2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 695–697 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Aug 2026, 22:53
696
no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:16
696
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 29 June 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
434 reactions across 17 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
159
36.6%
👍
139
32.0%
😢
48
11.1%
🔥
35
8.06%
🤯
10
2.30%
😁
8
1.84%
👎
6
1.38%
👏
6
1.38%
🙏
5
1.15%
❤🔥
3
0.691%
👌
3
0.691%
🤔
3
0.691%
🥰
3
0.691%
🎉
2
0.461%
🐳
2
0.461%
🕊
2
0.461%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 434reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2022 to 31 July 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
CloneBot V2 Update: 🌟
Repository Link:
https://github.com/TheCaduceus/CloneBot_V2
1.Okteto Ban Bypass:
A kid named Okteto recently banned CloneBot V2 from platform! So bypass implemented.
2.Scalingo Ban Bypass:
A kid named Scalingo recently banned CloneBot V2 from platform! So bypass implemented.
3.Heroku Ban Improvements:
A kid named Heroku tried to ban CloneBot V2 from platform! Bypass hidden and improved.
4.Code…
Dr.Torrent Update:
Hello Users!
As recently Dr.Torrent Group got deleted due to a false complains made by ByteScare. As a response, I contacted Telegram and ByteScare to take back there copyright claims and let me take required actions, but I thought that it will take too much time to get things normal. So ignoring this accident! I created new Dr.Torrent Group which can be joined by below given link. I know many of y…
Dr.Torrent Group:
Due to some copyright reports against @DrTorrent Group! The Group got temporary closed by Telegram and of course it is false response by Telegram. I am contacting Telegram Support and will update you once I get any update.
Don't leave group! It will be right back!
🗞UPDATE:
Recently, Our @DrTorrent Group received DMCA Complaint by Bytescare and I got notified by Telegram. As a response, I contacted Telegram and Bytescare to resolve the matter and give me further details so that I can take necessary actions.
Hopefully! Telegram Moderators cooperated with me and they deleted messages which are violating Bytescare's Copyright policy. While they also shared the information of User…
⚙️Feature Request:
As you all know about my Multi Cloud Transfer (MCT) Tool which helping people to interact and use complex command line based tools by providing a simple user-interface and same customization options as the tool supports which I released just a month ago got too popular among large number of people.
Starting from version v3.0.5 to v4.1.2, MCT Tool started beating up almost all Jupyter Notebooks tha…
⛔️Torrent Group Notice:
I am planning to stop new members to join @DrTorrent once Group reach 1000 members to accommodate and deliver them best performance as possible.
New Rules imposed! Check joining status given below before making request to join.
This decision is their to prevent group from spammers (generally kids), So if you want to join group then please take your decision fast! Recently Telegram sending no…
Google Drive Speed Drop:
As many people suffering from download speed drop in Google Drive! I created a thread on Google Drive Help forum. So if you are also suffering or tackling this same problem then consider upvoting the thread, so that Google Drive Team get notified of this issue earliest.
To prove this problem, I also attached the result of poll that I created yesterday. So I hope they will take less time to a…
MCT Tool⚙️:
It seems that NVIDIA's Developer website having issues for specific setup files, due to which MCT Tool is unable to collect required files and unable to install Rclone and other dependencies and due to which all users getting "Command not found" errors because of missing files.
For their knowledge, I just created issue on their repository. I don't care! I am preparing a patch to fix this problem and ena…
CloneBot V2⚡️:
1.Upgraded Gclone to v1.59.0
2.Changed base Image to Ubuntu 22.04
3.New Docker Image is now available for use.
Gclone is updated as per Rclone v1.59.0 (Latest), to update deployed bots, just redeploy it.
🎉New Repository UPDATE🎉
Name: Multi Cloud Transfer Tool (MCT Tool)
Checkout:
https://www.caduceus.ml/Multi-Cloud-Transfer-Tool/
GitHub:
https://github.com/TheCaduceus/Multi-Cloud-Transfer-Tool
🆕What's New!🆕
1.Package Upgrades:
->Rclone upgraded to v1.59.0
->yt-dlp upgraded to v2022.06.29
->7-Zip upgraded to v22.06.15
2.New features:
->Combine multiple remotes in one directory tree
->MCT Configuration data can be…
❤11👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @TheCaduceusUPDATE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Are you experiencing any drop down in download speed of Google Drive? 🤔 If yes then comment "What you downloading and how?"
Yup! 😶76%
Nope! 😌24%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2022 to 31 July 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 374,643 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@TheCaduceusUPDATE named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@drtorrent named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@jsr9057634439 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Caduceus” (@TheCaduceusUPDATE), 696 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheCaduceusUPDATE.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.