Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ᅠ 星号💬 – 𝗧.𝖧𝖤 / 𝗪𝗘ISS!

@Th3Weiss

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

53subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002324858353
TypeChannel
Username@Th3Weiss
Descriptionㅤ𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗪𝗘ISS – виртуальная социальная сеть в индустрии студий, которая позволяет пользователям делиться своими эмоциями, публиковать истории, фотографии и видео от своего имени > @imtruewony : @mwksu
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 December 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Th3Weiss

Growth

5311 Aug 2026, 00:16 — 53 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 00:30 — 53 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 00:1611 Aug 2026, 00:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 52–54 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 00:3053no change
11 Aug 2026, 00:1653first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 31 December 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
511
Links
7

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

64 reactions across 8 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🎄1218.8%
812.5%
🎉812.5%
👻710.9%
💘69.38%
🔥69.38%
🆒57.81%
🤯46.25%
34.69%
🤩34.69%
💅11.56%
🕊11.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2024 to 13 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Jan 2025, 08:08 UTC602 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

ㅤ 𝗦𝗢𝗖𝗜𝗔𝗟 UPDATE ⸺ 𝗪𝗘𝗜𝗦𝗦 さ ‘ #liechkq / gram 🗯 всем привет ! как вы знаете вчера в тг сломались все боты но знаете я даже рада потому что халтурю от работы, дуров устроил мне выходной ! спасибо дуров от чистого сердца 😇😇 а еще я доделала практически все заказы, а вы как работаете при поломке ботов?

5

9 Jan 2025, 12:53 UTC535 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

ㅤ 𝗧.M𝖤 / ACCOUNT ( 信息⏱ ) 𝗨𝗣𝗗𝗧 ★ ⸺ #coups & new post 💭 ' biography : карат 너는 내 유일한 사랑🙂. 𝗪𝗘ISS PROJECT

🤯42🔥2🕊1🤩1

9 Jan 2025, 12:34 UTC413 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

ㅤ 𝗦𝗢𝗖𝗜𝗔𝗟 UPDATE ⸺ 𝗪𝗘𝗜𝗦𝗦 さ ‘ #liechkq #mio_chland / gram 🗯 всем привет ! сегодня мы с мио были на катке, было очень весело и я падала на каждом шагу а мио с меня смеялась !!! зато было очень весело и мы хорошо провели время 🥹

🆒5💘3🔥2🤩2

5 Jan 2025, 16:21 UTC356 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

ㅤ 𝗧.M𝖤 / ACCOUNT ( 信息⏱ ) 𝗨𝗣𝗗𝗧 ★ ⸺ #luniTy & new post 💭 ' biography : call the number #838995 너는 내 유일한 사랑🙂. 𝗪𝗘ISS PROJECT

3🎄2🔥2💅1

1 Jan 2025, 17:37 UTC349 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

ㅤ 𝗦𝗢𝗖𝗜𝗔𝗟 UPDATE ⸺ 𝗪𝗘𝗜𝗦𝗦 さ ‘ #liechkq / gram 🗯 всем привет ! сегодня я отхожу от нового года, а ещё меня приняли в админы кагаяки ! теперь я стажер, а у вас как дела ?

🎉5🎄2💘2

1 Jan 2025, 17:25 UTC260 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

ㅤ 𝗦𝗢𝗖𝗜𝗔𝗟 UPDATE ⸺ 𝗪𝗘𝗜𝗦𝗦 さ ‘ #Viassana / gram 🗯 Приветик! Как у вас дела? Я вот приехала к двоюродной сестре, а до этого обьелась оливье и мандаринов🤫

🎄5🎉1💘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Th3Weiss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 851,985 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ᅠ 星号💬 – 𝗧.𝖧𝖤 / 𝗪𝗘ISS!” (@Th3Weiss), 53 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Th3Weiss.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.