Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The Ivorsson Dilemma

Channel

The Ivorsson Dilemma

@TheIvorssonDilemma

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

867subscribers

+28 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002624628423
TypeChannel
Username@TheIvorssonDilemma
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/TheIvorssonDilemma

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8398678536 August 2026 — 839 subscribers6 August 2026 — 839 subscribers13 August 2026 — 847 subscribers20 August 2026 — 859 subscribers26 August 2026 — 863 subscribers1 September 2026 — 861 subscribers9 September 2026 — 863 subscribers18 September 2026 — 867 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 43 days, net +28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 835–871 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 07:01867+4
9 Sept 2026, 18:38863+2
1 Sept 2026, 03:55861-2
26 Aug 2026, 03:54863+4
20 Aug 2026, 02:47859+12
13 Aug 2026, 01:45847+8
6 Aug 2026, 15:05839no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:49839first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

361 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍10228.3%
💯8423.3%
🔥5715.8%
😁4011.1%
308.31%
🤡164.43%
🥴164.43%
🤔123.32%
😢30.831%
🤣10.277%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 361 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 21:12 UTC256 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Apparently, he has resigned, despite his myriad online Leftist advocates claiming there was a "racist campaign" to dethrone him.

😁13

5 Aug 2026, 21:04 UTC236 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Jason Arday reminds me of a guy I wrote about, Rufus Fennell, whom the Left championed as the hero of the UK Race Riots of 1919. I have a Substack on the riots and Rufus, if you’re interested.

🤡12👍4

4 Aug 2026, 20:08 UTC303 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

It's interesting, however, that Haynemann thinks this, despite his assertions that there's no difference between the races. Again, you see A LOT of this same observation here in the testimonies, namely that the Chinese are very smart, but imitative which coincides with many HBD observations today.

👍8🤔2

4 Aug 2026, 19:41 UTC332 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Devon's post about bees overlaps with what I wrote about in my article Culture is Downstream of Genetics.

🔥16

4 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC310 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Herman Heynemann, a local merchant and president of the Pioneer Woolen Factory, speaks in a way that approximates what Franz Boas would argue some 36 years later. In 1912, Boas published Changes in Bodily Forms of Descendants of Immigrants where he asserted that immigrants' physical characteristics were not immutable, that even skull shapes and sizes were conforming to an "American phenotype." Boas didn't quite arg

🤔7🥴6

4 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC331 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ko-fi has promptly republished my page. Very grateful for the quick action. EDIT: Three people's donations "failed" or were declined. Not sure as to the reason. They're listed as "generic" or "failed." https://ko-fi.com/wilhemivorsson/goal?g=22

👍16

4 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC321 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💯18😁6

3 Aug 2026, 19:53 UTC342 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026

It appears that KoFi flagged my account, because it received donations before the page was fully completed. They unpublished the page and gave me instructions on how to appeal, which I proceeded to do. Hopefully, they are as prompt in replying as they are in unpublishing. EDIT: Ko-fi has promptly republished my page. Very grateful for the quick action.

👍14😢3🤔2

3 Aug 2026, 04:57 UTC354 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Jeremy's expressed mentality in the emergent age of AI can be found in the hearings on Chinese immigration that I'm going through from 1876. Charles Crocker (Central Pacific Railroad) and other capitalists felt that Chinese immigration would elevate White labor, and that if you weren't smart enough or lacked the skills to take advantage of said labor, then that was on you. It's the same concept here with AI. Jeremy

🔥19👍3

2 Aug 2026, 23:27 UTC426 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

This is a segment from my series on BioShock. Someone just posted it again on X.

👍13🔥10

2 Aug 2026, 19:37 UTC≈2,450 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026

I set up a Ko-Fi account if you want to give support that way. I'm also trying to raise money to attend this year's AmRen conference. To date, I have never been able to attend any kind of movement events. This is mostly because I live abroad and can't afford to travel. But Jared Taylor and others are getting older, and I don't think my financial situation will get much better in the future. So I'm asking for suppor

👍24🔥2🤡1🤣1

1 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC435 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

The Chinese woman asks Nolan: "Are you a bard for a civilization at dusk?" https://x.com/geoffkeighley/status/2083401904957325496

🥴10🔥5🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @TheIvorssonDilemma. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The Ivorsson Dilemma” (@TheIvorssonDilemma), 867 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheIvorssonDilemma.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.