Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

محمود كوكة | Mahmoud Kokeh

@TechWithKok

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

945subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001777333612
TypeChannel
Username@TechWithKok
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TechWithKok

Growth

9457 Aug 2026, 02:01 — 945 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 12:36 — 945 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 02:017 Aug 2026, 12:36
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 944–946 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 12:36945no change
7 Aug 2026, 02:01945first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 24 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
39.2%
avg views ÷ 945 subscribers
Avg views / post
371
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held10 (24 June 20264 August 2026)
Views total2,964
Reactions total92
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 02:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

115 reactions across 10 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5043.5%
💯2420.9%
🔥1412.2%
👍97.83%
👏97.83%
❤‍🔥43.48%
21.74%
🆒10.87%
🎉10.87%
👌10.87%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 115reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 06:06 UTC177 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

هذا ليس التحول الرقمي❗️ ما رح احكي عن تطبيق النتائج وشو صار مبارح، لأنو الخلل صار واضح للكل، والحلول التقنية انحكت عشرات المرات. مشكلتي الحقيقية بشي تاني كيف منتج بهالحساسية انسمحله يطلع للناس وهو مو جاهز؟ بغض النظر عن الجهة اللي نفّذت المشروع، صار خطأ واضح بالتنفيذ، وخطأ أكبر لما تم اعتماد المنتج وإطلاقه بهالحالة. في معايير أساسية لازم يحققها أي تطبيق متل هاد قبل ما ينزل عالسوق: اختبارات ضغط حقيقية، مراقبة وا

💯11👍2🔥2

3 Aug 2026, 05:52 UTC284 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

هل صار الـMVP الاسم المحترم للمنتج السيئ؟ اليوم عم نشوف مشاريع بتقدّم تجربة سيئة أو منتج شبه غير قابل للاستخدام… ولما تسأل عن السبب، بيكون الجواب: لأنو لسا MVP لا يا اخي شو دخل ؟😂 ومع تكرار هالحجة، بلشت تتكوّن فكرة خاطئة انو الـMVP هو منتج ناقص، سريع، وجودته منخفضة… وإنو المستخدم لازم يتحمّل مشاكله لأنو "أول إصدار". مع إنو مفهوم الـMVP من أبسط مفاهيم بناء المنتجات، لكنه كمان من أهمها. الـMVP متل ما بنعرف هو ا

🔥8👏32

28 Jul 2026, 08:36 UTC366 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

من اللحظات الأولى من انتقالي لدور قيادي, كان عندي هاجس داخلي يخوفني بالدور القيادي… مو اتخاذ القرار، بل إخبار الفريق فيه. كيف بوصل خبر سيئ بوضوح، وبنفس الوقت بضل عند حسن ظن الناس اللي معي؟ لهيك حضرت كورس صغير ولطيف على Linkedin Learning بعنوان: Answering Tough Questions as a Leader الكورس بيحكي عن استراتيجيات بسيطة للتعامل مع الأسئلة الصعبة، الأخبار المزعجة، والمعلومات اللي ما فيك تشاركها بالكامل. حبيت الفكرة وقررت

6🔥3👍1👏1

27 Jul 2026, 07:07 UTC554 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ليش ما بنسوق السيارة دوماً على سرعة 1000 km/h ؟ هل لانو السرعة مالها حقيقية ؟ طيب لو جبنا هيك سيارة هل رح تسوقها بهيك سرعة ؟ اكيد لا مو لأنك بتحب توصل متأخر. بس لأنك بحاجة لوقت حتى تفكر و تتخذ قرار, و هاد القرار بدو هدوء و قيادة منطقية مشان ما تخبط بأول حيط 🌚 نفس الفكرة عم تصير اليوم داخل الشركات🤔 الـAI عطى فرق التطوير دفعة كبيرة جداً الكود الي كان يحتاج أسبوع صار ممكن يخلص خلال يومين. الـ Prototype كان يحتاج أ

