Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐀 𝐅𝐀𝐑𝐀𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐈

Channel

𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐀 𝐅𝐀𝐑𝐀𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐈

@TheHumanEthos

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

405subscribers

-6,875 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002044696147
TypeChannel
Username@TheHumanEthos
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded19 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TheHumanEthos

Growth

4057,2803,842.519 August 2026 — 7,280 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,280 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,237 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,520 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,089 subscribers30 August 2026 — 405 subscribers19 August 202630 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 11 days, net -6,875. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 17:24405-5,684
27 Aug 2026, 13:056,089-431
24 Aug 2026, 07:376,520-717
20 Aug 2026, 10:327,237-43
19 Aug 2026, 22:157,280no change
19 Aug 2026, 22:007,280first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
52.6%
avg views ÷ 405 subscribers
Avg views / post
213
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 20 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held22 (4 August 202620 August 2026)
Views total4,475
Reactions total62
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 00s
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

62 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5182.3%
👏58.06%
👍46.45%
❤‍🔥11.61%
💔11.61%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 04:57 UTC14 viewsread 20 August 2026

تو دریای من بودی، آغوش وا کن که می‌خواهد این قویِ زیبا بمیرد جهان خسته از خویش و آدم زِ هستی چه سود از جهانی که باید بمیرد؟ چه سود از طلوعی که پایانش این است که هر شام، خورشیدِ فردا بمیرد؟ من از زندگی جز سرابی ندیدم که هر تشنه در حسرتِ او بمیرد زمین گورِ رویاست، دنیا سراب است خوشا آن‌کس که پیش از فنا بمیرد نه فردا وفایی، نه دیروز باقی‌ست خوشا آن دلی کز غمِ فردا بمیرد من این زندگی را چه کردم که آخر نصیبم همین با

Signed 𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐀 𝐅𝐀𝐑𝐀𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐈

20 Aug 2026, 04:57 UTC11 views1 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Voice message

جهان هرچه باشد، سرانجام هیچ است خوشا آن‌که در «عشق»، زیبا بمیرد

1

Signed 𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐀 𝐅𝐀𝐑𝐀𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐈

20 Aug 2026, 04:57 UTC11 views1 reactionsread 20 August 2026

شنیدم که چون قویِ زیبا بمیرد فریبنده‌زاد و فریبا بمیرد شبِ مرگ تنها نشیند به موجی رَوَد گوشه‌ای، دور و تنها بمیرد در آن گوشه چندان غزل خوانَد آن‌شب که خود در میانِ غزل‌ها بمیرد گروهی برآنند که‌این مرغ شیدا کجا عاشقی کرد، آن‌جا بمیرد شبِ مرگ، از بیم، آن‌جا شتابد که از مرگ غافل شود تا بمیرد من این نکته گیرم که باور نکردم ندیدم که قویی به صحرا بمیرد چو روزی ز آغوشِ دریا بر آمد شبی هم در آغوشِ دریا بمیرد تو دریای

1

Signed 𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐀 𝐅𝐀𝐑𝐀𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐈

16 Aug 2026, 21:26 UTC68 views4 reactionsread 20 August 2026

بعضی وقتا لبخندی که کل دنیا نتونن شاید یه لحظه به لب کسی بیارن، ولی اون کار برای تو مثل آب خوردنه و تو آگاهانه دریغ میکنی ازش.. انسانیت رو برای خودت معنا کن و بعد حرف از اخلاق بزن شب بخیر ✨

3👍1

Signed 𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐀 𝐅𝐀𝐑𝐀𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐈

16 Aug 2026, 21:23 UTC69 views5 reactionsread 20 August 2026

هر وقت از آموزش لاشی گری و گسلایت و روانشناسی دارک و حروم زاده بازی و بازیای مختلف و ریاکاری خسته شدین و به تهش رسیدید، کمی هم برید سراغ ادم بودن و لطمه نزدن به قلب آدما و امن بودن و دلیل خوشی هم دیگه شدن و هدیه دادن آرامش به هم دیگه و مهربونی کردن و خلاصش کنم: «انسانیت» باور کنید شرافتمندانه زندگی کردن هم خوبه:) ✍ #تینا_فراهانی

2👍2💔1

Signed 𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐀 𝐅𝐀𝐑𝐀𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐈

16 Aug 2026, 21:18 UTC64 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

2

Signed 𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐀 𝐅𝐀𝐑𝐀𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐈

15 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC74 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

کاش دیر نفهمیم... 💔

1❤‍🔥1

Signed 𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐀 𝐅𝐀𝐑𝐀𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐈

14 Aug 2026, 20:39 UTC100 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026

زندگی بعضی وقتا تلخیش اینقدر زیاد میشه که فقط با «اشتباه» میشه ازش گذر کرد ❌ صحبت از (انتخاب) نیست ✅ صحبتم میزان تحمل و تاب اوریه.

1👍1👏1

Signed 𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐀 𝐅𝐀𝐑𝐀𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐈

14 Aug 2026, 20:35 UTC78 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

دوتا چیز هست که نباید هیچ وقت دنبالش باشیم دوستان واقعی و عشق واقعی آدم ها برای چیزی یا کسی که میخوان، بی منت و طلب وقت میزارن پیام میدن و پیامشون رو جواب میدن سعی نکن آدمارو متقاعد کنی بزار همون طور که راحتن چه درست چه اشتباه بمونن

👏21

Signed 𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐀 𝐅𝐀𝐑𝐀𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐈

13 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC≈2,290 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @PsychoanalyticalSocietyPhoto

🎓 جامعه ی بین المللی #روانکاوی ( I.P.S ) 𝚿 مرجع رسمی آموزش فارسی #روان_تحلیلی : ⟢ @PsychoanalyticalSociety

👏2

Signed 𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐀 𝐅𝐀𝐑𝐀𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐈

7 Aug 2026, 08:39 UTC198 views5 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

یادمه یه روز یکی بود..

5

Signed 𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐀 𝐅𝐀𝐑𝐀𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐈

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @TheHumanEthos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 305,531 of 1,629,571 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐀 𝐅𝐀𝐑𝐀𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐈” (@TheHumanEthos), 405 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheHumanEthos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.