Ну так что скажешь, путник(ца)?
- Вежливо отказаться0%
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Channel
@TheGreatestBard
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
17subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003936053021 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TheGreatestBard |
| Description | — 𝗠𝗮𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗶𝗻𝗱 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂. 𝖢𝗋: _𝗐𝗇𝖽𝗁𝗂, 𝗃𝗈𝗌𝗁𝗎𝟩 𝗈𝗇 𝖷 |
| Created | 9 April 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TheGreatestBard |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 17 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:54 | 17 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
142 reactions across 15 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🕊 | 58 | 40.8% | |
| custom 5341462405819943172 | 43 | 30.3% | |
| custom 5408906534967080998 | 41 | 28.9% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 142reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2026 to 17 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TheGreatestBard. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 April 2026 to 17 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ну так что скажешь, путник(ца)?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
𝖣𝖺𝗍𝖾: 𝟏𝟕.𝟎𝟓 ❌ 𝖯𝖺𝗀𝖾 𝐗, 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗒 𝟔 𝖨 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗐𝖺𝗒𝗐𝖺𝗋𝖽 𝗐𝗂𝗇𝖽 — 𝗍𝗈𝗀𝖾𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗋 𝗐𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗐𝗈𝗋𝗅𝖽. ❌❌Привет-привет, путник(ца)! Наверняка ты уже успел(а) по мне соскучиться, верно? Эхе, признаю, меня долговато не было! ♥️ ❌❌Ты, верно, сейчас думаешь: “И где же ты пропадал всё это время?”. Всё просто — вольный ветер никогда не задерживается надолго в одном месте, он странствует по всему Тейвату, и в этом мы с ним до …
🕊5custom 53414624058199431723custom 54089065349670809983
➡️ℝ𝗘𝗠𝗜𝗡𝔻𝗘𝗥 │𝗘𝗡𝗗 𝗢𝗙 𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗧⠀⠀ Венти уже освободился от всех дел и снова готов уделять тебе время!
custom 53414624058199431721
➡️𝗡𝕆𝗧𝗜𝗙𝗜𝗖𝗔𝗧𝗜𝕆𝗡 │#REST 🤍🤍 Аппарат абонента @TheGreatestBard выключен или находится вне зоны действия сети до 9 мая.
🕊1
Какое твоё любимое блюдо? 🌟
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🕊4custom 53414624058199431723custom 54089065349670809983
Как ты справляешься с тоской?
The shares total 166%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🕊4custom 53414624058199431723custom 54089065349670809983
𝖣𝖺𝗍𝖾: 𝟐𝟓.𝟎𝟒 ❌ 𝖯𝖺𝗀𝖾 𝐗, 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗒 𝟓 𝖳𝗋𝗎𝗌𝗍 𝗆𝖾 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝗒𝗈𝗎𝗋 𝗌𝗈𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗐, 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖨, 𝖺𝗌 𝖺 𝗍𝗋𝗎𝖾 𝖿𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗇𝖽, 𝗐𝗂𝗅𝗅 𝗍𝗎𝗋𝗇 𝗂𝗍 𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗎𝗌𝗍. ❌❌Первые лучи солнца едва коснулись горизонта, а я уже на ногах! В этот час привычная суета ещё не спешит заполнять улочки Мондштадта — люди безмятежно дремлют в своих постелях. ♥️ А потому мне не остаётся ничего другого, кроме как предаваться музыке и тихим думам. ❌❌И вот, совсем недавно, размышлени…
🕊5custom 54089065349670809984custom 53414624058199431723
❌❌Эй, и что это за мысли — “не хочу обременять других своей тяжестью”? Разве не для того нужны друзья, чтобы подставить плечо, когда ты сам уже едва справляешься?
🕊3custom 53414624058199431722custom 54089065349670809982
𝖣𝖺𝗍𝖾: 𝟐𝟑.𝟎𝟒 ❌ 𝖯𝖺𝗀𝖾 𝐗, 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗒 𝟒 𝖶𝗁𝗒 𝗁𝖺𝗏𝖾 𝖿𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗌, 𝗂𝖿 𝗇𝗈𝗍 𝗍𝗈 𝖻𝖾 𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗂𝖽 𝗋𝗈𝖼𝗄 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗋? ❌❌Несколько дней назад, когда мы вместе наслаждались отдыхом, я уловил в твоём взгляде тень… Знаешь, такую тихую, безнадёжную тоску. Эх, прости мне мою проницательность, путник(ца)! ♥️ Я видел, как старательно ты прячешь это чувство за лучезарной улыбкой и звонким смехом, но от барда не скроешь фальшивую ноту в ме…
🕊5custom 53414624058199431723custom 54089065349670809983
❌❌Ну, что скажешь? Составишь завтра компанию лучшему барду во всём Тейвате?
🕊5custom 53414624058199431722custom 54089065349670809982
𝖣𝖺𝗍𝖾: 𝟏𝟖.𝟎𝟒 ❌ 𝖯𝖺𝗀𝖾 𝐗, 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗒 𝟑 𝖨𝗇 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍 𝖺𝖿𝖿𝖺𝗂𝗋𝗌, 𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝗌𝗁𝗈𝗎𝗅𝖽 𝗇𝗈𝗍 𝗇𝖾𝗀𝗅𝖾𝖼𝗍 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗈𝗇𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗅𝖿. ❌❌Разве найдётся в целом свете город, что милее Мондштадта? Только прислушайся: тонкий аромат одуванчикового вина, звонкие трели птиц и мерный, убаюкивающий скрип ветряных мельниц… ♥️ Так и тянет прилечь в тени раскидистой яблони, позабыв о всякой суете. А после — лениво постучать по стволу, ловя со…
🕊6custom 53414624058199431723custom 54089065349670809983
𝖣𝖺𝗍𝖾: 𝟏𝟒.𝟎𝟒 ❌ 𝖯𝖺𝗀𝖾 𝐗, 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗒 𝟐 𝖫𝖾𝗍 𝖾𝖺𝖼𝗁 𝗈𝖿 𝗒𝗈𝗎𝗋 𝖺𝖽𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗐𝖾𝖺𝗏𝖾 𝗂𝗍𝗌𝖾𝗅𝖿 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖺 𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗒 𝖻𝖾𝗒𝗈𝗇𝖽 𝖻𝖾𝗅𝗂𝖾𝖿. ❌❌Ну что скажешь? Славно мы вчера посидели, верно! Знаешь, я давно не ощущал, чтобы беседа летела так же легко и свободно, словно её подхватил весенний ветерок. С тобой даже не нужно подбирать слова — будь то высокое искусство, капризы погоды или дальние страны, любая тема кажется самой подходящей! ♥️ ❌❌А…
🕊7custom 53414624058199431724custom 54089065349670809984
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TheGreatestBard. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Ну так что скажешь, путник(ца)?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какое твоё любимое блюдо? 🌟
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Как ты справляешься с тоской?
The shares total 166%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2026 to 17 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,154,544 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝖴𝗇𝗋𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗅𝖾𝖽 𝗕𝗮𝗿𝗱 🍃” (@TheGreatestBard), 17 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheGreatestBard.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.