Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

[Рᴀɜдᴀчᴀ]¬ 𝗧𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗩𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆

@Taste_Of_Victory

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

56subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002195364805
TypeChannel
Username@Taste_Of_Victory
Created25 June 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Taste_Of_Victory

Growth

567 August 2026 — 56 subscribers10 August 2026 — 56 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 55–57 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 07:3156no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:1056first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 25 June 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
2
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

11 reactions across 1 post, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5337325763903385660327.3%
custom 5336829622166250786218.2%
custom 5337082153358352713218.2%
custom 530551639429561854619.09%
custom 532111684079611636819.09%
custom 533730581378029215819.09%
custom 535935188950059256519.09%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2024 to 9 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Jun 2026, 07:09 UTC5 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Доброго времени суток, друзья! Сегодня совместный розыгрыш между проектами @st2rsN1ka и @Soft_FlexSF 🫘Призы:🫘 1-е место — 25 звёзд⭐️ 2-е место — 25 звёзд⭐️ 🫘Условия участия:🫘 — быть подписанным на оба канала — находиться в чатах канала 🌸Результаты будут подведены, когда наберётся 65 участников Не уходите из чата и не отписывайтесь до подведения итогов, иначе ваша кандидатура будет исключена из розыгрыша Удачи вам

3 Jun 2025, 11:01 UTC103 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🤩Обо мне: Me:: 𝙎𝙞𝙡𝙫, 𝙎𝙖𝙮𝙤𝙠, #𝐍𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐥 Pseudonym:: Сильва, Сайок Treatment:: She/her 🤩Channel:: https://t.me/+azTDO9JmJwZhZjE6 🤩Anon:: http://t.me/anonaskbot?start=0qeqf

custom 53373257639033856603custom 53368296221662507862custom 53370821533583527132custom 53055163942956185461custom 53211168407961163681custom 53373058137802921581custom 53593518895005925651

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @Taste_Of_Victory. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 826,779 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[Рᴀɜдᴀчᴀ]¬ 𝗧𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗩𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆” (@Taste_Of_Victory), 56 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Taste_Of_Victory.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.