https://x.com/i/status/2083991959849357792
❤1

Channel
@ThePachRoyale
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
318subscribers
+18 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003106321128 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ThePachRoyale |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ThePachRoyale |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:53 | 318 | +18 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 300 | -5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 305 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 300 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 300 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (8 January 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 86 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
23 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 15 | 65.2% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 21.7% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 13.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 January 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://x.com/i/status/2083991959849357792
❤1
https://x.com/i/status/2071700990102007910
2x 😁😁😁😁
🔥4
$KNOCK is a Solana-powered prediction platform built around major global events, starting with the FIFA World Cup. Our goal is to create a platform where users can predict sporting outcomes, track live probabilities, compete on leaderboards and earn rewards based on accuracy. For the World Cup, users can predict everything from individual match winners and group qualifiers to Golden Boot, Golden Glove, tournament w…
🔥2
Looking good here.
👀 Fresh find $KNOCK ~$50k MC Sports & Crypto Prediction Platform Website live Locked liquidity Risky as hell, but these are the types of plays that can do multiples if the team executes. Only play with what you're willing to lose. CA: HqMdpaFZn9F8WJLdaJqQU1rgMtJgxY9jQ5tSUiLLpump
❤3
Just aped $TRGT and this is still VERY early. This one is still fresh, sitting around sub $1M MC, and from what I’m seeing, this should at least push into the multi-million range if momentum keeps building. Not saying send your life savings into it — but this is exactly the type of play I like when it’s still early and hasn’t fully sent yet. Current MC: around $867K Pair: TRGT / WETH on Base CA: 0x0398eD3BfAbE8334fD3…
🔥2
The last few months showed me exactly how rough this market really is A lot of these coins are not built to be held forever and most of them should be treated as trades unless I clearly say ALPHA HOLD So from now on if I post a coin and I do not clearly say ALPHA HOLD then you should be thinking about taking profits when you see 2x to 3x Best way to play this market right now is simple Sell 80% of your bag and leave …
👍1
70% up from the dip .... 500k next
🔥1
$AC looking like a very clean dip here This gets eaten up fast once the Clanker team starts talking about it and they’ve already interacted with it so I don’t think that takes long at all Still a fresh coin and this looks like a proper reset before the next move Wouldn’t be surprised to see this get bought up hard from here once more eyes come in Good spot in my opinion
🔥1
New Base play I’m aping: $AC (Agent Conductor) I’m entering this one here around $208K MC. Liquidity is sitting around $108K, volume is strong, and this is one of the cleaner AI infrastructure / agent plays I’ve seen on Base recently. A few things that stood out to me: - 15 models across 10 providers - 7 pre-built specialized agents - Web search, URL reader, and code tools already shipped - Custom agent creation …
🔥3
Apologies for being inactive in here for the past few months. I’ve still been active behind the scenes and have aped a few solid plays over the last couple of weeks, including $SHARP, $RALLY, and $CLAWPAY. On average, those ran around 3x. I have mentioned some of them on Twitter, but I didn’t share them in here because of the current market conditions and because I only want to bring higher-conviction setups into …
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ThePachRoyale. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 498,653 of 1,629,452 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Pach Royale 🎰” (@ThePachRoyale), 318 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ThePachRoyale.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.