Channel
@TargetedIndividualsScot
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002219375536 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TargetedIndividualsScot |
| Description | SILENT WEAPONS FOR QUIET WARS |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TargetedIndividualsScot |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:11 | 10 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:00 | 10 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (3 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 20 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
💥 "Remember that time when Hillary Rodham Clinton introduced her friend George Soros and his interest to get involved in US elections?" ..."it has been wiped from existence for the most part. Turns out I found a copy of the file I had archived years ago.Be a real shame if people save and shared this widely. " SOURCE John Macafee TG https://ayetv.substack.com/p/remember-that-time-when-hillary-rodham
CENTER STAGE< 🎥 _The Whites Hats are publicly putting Obama on the center stage for 2024 and and his life corruption and AGENDAS connected to ALL DEEP STATE OPERATIONS< : >TUCKER Carlson coming after Obama as being gay is a very important operation that WILL discredit the OBAMA'S for their next presidential big run _but the EXPOSURE of Obama as a gay President WILL lead to DC Elites and EXPOSURE of the intensional …
I am at a loss for words today… Countless women during Covid had miscarriages and it’s now proven THEY had strong signals their vaccines caused miscarriages, and yet, the world did not stop for a second and grasp what the hell we just learned today. A large scale mass sacrifice to satan himself took place… and in no other reality would this be acceptable—our hearts would break, and those responsible would perish mi…
We ask that you kindly join us in prayer for @ToreSays, who is an incredible friend to ALL. She is such a blessing to ALL, as she gives freely and wholeheartedly. Please pray that the Lord would surround her with peace that surpasses understanding, that He would lift her spirit, and that He would fill her with the strength and endurance she needs at this time. We also ask Him to provide whatever resources, energy, a…
Give him a shot of midazolam - i wonder how many deaths ge caused by being an ignorant moron
🚨 HE BREAKS DOWN IN TEARS IN FRONT OF ALL HIS PATIENTS The former medical director of the Cleveland Clinic, Dr. Daniel Neides, breaks down in tears and apologizes to ALL his vaccinated patients: "I did not provide informed consent... It is ABSOLUTELY DEPLORABLE of me. I apologize to my patients." A top-level doctor who cracks and confesses everything. Too late for apologies, or thank you for finally telling the t…
What if MJ really was an Arch Angel ??? What if the Arch Angelic gestalt is part of the Gone With The Wind operation??? WYKYK
@ToreSays RFK Jr was in Lexington, Ky to announce decertifying an organ procurement organization. https://www.wkyt.com/2026/08/05/hhs-secretary-kennedy-lexington-announce-healthcare-reform-action/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=nextdoor.com&utm_campaign=nextdoor_news
UK news https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/uk-news/nuns-who-abused-children-glasgow-33657938
This woman puts on an absolute MASTER CLASS on identifying crisis actors and the very obvious Psyop that is the “Hantavirus Outbreak” H/T: https://x.com/mjtruthultra/status/2052024141394448414?s=46&t=MoBmRnotGFHuD6pUFj_pKQ 🇺🇸🟨🇺🇸
This isn’t about the people. Again this is not about the people… they got you all wrapped up in things so you stay busy fighting each other instead of looking at what’s really happening. We’re asking people to talk as witnesses. Just share what you’ve seen, what you’ve lived, what you know from your own eyes. No scripts, no teams, no “sides.” The more of us who speak plainly as witnesses, the harder it is for the noi…
Podesta Group > BP Oil > Oil Spill > Ghislaine Maxwell > UN > Terramar > UN Gate > Inner City Press…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TargetedIndividualsScot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,221,509 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TARGETED INDIVIDUALS SCOTLAND” (@TargetedIndividualsScot), 10 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TargetedIndividualsScot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.