Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Забросило ли первое звено?

Channel

Забросило ли первое звено?

@TheFirstLink1946

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

144subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002319827385
TypeChannel
Username@TheFirstLink1946
DescriptionПаблик, посвящённый Московскому Спартаку и первому звену нашей красно-белой машины ❤️🤍 По всем вопросам: @kolya_ilyukhin Отдать голос и поддержать: https://t.me/boost/TheFirstLink1946
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/TheFirstLink1946

Growth

1447 Aug 2026, 13:48 — 144 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 21:16 — 144 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 13:488 Aug 2026, 21:16
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 143–145 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 21:16144no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:48144first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 6 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,070
Videos
255
Links
301

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 20s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

630 reactions across 19 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
16726.5%
custom 531468147225318844015124.0%
🔥9815.6%
custom 5402080698062369688497.78%
🎉335.24%
😢264.13%
custom 5211148339235546071182.86%
custom 5390902371364659563172.70%
custom 5352576239288735704162.54%
custom 5211081067162787799121.90%
👏111.75%
💔101.59%
custom 521079007024357760271.11%
custom 540253843849690572760.952%
😁50.794%
🤔30.476%
custom 521096908018550905910.159%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 630reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2025 to 31 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
155
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 19 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
154
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TheFirstLink1946. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 May 2025 to 31 August 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2025, 11:02 UTC527 views39 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Получается, что больше не будем Спасибо Николаю Голдобину за вдохновение и удачи (но не в играх против «Спартака»).

😢26💔93🤔1

25 Jun 2025, 09:55 UTC680 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ИТОГОВАЯ СТАТИСТИКА ПЕРВОГО ЗВЕНА ♦️ Благодарим парней за прошедший сезон и ждём, что в следующем сезоне первое звено засияет ещё ярче! ♦️ Напоминаем, что вдохновитель на создание канала - Николай Голдобин. К слову, он и является лучшим бомбардиром прошедшего сезона в составе московского «Спартака» А также отмечаем ♦️ Павла Порядина и ♦️ Ивана Морозова, ведь бразильцы дополняли друг друга и приносили пользу команд

18👏6🎉4

29 May 2025, 14:21 UTC524 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Продолжаем! ♦️ «Приглашение на огонёк» от Анселя Галимова в первом матче серии против «Северстали» заняло 2️⃣-е место в ТОПе лучших силовых приёмов плей-офф 2025 года!

17custom 52107900702435776027🔥2🎉1custom 53146814722531884401

29 May 2025, 13:32 UTC442 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Время переключаться на КХЛ (там и разбор первого звена скоро будет 👀) ♦️ Шайба Павла Порядина во втором матче первого раунда против «Северстали» заняла 1️⃣5️⃣-е место в ТОПе лучших голов прошедшего плей-офф!

custom 521108106716278779912🔥4custom 531468147225318844041custom 52109690801855090591

28 May 2025, 15:55 UTC301 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Одно важное напоминание: МЫ ЧЕМПИОНЫ! ❤️🤍

21

25 May 2025, 09:59 UTC349 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

«”Сокольники” и “Спартак” - это очень большая сила», - Роман Золкин И как с ним не согласиться, верно?

custom 5314681472253188440234

24 May 2025, 20:39 UTC287 views75 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Помните, что произошло 7 часов и 21 минуту назад? Правильно! Мы стали чемпионами Доброй ночи, красно-белые! ❤️🤍

🔥31custom 531468147225318844020custom 5390902371364659563177

24 May 2025, 15:24 UTC282 views56 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ну, и по традиции… ♦️ 🤝 ♦️

custom 531468147225318844034custom 5352576239288735704165🎉1

24 May 2025, 13:57 UTC278 views41 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

♦️🔥🏆

🔥20custom 531468147225318844011🎉82

24 May 2025, 13:18 UTC287 views43 reactions154 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

МЫ ЧЕМПИОНЫ!

🔥2912👏2

24 May 2025, 13:08 UTC322 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

4:21 до феерии, слёз радости и красивого завершения сезона МХЛ

custom 5314681472253188440112🤔2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @TheFirstLink1946. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Забросило ли первое звено?” (@TheFirstLink1946), 144 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheFirstLink1946.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.