سڵاو …..، هەرکەس ئارەزوی فێربوونی زمانی تورکی دەکا و دەیەوێ بە ئاسانترین شێوە لە ماڵەوە بە پێی کاتی خۆی و بە پارەیەکی کەم فێر بێ ئەوا مەسج بۆ ئەم ئەکاونتە بنێرێ بۆ دەستکەوتنی زانیاری زیاتر ئەوش یوزەرم @sanararaz
👍12❤2
Signed ミ𝐦𝐚𝐟𝐲𝐚"m⃠ミ🖤!

Channel
@Textkurd1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
797subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001193940163 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Textkurd1 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Textkurd1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:50 | 797 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 798 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:42 | 798 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 September 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 November 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
54 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 34 | 63.0% | |
| ❤ | 17 | 31.5% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 3.70% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 September 2022 to 16 November 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
سڵاو …..، هەرکەس ئارەزوی فێربوونی زمانی تورکی دەکا و دەیەوێ بە ئاسانترین شێوە لە ماڵەوە بە پێی کاتی خۆی و بە پارەیەکی کەم فێر بێ ئەوا مەسج بۆ ئەم ئەکاونتە بنێرێ بۆ دەستکەوتنی زانیاری زیاتر ئەوش یوزەرم @sanararaz
👍12❤2
Signed ミ𝐦𝐚𝐟𝐲𝐚"m⃠ミ🖤!
https://t.me/awenedlm
Signed ミ𝐦𝐚𝐟𝐲𝐚"m⃠ミ🖤!
Sticker, posted without a caption
👍3
Signed دليكي ماندو
☺️
👍4❤2
Signed دليكي ماندو
😕😞🌚
👍2
Signed دليكي ماندو
❤️🌚
👍3
Signed دليكي ماندو
نازانم ئاخر بۆچی دڵ ئاوا گێلە بۆچی ئاوا نەزانە کە سور سور ئەزانێت خۆشی ناوێت کەچی دڵ هەر ئەوی دەوێت..💔..🥀..
❤4👍3
Signed دليكي ماندو
🩸 𝗧𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗺'𝘀 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗕𝗲𝗮𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗳𝘂𝗹 🩸 𝗝𝗼𝗶𝗻 𝗔𝗹𝗹 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗹𝗹𝘀 🩸 𝗥𝗘𝗡’𝙨 𝙫𝙞𝙥 𝙡𝙞𝙨𝙩 https://t.me/X4af4t سهرهتا ئهمانه جۆین بكهن🌚🍓👇🏻. 🩸• @xakytal خاكی تاڵ 🩸• @animee40 ئەنیمی 🩸• @X4af4t خەفەت 🩸• @ph0to40 فۆتۆ ٠🎶🎶🎶🎶🎶🎶🎶🎶 🩸• @estambulii ئەستەمبوڵی 🩸• @X4af4t خەفەت 🩸• @animee40 ئەنیمی 🩸• @jihany_zard جیهانی زەرد 🩸• @ph0to40 فۆتۆ 🩸• @xakytal خاكی تاڵ 🩸• @brwa_daran بڕواداران 🩸• @dlbary_nazdarm دڵبەری نازدارم 🩸• @xawny_kchek خەونی…
❤7👍7😁1
Signed 𝘳𝘦𝘯 𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘵 🖤
Voice message, posted without a caption
Signed ᗪɪꪗᎯ"ℳ 𓆩💛⃤𓆪
وەرە بەدڵی خۆت شت بدزە!💅🏿🖤
Signed eva list"🩸
بۆ جهماحهتی پاش شهو12🤤🔞
❤1
Signed abom list🖤!
𝑳𝒊𝒔𝒕 𝑺𝒉𝒂𝒓𝒌 𝑽𝒊𝒑 400𝐊 !💚 جــوانـترین کەنـالەکانی تێلی گرامم 💚! گروپے چاتے 💛• : @promesii 𝐒𝐀𝐑𝐎𝐊 𝐋𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐓 @Sharkmm 🤺! 𝐉𝐨𝐢𝐧 𝐀𝐥𝐥 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐥𝐬 !🪐 ●━━━━━♥️━━━━━● 🎟•► @promesii : ستۆڕی 🎟•► @xawnakam_l_m خەونەکانم 🎟•► @BaXteTOh بەختی تۆ 🎟•► @Bunntt بوونی تۆ 🎟•► @sanfu4ra سەنفورە 🎟•► @So0fiim سۆفیا 🎟•► @sh4nshin شانشین ●━━━━━♥️━━━━━● ✦🩸5𝐊 𝗦𝗨𝗕𝗦𝗖𝗥𝗜𝗕𝗘𝗥𝗦🩸✦ 🍥•► @INFINITY12323 ئیـنفنیتی 🍥•► @Balenakani بەلێنەکانی 🍥•► @Drokain_TO درۆکـانی…
❤1
Signed 𝑳𝒊𝒔𝒕 𝑺𝒉𝒂𝒓𝒌 𝑽𝒊𝒑
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Textkurd1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 701,674 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Textkurd1 named 69 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
19 more handles are in this same list but not shown individually here — capped at 50.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“﮼نازەنینی،،ئیشق🤎🧿.” (@Textkurd1), 797 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Textkurd1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.