Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Катализатор

Channel

Катализатор

@TetradSmekha

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,214subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002678668287
TypeChannel
Username@TetradSmekha
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TetradSmekha

Growth

2,2112,2142,212.56 August 2026 — 2,212 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,212 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,211 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,214 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,211–2,214 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:582,214+3
9 Aug 2026, 23:352,211-1
6 Aug 2026, 18:152,212no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:042,212first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 7 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

440 reactions across 11 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥16337.0%
14232.3%
👍6314.3%
🤯194.32%
132.95%
🫡102.27%
😱81.82%
custom 526059525403732634471.59%
😢40.909%
🤡40.909%
🆒20.455%
🌭20.455%
😈20.455%
🤔10.227%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 440reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 7 January 2026 to 19 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 11 we hold a reading for · 45%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TetradSmekha. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 January 2026 to 19 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Jun 2026, 07:28 UTC≈1,750 views51 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Большая часть эпистолярного наследия Бенсона (особенно, множественные письма интимного характера и переписка с любовниками) была уничтожена его братом, оставшийся же архив, частично вошедший в двухтомную биографию, написанную иезуитом Сирилом Мартиндейлом, представлен в тщательно цензурированном виде. Поэтому многие интересные письма, в которых литература обсуждается в самых свободных терминах, изобилуют изъятиями. Н

🔥21👍1664🆒2custom 52605952540373263442

19 Jun 2026, 03:21 UTC≈1,540 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😱8😢4🤯2

19 Jun 2026, 03:19 UTC≈1,610 views55 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Действия «Князя мира сего» разворачиваются в начале XXI века, мире, грубо и незатейливо разделённом на три фракции: коммунистическую Европу, Восточную Империю (абсолютно сюрреалистический евразийский союз всех формально восточных стран, России, и даже стран Океании) и Ватикан, который получил полный контроль над изолированным от внешнего мира стеклянным куполом Римом («Зелёная стена» у Замятина возникла не на пустом

🔥2313👍12🤯4🤡2🤔1

19 Jun 2026, 03:11 UTC≈1,290 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

74😈2

19 Jun 2026, 03:11 UTC≈1,650 views47 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Ч. 5 Из всей плеяды многочисленных событий последних нескольких месяцев трудно выделить одно, заслуживающее наибольшего внимания, поэтому мы прокомментируем тенденции, наиболее близкие к нашему непосредственному профилю, посвятив серию постов, в рамках нашего католического цикла, подспудной религиозной природе происходящего на примере книги, которую незаслуженно обходят стороной. Трудно не заметить, насколько силь

🔥2211👍93🤡2

10 Feb 2026, 16:20 UTC≈8,140 views144 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026

🍾 Админ 1 наконец-то залил видос по Рязанову и Гайдаю. Смотрим, ставим лайки, оставляем комментарии. ❤️

73🔥37👍22🫡10🌭2

7 Jan 2026, 02:56 UTC≈6,680 views38 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

А вот, чем стоит заняться, так это вернуться, после того, как мы объяснили вкратце, о чём снимал Дрейер, к теме, которую мы уже успели поднять в одном из предыдущих постов: кто пустил о нём гадкий слушок о каком-то мистическом «гомосексуализме» и попытался запятнать его посмертную славу. В посте выше мы выяснили, что этим человеком был Морис Друзи – французский кинокритик, работавший в Дании с дрейеровскими архивами.

🔥1813🤯7

7 Jan 2026, 02:15 UTC≈4,790 views15 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

И вот, что очень важно понимать про оптику, которую использует Дрейер в своих поздних картинах: мы уже упомянули первый брак Гертруды, в котором «Фиделио» так и не был разыгран, и это поле теологических парадоксов и становится основой его творческого метода позднего периода (начиная с «Дня гнева», где это подчёркивается жуткой сценой любовных разговоров между мачехой и пасынком у гроба отца). Приём, в некотором смысл

🔥93custom 52605952540373263442🤯1

7 Jan 2026, 02:11 UTC≈3,190 views25 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Помимо утратившего своё значение и забытого бергсонизма, можно было бы привести другой пример – зороастризм. Так, одним из бергсонистов «Четырёх дьяволов» был очень интересный мистический рунолог, Сигурд Агрелл, который связывал некоторые аспекты рунической письменности с авестийскими священными текстами, а германское язычество – с митраизмом. То есть, если несколько упростить саму концепцию – скандинавский зороастри

11🔥10🤯3👍1

7 Jan 2026, 02:08 UTC≈2,560 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Теперь, необходимо сделать отступление и сказать пару слов о слое фильма, который посвящён внутренним проблемам регулярного шведского масонства живописуемой в фильме эпохи. Фильм основан на одноименной драме Яльмара Сёдерберга, и всё, что пишут о фильме сводится к тому, что Дрейер остался под впечатлением после прочтения публикации об автобиографическом подтексте в произведении Сёдерберга, и его неудачном романе с М

🔥123🤯2custom 52605952540373263441

7 Jan 2026, 02:06 UTC≈2,850 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ч 4.2 Прежде, чем приступить к полноценному продолжению католического цикла, хотелось бы закончить наше «киноведческое отступление», в рамках которого я посвятил несколько постов Карлу Дрейеру, так и не рассказав главного: о чём же «Гертруда», и почему этот фильм оказался таким провокационным, и попал под шквал гневной критики со стороны французской прессы после своего показа в Париже в кинотеатре Le Reflet Medicis

🔥114👍3custom 52605952540373263442

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @TetradSmekha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 735,090 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Катализатор” (@TetradSmekha), 2,214 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TetradSmekha.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.