3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 311–312 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Aug 2026, 10:46
312
+1
6 Aug 2026, 22:18
311
no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:07
311
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
84.9%
avg views ÷ 312 subscribers
Avg views / post
265
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.65%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held
16 (8 June 2026 – 30 July 2026)
Views total
1,590
Reactions total
58
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 22:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
121 reactions across 13 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5203971573437964150
31
25.6%
🔥
23
19.0%
💋
15
12.4%
❤🔥
13
10.7%
custom 5204388919705085528
10
8.26%
💔
9
7.44%
custom 5456164124549454257
8
6.61%
🐳
4
3.31%
custom 5429365839314830135
2
1.65%
custom 5429507440091612100
2
1.65%
💯
2
1.65%
custom 5206560755817678015
1
0.826%
🗿
1
0.826%
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 121reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Итак. Сессия полностью закрыта!
Практику закончил на 5, даже с тем учётом, что меня отправили на переделку проекта из-за отсутствия графического интерфейса!
Пока пытаюсь восстановиться от прошедшего месяца и набраться новыми силами.
Помимо этого, решил проверить свое зрение, ибо с последнего обследования прошло около четырех лет. На удивление, зрение не просело, осталось таким же (л:-1.5; п:1).
Так что как то таа…
Я успел переписать первую главу!
»»»————————————«««
Имея на руках два варианта главы, могу сказать, что критика была невероятно обоснована. Появилась та самая живость, которой прям не хваталась. Первый вариант был чересчур нагромождён сложными конструкциями, невнятной линии персонажа и прочие, и все это давила на читателя. Теперь я это понимаю, спасибо прекрасному человеку, что дал мне такой подзатыльник. Только в…
ДА ГДЕ ЭТА ВАША ПРИБЫЛЬ? 🚬
»»»————————————«««
Кто следит за ТГК-а знает, что несколько месяцев назад я открывал ИП и начинал что-то около бизнеса. Но что же с ним произошло? И почему нет новостей... Начнем.
Развернуть 💬
Дело в том, что бизнес того, загнулся немного. А причина до нельзя проста — нет прибыли. А почему же? Так тут все тоже до нельзя просто — идея конструктора для ДНД узко специализирована и особо в…
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Terra_Corp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 332,177 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Terra Corp” (@Terra_Corp), 312 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Terra_Corp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
