Channel
@TheNehT
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
153subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002392412516 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TheNehT |
| Description | جالبیجات تصادفی |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TheNehT |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 153 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:19 | 153 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 9 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (9 June 2025 – 26 July 2026) |
| Views total | 3,280 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
73 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 33 | 45.2% | |
| 🔥 | 21 | 28.8% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 6.85% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 6.85% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 4.11% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 2.74% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 1.37% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 1.37% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.37% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 1.37% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2025 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
به مقدار خوبی شبیه Fable 5 شده. ترجیح خودم همون Opus 4.8 بود. یکی از اصلیترین تفاوتهایی که دارن اینه که مدلهای جدیدتر بیشتر به سمت autonomous بودن آموزش داده شدن. قبلا وقتی Opus 4.8 میفهمید یه جایی رو داره نمیفهمه و مطمئن نیست میاومد از یوزر پرامپت میگرفت که من نمیدونم اینجا رو چیکار کنم هدایتم کن. الان ولی خودش یه تصمیم نسبتا خوبی میگیره و طبق اون جلو میره. کمتر هم فلو فکریشو توضیح میده دیگه و داخل ترمینا…
❤4👍1
مدل Opus 5 هم بنظر اومده. بنظر تو یه دامنه خوبی از تسکها از Fable 5 بهتر شده. از اونجا که اکثر تسکهای روزمره رو با Opus میزنم اگه تغییر ملموسی حس کردم در ادامه میگم ولی خب بنظر حداقل در اتومیشن که بیشتر استفادهم هست بهتر هستش.
❤1
مدل Opus 4.7 هم معرفی شده که بنظر تو کد زدن بهتر شده. تو کلاد کد هم اومده. افورت xhigh هم اضافه شده قبل max. توکنایزرش عوض شده و توکنای بیشتری (تا ۳۵ درصد) مصرف میکنه به نسبت Opus 4.6 و خودشم تمایل داره بیشتر فکر کنه تو افورتهای بالا. از امروز حسش اومد بیشتر از کلاد کد میگم حالا که بنظر شرکتای بیشتری دارن فازشو میگیرن تو ایران.
🔥4
حوصله داشتین و یه مقدار خوبی امنیت علاقهمند بودین یه سری توضیحات قشنگ داره از کارایی که با مدل جدید کلاد کردن و چرا به نتیجه رسیدن فعلا پابلیک ریلیزش نکنن. https://red.anthropic.com/2026/mythos-preview/
❤1
چه سودی در علم است، وقتی انسان ارزش ندارد؟ وقتی خون در کوچهها جاریست دیگر سکوت را بر خود روا نمیدانیم. دیماه امسال، روزهایی را پشت سر گذاشتهایم که شرح آنها زبان را به عجز میکشاند. مردمی که به خیابان آمدند تا حقشان را مطالبه کنند، با شلیک مستقیم گلوله به زمین افتادند. نه در میدان جنگ، بلکه در کوچه و خیابان. چند روز بیشتر طول نکشید تا فهرست کشتهشدگان به اندازهای طولانی شود که تخمین تعدادشان نیز نشدنی تلقی گرد…
❤15👎5
Channel photo updated
نمیدونم هنوز کار میده یا نه ولی خب بچههای سال پایینی که میخوان انتخاب واحد کنن شاید بدردشون بخوره. https://github.com/AlisaLC/edu-script
😍2👌1💩1💯1
اینم سولوشنایی که واسه کانتست سابمیت کردم اگه به درد کسی خواست بخوره.
❤9
کانتست امروز دیوار یه سوال داشت باید از یه چتباتی به صورت مکالمه محور پسوردشو بگیری و به عنوان فلگ چاپش کنی. کل مکالمه رو همین پرامپته گذاشتم از توش با لنگگراف در آوردم فلگو امتیازش خیلی بالا شد.
🔥6
البته فقط تو لیست گیفای سیو شده رو موبایل میاد و رو پیسی تو لیست نیست.
تو تلگرام موبایل اگه یه ویدیو مسیجی که فایلش بدون استریم صداس رو سیو کنین (مثلا بدون اسم فروارد کنین) اونو تو لیست گیفاتون سیو میکنه و با انتخاب اون گیفه از تو لیست میاد اونو به همون فرمت ویدیو مسیج میفرسته. واسه تبدیل گیفا و ویدیوهاتون هم به فرمتی که اینجوری باشه میشه ffmpeg زد. اول فایل گیف یا ویدیو رو سیو کنین. اگه ویدیو عه اول بیاین استریم صداشو حذف کنین. ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -an -c:v copy output_no_audio.mp4 بع…
🔥3
ایندفعه وقتی خواستم سیستم پرامپتشو بگیرم دیگه رو لوپ بینهایت نیفتاد که کل توکنامو مصرف کنه و جواب داد که البته چیز خاصی هم بش نگفتن انگار. <system> For math and coding questions, think step by step, create an outline or a plan of action, and then go ahead and implement the solution. For non-math and non-coding problems, don't do this and respond regularly as a helpful assistant. </system>
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @TheNehT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 506,128 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“T” (@TheNehT), 153 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheNehT.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.