,282
1 post
(OPEN GATE) Memoranda of Peculiar Souls : House for Elmswythe
@HouseForElmswythe · 3,179
1 post
KHERAELD: Blood & Roots.
@KHERAELD · 1,874
1 post
THE NEW WORLD : KWANGYA NATION
@KwangyaNation · 431
1 post
La Mavie Vine: Letter To Ellie.
@LaMavieVine · 5,047
1 post
MELVNOIR: A Tied, Drawn Home.
@Melvnoir · 1,136
1 post
Meowchine is OPEN!
@meowchine · 246
1 post
Família of Mertzlan: The Deep-seated Collapse.
@MertzlanFamilia · 7,033
1 post
NOCTREL: THE HOUSE OF MIDNIGHT OATH.
@Noctrel · 1,210
1 post
The Wendissle Records: “A Secrets In Dusted Ink.”
@OdWendissel · 6,565
1 post
Revenation
@revenations · 155
1 post
SMTOWN🛳️; Kwangya Club
@smtownship · 28
1 post
The Tsesarevich, Nikolovich Brotherhood.
@TheeNikolovich · 2,942
1 post
VERSE OF ARTISTS: Seize The Day Of Chasing Dreams
@VerseOfArtists · 4,983
1 post
YORK—FESS🗽♥️💬
@YorkFess · 1,227
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Reddikulus ✶ #VelvetSummer” (@TheReddikulus), 116 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheReddikulus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.