Channel
@TheOrdinaryTraders
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
256subscribers
-20 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001952371510 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TheOrdinaryTraders |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 27 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TheOrdinaryTraders |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Oct 2026, 23:37 | 256 | -5 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 22:41 | 261 | -9 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 04:00 | 270 | -4 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 10:00 | 274 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:00 | 276 | no change |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 276 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
22 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 31.8% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 31.8% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 13.6% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 13.6% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 4.55% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 4.55% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
اخیرا رو آوردم به بازی کردن «سودوکو» رو سطوح خیلی سختش که تنظیم میکنی عدد درست رو پیدا کردن مثل گشتن دنبال سوزن در انبار کاه می‌مونه..ولی بالاخره پیدا میشه و جدول رو پر میکنم و اون لحظه واقعا حس میکنم در مقابل نمودار های مالی خنده دار بنظر میاد.
❤1👍1
«من خودم را با خستگی تمام از میان این فصل عبور می‌دهم فقط به امید نور کم‌سویی که در دوردست‌ها می‌درخشد.»
❤3
https://youtu.be/6l4mvmtMbqw?si=YJwHvYhWuheUFnDf
هيچ کس از وضع و روزگار خود راضى نيست، اما همه کس از عقل و خرد خود رضايت دارد ...! 📕آنا کارنینا #لئو_تولستوی
👍1
اولین تاثیرِ فقر کشتنِ فکر است، یعنی اگر شما به اندازه‌ی کافی برای حیاتِ خود پول نداشته باشید، برده‌ی بی‌اختیارِ پول خواهید شد همان شرایطی که طبقه‌ی متوسط به آن گذرانِ زندگی می‌گویند. جورج اورول
👍2
Ⓜ️ توهم بوقلمون:چرا نمی‌توانیم رویدادهای گذشته را به آینده تعمیم دهیم؟ 📝 محمدرضا سلیمی توهم بوقلمون نوعی خطای شناختی‌ست که نشان می‌دهد استدلال استقرایی همیشه قابل اعتماد نیست.این سوگیری توضیح می‌دهد که اگر صرفاً براساس تجربه‌های گذشته درباره‌ی آینده قضاوت کنیم، ممکن است با فاطعیت به نتیجه‌ای برسیم که کاملاً نادرست است. تصور کنید بوقلمونی در یک مزرعه زندگی می‌کند. هر روز صبح، کشاورز به او غذا می‌دهد و از او مراقب…
🔥1
💢مجموعه‌ی Incerto نوشته‌ی نسیم نیکولاس طالب (Nassim Nicholas Taleb) یک سری پنج‌جلدی از کتاب‌هایی است که به بررسی عدم‌قطعیت، شانس، ریسک، و شناخت انسانی از جهان می‌پردازد. این مجموعه ترکیبی از فلسفه، آمار، روانشناسی و تجربیات شخصی نویسنده است. Incerto به معنای "نامطمئن" یا "ناقطعیت" است. فهرست کتاب‌های مجموعه Incerto (به ترتیب انتشار): 1. Fooled by Randomness (فریب‌خورده با تصادف) 📘 خلاصه: این کتاب درباره‌ی این است ک…
🔥1
بزرگ ترین چالش در دی تریدینگ انتخاب بین ساخت یک استراتژی قانون مند و دقیق یا ترید با شهود و مشاهده آنی و استفاده از احساسات نیست بزرگ ترین چالش اینه که اون شهود پرورش یافته طی سالیان که تکامل پیدا کرده برای بی نقص بودن رو تبدیل به یک سیستم قانون مند با اجرای خشک و بدون شهود کنی.
👏2👍1
من روزهای خونی و پُر التهاب را من سطل‌های سوخته‌ی انقلاب را بر سنگفرشِ کهنه، بساط کتاب را بوسیدم و برای شما جا گذاشتم... من خش‌ّ و خشِ رفتگر از صبح زود را سیگار بهمن و ریه‌ی غرقِ دود را من هر که عاشقم شده بود و نبود را بوسیدم و برای شما جا گذاشتم..... فاطمه اختصاری @dokhtare_zemestoon
😢1
نوع دومش که من این مدلیم اینه که تو خوبی و تلاش میکنی خوب باشی چون کم هزینه ترین و کم دردسرترین روش زندگیه
👏1
یک نوعش اینه که تو خوبی و سعی میکنی خوب باشی چون تصور میکنی فضیلت اخلاقیه
می‌دونی دو نوع خوب بودن وجود داره
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TheOrdinaryTraders. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Ordinary Traders” (@TheOrdinaryTraders), 256 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheOrdinaryTraders.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.