File, posted without a caption
β€4π―3π1π₯1

Channel
@TheBelgorodBrit
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
694subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002531829519 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TheBelgorodBrit |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TheBelgorodBrit |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:52 | 694 | +7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 687 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (9 July 2026 β 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 26,814 |
| Reactions total | 276 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 21:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
335 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π― | 128 | 38.2% | |
| β€ | 80 | 23.9% | |
| π | 46 | 13.7% | |
| π₯ | 32 | 9.55% | |
| π | 26 | 7.76% | |
| π«‘ | 15 | 4.48% | |
| π | 5 | 1.49% | |
| π | 1 | 0.299% | |
| π | 1 | 0.299% | |
| π€ | 1 | 0.299% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 335reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
File, posted without a caption
β€4π―3π1π₯1
The Belgorod Brit returns to give us his take on the myth of control. Do our leaders control us and others, or is it the opposite way round? In the film, he talks about the mosaic of factions fighting in West Asia. The influence of the official leaders seems limited. Is the President of Lebanon powerful? What about Hamas? In order to understand what is going on, one needs to have a granular understanding of the pressβ¦
π―8β€4π2π₯2π€1
The Monastery of St Sava
β€18π5π2π1
To all you soldiers mad enough to throw yourselves out of perfectly serviceable aircraft - Happy Paratrooper Day!
π«‘15β€9
File, posted without a caption
π―7π4β€1π₯1
The Belgorod Brit talks about the way our beliefs shape our actions. In the film, he explains the motivation of the Chinese peasant rebellion that threatened to overthrow the Ching dynasty in the 1850s. It was inspired by a failed mandarin's religious conversion. Hong Xiuquan inspired millions of ordinary people to take up arms with a vision of the Heavenly Kingdom of Great Peace. Some 30 million Chinese perished as β¦
π―11π5β€1π₯1
File, posted without a caption
π―6β€2π1π1
The Belgorod Brit tackles sanctions. What are they? How do they work? Why don't they work? In the film, he talks about the first sanctions of the modern era. When the British abolished slavery in 1833 in their own Empire, they extended the Act to allow the Royal Navy to interdict slavers operating on the high seas and who had no connection with the British Empire. This was the first time secular moral decisions were β¦
π―7π4β€3π1
File, posted without a caption
π―8π₯4β€1π1
The Belgorod Brit compares Trump to Homer Simpson. In the film, BB explains his view that if you extract all the kindness and humanity from Homer Simpson, and replace it with narcissism and psychopathy, then you have Donald Trump, the absolute worst person to own a cat, let alone run a state armed with nuclear weapons. Even if Trump goes, those who would replace him are just as bad, only in a way peculiar to themselvβ¦
π―14π4π₯3π2β€1
File, posted without a caption
π6π₯5π4β€2
The Belgorod Brit talks about how the face of the leadership in the West is unimportant. Starmer is replaced by Burnham, and nothing will change for the UK. But what about the imperial centre? Will anything change when the boomer gerontocracy shuffles reluctantly off the stage, will the tech oligarchs change anything? BB doubts it will be for the better, if it does. In the podcast, BB examines the general effect of β¦
π13π―6β€4π₯2π1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TheBelgorodBrit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank β 141,654 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βThe Belgorod Brit Channel π·πΊπ¬π§β (@TheBelgorodBrit), 694 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheBelgorodBrit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.