💯121👌1👍1👏1

25 Jul 2026, 18:29 UTC346 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ميزة Crosscheck الجديدة من LinkedIn📱 الفكرة إنك بتكتب Prompt واحد، وبيعطيك جوابين من موديلين AI مختلفين بدون ما تعرف مين كتب كل جواب، وبعدها بتختار الأفضل وبيكشفلك أسماء الموديلات. بتسلي القصة شوي الصراحة, قاعد عم اتحزر مين المودل الي برد هيك بالعادة و عم تظبط😂 حسّيتها تجربة حلوة للمقارنة بين الموديلات بدل ما نعتمد بشكل عمياني على السمعة أو الـBenchmarks بس, لانو اخر فترة بلشت شوفهم بدون معنى حقيقةً. و في Leaderboa

42🎉1👏1

20 Jul 2026, 05:38 UTC417 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

الشخص الوحيد اللي ما وعدني إنو يحل المشكلة كاملة… هو اللي اخترته. قصة شخصية بسيطة علمتني درس حلو🙏🏻 كيف الموتور علمني درس بالحياة🤣 من فترة صار عندي عطل بالموتور الكهربائي تبعي. وتصليح هالنوع من الموتورات بسوريا مو سهل، لأنو عدد الناس المختصة فيهم قليل 🥲 فبلشت لف من شخص لشخص. الأول شيّك عليه وقلي: "ممكن نصلحه… بس ما منعرف إذا رح يزبط." الثاني قلي إنو التصليح بده مبلغ كبير جدًا، لدرجة صرت فكر إنو أغيّر الموتور كا

8👍5👏2💯1

17 Jul 2026, 12:37 UTC384 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

شو برأيك بيميز الشخص الـ Remarkable؟🤔 أنهيت مبارح كورس صغير وخفيف على LinkedIn Learning خلال استراحتي 😄 Think different, be remarkable: Nine ways to lead and inspire رغم انو ما اخدت فائدة جديدة كتير من الكورس, لكن الفائدة كانت إنه أعطاني تأكيد إني ماشي بالطريق الصح، وإن هالمبادئ فعلاً إلها أثر ومو مجرد قناعات شخصية. كم نقطة حبيتهم وحسيت إنهم يستحقوا المشاركة: • لا تتهاون بأنك تظهر بشكل مميز و خلي هالشي يظهر بكل

5👏1🆒1

15 Jul 2026, 06:13 UTC436 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

كيف تقوّي مهارات الـ Soft Skills عن طريق LinkedIn؟ ميزة للجماعة الزناكيل يلي معهم LinkedIn Premium 🫣😂💵 جربت ميزة AI Role Play الجديدة، واخترت سيناريو التفاوض مع المدير. الفكرة بسيطة: بتحدد نوع المحادثة يلي بدك تتدرّب عليها، وLinkedIn بيولّد شخصية للطرف الثاني مع أسلوب واضح بالتعامل. مثلاً: مدير هادئ ومباشر، بيركز على الميزانية، الأداء، والأرقام. بعدها بتبدأ محادثة صوتية فعلية مع الـ AI، وهو بيرد عليك بناءً على

4❤‍🔥2

11 Jul 2026, 07:35 UTC551 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

بوست متأخر... لكن من المشاركات الجميلة 👍 تشرفت بالمشاركة كمحاضر في فعالية «صُنّاع» بجلسة بعنوان: "أدوات الإنتاج الرقمية وبناء المنتجات" حكينا فيها عن عدة محاور، أهمها: • الفرق بين عقلية بناء المنتجات و عقلية بناء البرامج. • أهم المفاهيم والمصطلحات في عالم الـ Product Management. • كيف تتكامل أقسام الشركة، وكيف يؤثر التواصل بينها على نجاح أي منتج. • الأدوات التي تساعد على بناء بيئة عمل أكثر تنظيماً وفعالية. •

9🔥1

24 Jun 2026, 10:49 UTC758 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

11❤‍🔥2

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @TechWithKok. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 834,124 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“محمود كوكة | Mahmoud Kokeh” (@TechWithKok), 945 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TechWithKok.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.