Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TARIX ILMI | Mirzoyev Lazizbek

Channel

TARIX ILMI | Mirzoyev Lazizbek

@Tarixchi_Lazizbek

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

682subscribers

+81 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002985716509
TypeChannel
Username@Tarixchi_Lazizbek
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded29 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Tarixchi_Lazizbek

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

60169564829 August 2026 — 601 subscribers29 August 2026 — 601 subscribers7 September 2026 — 695 subscribers15 September 2026 — 682 subscribers68229 August 202615 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net +81. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 587–709 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 10:38682-13
7 Sept 2026, 16:40695+94
29 Aug 2026, 06:44601no change
29 Aug 2026, 06:00601first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.9%
avg views ÷ 682 subscribers
Avg views / post
163
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held20 (26 August 2026 – 29 August 2026)
Views total1,303
Reactions total80
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 22s
Average length
41s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

135 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥6548.1%
👍2921.5%
🐳1914.1%
👏85.93%
🏆64.44%
👌32.22%
👨‍💻21.48%
🤩21.48%
✍10.741%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 135 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 05:28 UTC68 views16 reactionsread 29 August 2026

🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯 Bugun obunachilarimizga ajoyib yangilikni bo‘lishaman. 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 va 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 oylarida milliy sertifikat imtihoniga kirishni reja qilganlar uchun Breaking news bo'ladi. Ungacha shu postga like bosib tanishlarizga yuborib qo'ying. Bu 📢📢📢 ni o'tkazib yuborish sizni katta yangilildan bexabar qolishizga sabab bo'ladi. @Tarixchi_Lazizbek

🔥6🐳4🏆3👍2🤩1

29 Aug 2026, 03:44 UTC172 views7 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

❗️❗️❗️ BMBA tomonidan e'lon qilingan yagona Tarix fanidan Milliy Sertifikat na'munasidagi test. Shunchaki ideal tuzilgan🔥 @Tarixchi_Lazizbek

🔥3🐳2👏2

29 Aug 2026, 03:02 UTC183 views10 reactionsread 29 August 2026

😘😘😘😘😘😘 ❗️TARIX FANIDAN MILLIY SERTIFAT imtihon savollarining tarkibi: ▪️ Siyosiy tarix - 50-60%; ▪️ Ijtimoiy-iqtisodiy tarix - 10-20 %; ▪️ Madaniy hayot - 10-15 %; ▪️ Amaliy topshiriqlar - 20-25 %. 📣❗️❗️❗️ Darslikdagi mavzularni o‘qish jarayonida shu qismlarga ko‘proq urg‘u berishga harkat qiling. @Taroxchi_Lazizbek

👍5🔥3🏆1🐳1

29 Aug 2026, 02:45 UTC179 views10 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Ta‘tildan so‘ng...😁 @Tarixchi_Lazizbek

🔥5🐳4👨‍💻1

28 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTC179 views10 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Oramizda "O‘gay ona" asrini o‘qiganlar bormi. Shu asar haqida xotiralarimni bo‘lishmoqchiman.

🔥7👍3

28 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC182 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Poll

@Tarixchi_Lazizbek Sharqiy Turk xoqonligini tugatgan davlatni toping.

  1. Tan imperyasi25%
  2. G‘arbiy Turk xoqonligi25%
  3. Arab xalifaligi13%
  4. Uyg‘ur xoqonligi😀38%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

✍1👍1🔥1

28 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC180 views13 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Qarg’alar uchsa, qaraylik… (bu bir afsona emas real voqea) @Tarixchi_Lazizbek

🔥8🏆2👍2👨‍💻1

28 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC160 views11 reactionsread 29 August 2026

#eslatma 💾 Turk xoqonligi mahalliy sulolalar boshqaruvini saqlab qolishdan maqsad: ✅1. Oʻtroq o'lkalarda siyosiybarqarorlikni taʼminlash; ✅2. Iqtisodiy taraqqiyot rivojini to'xtatmaslik; ✅3. Harbiyjihatdan ko'maklashish; @Tarixchi_Lazizbek

🐳4🔥4👍3

27 Aug 2026, 10:11 UTC173 views4 reactionsread 29 August 2026

❗️❗️❗️ 2️⃣1️⃣🔤0️⃣0️⃣ da Attestatsiya uchun bepul darsimiz boshlanadi 📚⏰ Tayyor turinglar! @Tarixchi_Lazizbek

🔥2👍1👏1

27 Aug 2026, 01:33 UTC180 views9 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

#Ish_reja Tarix fanidan 2026–2027 o‘quv yili uchun taqvim-mavzu rejalar. 📅 Umumta'lim maktablari uchun 🏫 @Tarixchi_Lazizbek

🔥4👍3👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Tarixchi_Lazizbek. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTCAnonymous Quiz61 voters

@Tarixchi_Lazizbek Sharqiy Turk xoqonligini tugatgan davlatni toping.

  1. Tan imperyasi25%
  2. G‘arbiy Turk xoqonligi25%
  3. Arab xalifaligi13%
  4. Uyg‘ur xoqonligi😀38%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TARIX ILMI | Mirzoyev Lazizbek” (@Tarixchi_Lazizbek), 682 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Tarixchi_Lazizbek.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.