Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Tava Griba - Vēstules

@TautasGriba

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

49subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001708646192
TypeChannel
Username@TautasGriba
Created10 September 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TautasGriba

Growth

495049.57 August 2026 — 50 subscribers10 August 2026 — 50 subscribers14 August 2026 — 49 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 49–50 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:1549-1
10 Aug 2026, 11:4550no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:0050first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 11 September 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 November 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

17 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
741.2%
👍741.2%
🔥211.8%
👏15.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2022 to 18 November 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Nov 2022, 17:51 UTC294 viewsread 10 August 2026

Через 10 минут! Эфир с Юлией, где расскажем истории из избирательных комиссий, и что же значит ответ на наши письма. Присоединяйтесь по ссылке: https://www.facebook.com/julijamitina

18 Nov 2022, 11:34 UTC278 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Здравствуйте! Приношу извинения за задержку с ответом на тему выборов, и комментариев к полученным ответам от CVK. Сегодня в эфире с Юлией Карклиней и Каспарсом Ласисом поговорим о том, что происходило на участках, об ответах CVK и как их понимать, и что можно делать дальше. Эфир СЕГОДНЯ в 20:00 на странице Юлии: https://www.facebook.com/julijamitina

22 Oct 2022, 16:55 UTC323 viewsread 10 August 2026
Voice message

Комментарий по поводу ответов из CVK об отправленных им указах

29 Sept 2022, 11:43 UTC249 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Рекомендую всем к просмотру серию документальных фильмов ЕВРОПА: ПОСЛЕДНЯЯ БИТВА EUROPA: THE LAST BATTLE

👍1

29 Sept 2022, 11:43 UTC370 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @GinieGi

ВСЕ СЕРИИ ФИЛЬМА «ЕВРОПА: ПОСЛЕДНЯЯ БИТВА» Эту информацию обязан изучить и проверить для себя каждый. Документальный фильм «Европа: последняя битва» (2017). Швеция. "ИСТИННАЯ ИСТОРИЯ МИРА. С середины 20 века мир слышал только одну сторону самой ужасной войны в истории человечества. Сегодня мы живем в мире победителей этой войны, и без объективного, рационального и сбалансированного взгляда на нашу историю мы обр

👍1

22 Sept 2022, 08:48 UTC391 viewsread 10 August 2026

Если у вас в семье есть мальчики и молодые люди, или даже мужчины, и вы не хотите, чтобы они стали пушечным мясом для защиты чьих-то коммерческих интересов, то вы можете сделать следующее. Алгоритмы одинаковые как на Украине, РФ, Латвии, США, Зимбабве - во всех странах, которые состоят в МВФ. Вам только нужно приложить чуточку усилий. 1) Преисполнитесь духа посмотрев это видео: https://www.instagram.com/tv/Ca-XP5pgp

22 Sept 2022, 08:38 UTC237 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Ровно как и т.н. «Латвийская Республика». Соответственно, в коммерции договариваются, либо отказываются от сделок. Как это сделать сейчас поделюсь ссылками.

22 Sept 2022, 08:32 UTC201 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Во-первых, министерство обороны, как и все прочие - это коммерческая фирма, зарегистрированная не только в Uzņēmumu Reģistrs (название говорит само за себя), но и в международном регистре Duns&Broadstreet

22 Sept 2022, 08:30 UTC188 viewsread 10 August 2026

Вторая новость связана с первой. «Принудительная» военная служба для молодых людей начиная со второй половины следующего года. Это тоже оферта. Никакой «принудиловки» нет, как и все - это завязано на воле каждого.

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @TautasGriba. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Tava Griba - Vēstules” (@TautasGriba), 49 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TautasGriba.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.