Channel
@TencentSecurity
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
285subscribers
+12 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003396923653 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @laiduba @TencentSecurity |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 25 December 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TencentSecurity |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 285 | +12 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 273 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 25 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
18 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 44.4% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 38.9% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 11.1% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 5.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 25 December 2025 to 29 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
福利来钱包 信息收集 首先 网站有 img1.shjyzn.com qb.h8h43.com 网站： img1.shjyzn.com 加了CF 子域 www.shjyzn.com （模版网） 47.121.184.188 阿里云服务器 301.xg805.com 服务器 ：149.88.88.163 111.173.82.236:3306 PS：数据库 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 以下为bot内部抓取到的域名 aliyun.xg805.com apisdk.xg805.com oss.xg805.com www.xg805.com 钱包内某个后台： yx.xg805.com （加了MCF验证逻辑） 账号： admin 密码： 123 PS：TM这种弱密码？这么不把大家放眼里？ ———————————————— 后台不止一个 本人纯挖着玩 有懂的大佬可以分享一下技术
👍2
pg官方接口 https://www.pgsoft.com 21世纪了还有人不知道吗 遇到黑台子请联系我 我可以拉去api 查看是否为官网接口
相对于富贵娱乐 我会义无反顾地选择“V6哈希” 因为只有他会给我想要的答案
❤3👍3
我只需略微出手就已经是推广的天花板了 😂 🤔做代理链接 🤔 🤔年关将至做推广努力赚钱🤔
闹呢哥哥 当印钞机了 ❤️V6哈希诚招代理❤️ 🤔年关将至 不赚钱怎么行🤔 🤔招商链接：发财 🤔 ❤️官方bot ❤️
V6 trx能量租用功能，价格全网最低，多种套餐可选，可自动续能量笔数。直接用平台余额购买能量，以后大家买能量直接在平台上买就行了
没意思 富贵论坛我还以为多高质量呢😂 一群跳梁小丑罢了
🤣2👎1
当我看见黑富贵的吃到888u的时候 我只能说寒心 我刚来富贵论坛的时候就开始支持富贵 富贵有什么需求我都尽心的去做 富贵招公群代理的时候我二话没说就去当了 有认识我的应该知道 那时候挑战10u上100u 给兄弟们发红包 我一直都是垫付的红包钱 一天就拉200个客户 因为我觉得富贵会带我赚钱 当富贵说要做图的时候 我马上就去做了 不值1688吗 没事 我觉得是我做的不够好 结果他妈到头来 压根就没有正眼看过我 他妈的给黑粉888u 我这种真心付出的人什么都得不到
❤4👍2
羊毛就是这样薅的
依旧300本 到1025 吃肉
❤1
本金300 翻一倍就下分 随便提款的家人们，每天不多赚，赚点零花钱
上分50u 打到190u下分 水还不多吗兄弟们 发洪水了
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @TencentSecurity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 950,225 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TencentSecurity” (@TencentSecurity), 285 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TencentSecurity.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.