🐾 $PAWS has arrived to exchanges Tomorrow 16.04 at 12:00 CET time is THAT DAY! It's time to check your wallets👀 Bybit is leading in speed this time, many have already reached this exchange $PAWS Distribution Ongoing🔥
❤1

Channel
@TheAirdropCurator
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
472subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002164050945 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TheAirdropCurator |
| Description | Here you can get: Quality Crypto Airdrops, Farming updates and making Money Online Our Chat 🗨️ : @AirdropCuratorChat |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TheAirdropCurator |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 472 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 472 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 19 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
26 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 10 | 38.5% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 34.6% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 11.5% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 7.69% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 3.85% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 3.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 January 2025 to 15 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🐾 $PAWS has arrived to exchanges Tomorrow 16.04 at 12:00 CET time is THAT DAY! It's time to check your wallets👀 Bybit is leading in speed this time, many have already reached this exchange $PAWS Distribution Ongoing🔥
❤1
Blum Rolls Out Minimum Distribution Criteria Drop criteria: 🟢 Min. 100 thousand BP (Blum Points) 🟢 Minimum 750 MP (Meme Points) OR PoA (Proof of Activity) completed 🟢 Min 2 referrals
PAWS claim opened Only two exchanges for withdrawal: Bybit and BitGet
👍4❤1
Paws bybit👀👀
❤1🔥1
$PAWS token minted on Solana 14 hours ago TS; 100 billion $PAWS 🐾 Listing announcements soon
❤1🔥1
$ZOO listing timer
😁1
$PAWS will be on all top exchanges! 🐾 One of the developers confirmed the release of PAWS on all tier 1 exchanges on his Twitter. Official emission - 100 billion What price do you expect?
$PAWS Price Prediction According to Bear Earn ⭐️Total Supply : 100 Billion ⭐️Circulating Supply : 50 billion ⭐️Vouchers : 2% Supply(2 billion) ⭐️1 voucher : 8888 Paws token ⭐️Airdrop : 62.5% ⭐️Listing : March First week ⭐️1 Wpaws : 16 Paws tokens (Apprx) ⭐️Vesting : No ⭐️Price : $0.002 - $0.006 ⭐️Eligibile Users : less than 4 million ⭐️Average allocation : 10000 Tokens Market Cap : ➡️ 100 Mil…
🔥1🗿1
Zoo Tokenomics 🚩 Friends, it's time to share details about our tokenomics! For miners (players) 60% of the total supply will be distributed among our community - players who participated in the mining stage. For future growth The remaining 40% will go towards further development, marketing, listings, liquidity, community incentives, market makers, team rewards and more. More detailed distribution information w…
PAWS will distribute 7.5% of total supply to Solana OG users. If you hold WIF, PENGU, GIGA OR JUP, you will be eligible to receive a share of this 7.5%.
After a long time, Tapswap announced the results of its airdrop😄 How many $TAPS you earn? ❤️ - We wait listing for 1 years 🔥 - They will listing soon
😢2❤1
Paws activity control task🐾 You solve a simple captcha to do the task It is mandatory to do the task⚠️
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @TheAirdropCurator. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Airdrop Curator 💎” (@TheAirdropCurator), 472 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheAirdropCurator.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.