Channel
@Teameaglesignal
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
305subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001839889801 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Teameaglesignal |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Teameaglesignal |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:27 | 305 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:48 | 308 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 308 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 September 2025 to 30 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#IO Channel Retest in Progress👨💻 The token is ready to rebound from the upper border of the descending channel on the 2D chart🔍 The former resistance is now being tested as support, which is crucial for trend continuation🧐 Target levels: 🎯 $0.19 🎯 $0.26 🎯 $0.38 🎯 $0.51 🎯 $0.67
📢 Advertising in this channel You can place an ad via Telega․io. It takes just a few minutes. Formats and current rates: View details
Enjoy our content? Advertise on this channel and reach a highly engaged audience! 👉🏻 It's easy with Telega.io. As the leading platform for native ads and integrations on Telegram, it provides user-friendly and efficient tools for quick and automated ad launches. ⚡️ Place your ad here in three simple steps: 1 Sign up 2 Top up the balance in a convenient way 3 Create your advertising post If your ad aligns with o…
#CAKE Symmetrical Triangle Retest Playing Out👀 PancakeSwap is pulling back to the broken triangle resistance on the weekly timeframe for confirmation🔍 Retest hold + trend continuation = second-chance entry opportunity💁♂️ Price targets: $4.50 → $10.00 → $25.00🚀 Retests separate weak hands from smart money📝
#FLOKI Descending Channel Setup Forming👀 The token is carving out a clean descending channel on the daily chart with precise touches🔍 Channel compression + support defense = reversal momentum building💁♂️ Target levels: $0.000078 → $0.000097 → $0.000110 → $0.000124 → $0.000155 → $$0.000200🎯 This is the pattern that catches retail off guard🚀
#SEI Descending Channel Rally Building🔍 The token is trading inside the channel pattern on the 3D timeframe, with volume starting to spike👨💻 Support zone hold + momentum shift = breakout wave incoming🐃 Target levels: $0.27 → $0.36 → $0.52 → $0.74 → $1.10🎯
#BTC Perfect bounce off the S/R Trendline💁♂️ You know what's coming🤔 Bullish🚀
Spot Bitcoin ETFs are currently experiencing net outflows, a pattern that has historically coincided with local market lows as investor sentiment cools. These periods of outflows often reflect temporary risk aversion and profit-taking. However, once flows begin to stabilize or shift back into positive territory, it typically signals renewed demand and the early stages of a potential trend recovery.
💰 #ETH Short-Term Setup Accumulating below $4k Key Level in the form of Symm. Triangle👀 Looking for a break back above the Support Zone📈 🎯1 Target: $4560 🎯2 Target: $4800
🚨 $AVNT / USDT — Strong Reversal Setup! 💥 Price has bounced off a key demand zone + breaking out of a falling wedge 📈 Structure suggests a potential bottom formation with bullish momentum building 🧠 🎯 Targets: 1️⃣ $0.8739 2️⃣ $1.1849
#ETH/USDT ANALYSIS ETH is consolidating within the symmetrical triangle pattern while trading inside the Ichimoku Cloud. A solid breakout or breakdown of the pattern will be key to confirming the next major directional move.
#JASMY Holding Critical Channel Support Zone💎 Price maintaining position above the descending channel lower boundary with bullish signals emerging on the 2D timeframe👨💻 Target levels after successful bounce: 🎯 $0.014 🎯 $0.019 🎯 $0.023 🎯 $0.032 Position while others doubt. Profit while others chase📈
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Teameaglesignal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 739,371 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Whalse News 🐳” (@Teameaglesignal), 305 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Teameaglesignal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.