Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for погибшее кладбище

Channel

погибшее кладбище

@TheLostCemetery

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

367subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001946747426
TypeChannel
Username@TheLostCemetery
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TheLostCemetery

Growth

358367362.56 August 2026 — 358 subscribers6 August 2026 — 358 subscribers7 August 2026 — 360 subscribers13 August 2026 — 367 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 357–368 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:54367+7
7 Aug 2026, 01:22360+2
6 Aug 2026, 21:03358no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:31358first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
57.1%
avg views ÷ 367 subscribers
Avg views / post
210
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held17 (15 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total2,724
Reactions total423
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 21:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

523 reactions across 16 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 535505907398322105211021.0%
💘9918.9%
❤‍🔥6913.2%
custom 53435726263317095586512.4%
428.03%
custom 5368783783711511907387.27%
custom 5366513214890745153295.54%
🍓275.16%
custom 5346027045522544509112.10%
custom 546294573617592690271.34%
🐳50.956%
👾50.956%
🕊30.574%
😭30.574%
🙏30.574%
💋20.382%
💯20.382%
🤩20.382%
custom 523799539382383263110.191%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 523reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
51
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 16 we hold a reading for · 44%
Most on one post
20
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TheLostCemetery. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC83 views32 reactions20 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

говном мажу, потому что я потерял первоначальную задумку, а еще мне хотелось удалить этот непонятный скетч, но блин, короче я хз максимально

❤‍🔥128custom 53687837837115119076🍓3custom 53665132148907451532custom 53435726263317095581

2 Aug 2026, 20:43 UTC128 views31 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ЕБЯТ, подписывайтесь на хелль, у нее крутые фанфики по ШУТКАМ‼️‼️ https://t.me/nothelliant вот ее канал https://t.me/nothelliant/14 а вот список фанфиков🌟🌟 видимо пост про дейли/когфу по шуткам оказалось не шуткой

custom 5355059073983221052137❤‍🔥4🙏3custom 53665132148907451532custom 53687837837115119072

1 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC172 views40 reactionsread 6 August 2026

этот канал потихоньку прекращается в конфу/дейли по шуткам🌟

❤‍🔥15custom 535505907398322105212💘10custom 53435726263317095583

1 Aug 2026, 10:32 UTC149 views32 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @kamaHUBart

Posted without readable text

❤‍🔥13custom 53550590739832210528🍓5💘3😭3

30 Jul 2026, 18:31 UTC179 views43 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

я, кстати, пытался в стиле чет поменять, пожтому ужасно тренировался по артам других лбдей, эн уговорил все таки и в основу скинуть, пожтому вотт я нашел автора, чей стиль я пытался повторить, пожтому, чтобы не ощущать на себе вину!! mizeffect в тамблере, вот первый арт, моя душа чиста второй я скетчил просто в заметках, когда у меня сдох ибис

custom 534357262633170955819custom 53460270455225445099custom 546294573617592690272❤‍🔥2🍓2custom 53550590739832210522

30 Jul 2026, 14:52 UTC180 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ЕБЯТ, посмотрите, что за красота 🥹🥹🤩🤩

12❤‍🔥2🤩1

26 Jul 2026, 15:32 UTC256 views63 reactions20 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

сегодня контента вам, мне лень доводить до ума этот арт, я цветовую палитру меня раза 3🌟 файликом в комментах МИК, ПРИВЕТ, ОТКУДА У ТЕБЯ ДЕНЬГИ

💘30❤‍🔥14custom 5355059073983221052112🍓2💋2custom 53435726263317095582

25 Jul 2026, 22:21 UTC265 views36 reactions6 Starsread 6 August 2026

я умею писать больше двух слов, ам,, какая-то зарисовка по оддисей дуо тв кв насилие 🤑 https://telegra.ph/odissej-duo-07-23 ЭЙВ, ПРИВЕТ, СПАСИБО 😭😭😭 ебят, а вы знали, что эйв очень крутая, я вообще ощущаю себя так, будто меня учитель хвалитЧТОЗАДЕЛА

custom 536878378371151190716custom 53665132148907451537💘3🕊3❤‍🔥2🍓2👾1custom 52379953938238326311

24 Jul 2026, 15:20 UTC253 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026

снова парная с немом автор hinamie в тамблере

custom 535505907398322105212💘4custom 53435726263317095583

21 Jul 2026, 22:27 UTC289 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026

вот нечем людям заняться, ну что за дела то пошли

💘94❤‍🔥3💯2

21 Jul 2026, 22:26 UTC271 views8 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @merfzoid_tg

❗️ВАЖНО! ПРОШУ РАСППОСТРОНЕНИЯ ЭТОЙ ИНФОРМАЦИИ, ОСОБЕННО ХУДОЖНИКАМ❗️ ну ребят блять, вы если закрываете свой тгк в целях безопасности, создавайте запасной канал и ставьте свой юзернейм туда, дабы его никто не украл. какой-то обиженный на художников приниматель членов в жопу спиздил у вас всё, накручивает ботов на ваши каналы и всячески пытается снести их. ранее этот же человек спиздил юз моего прошлого канала, и опу

5💘2🤩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @TheLostCemetery. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 372,715 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“погибшее кладбище” (@TheLostCemetery), 367 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheLostCemetery.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.