哥哥们 今天满了
Channel
金沙洲36D桃桃🍑可🎬
@TaoTao08
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
342subscribers
+322 since we began measuring on 4 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003939268844 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TaoTao08 |
| Created | 4 September 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 4 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TaoTao08 |
Topic
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 4 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Oct 2026, 18:22 | 342 | no change |
| 28 Sept 2026, 12:55 | 342 | -13 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 10:37 | 355 | +171 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 06:40 | 184 | +164 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 17:47 | 20 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 4 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 264.5%
- avg views ÷ 342 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 905
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.093%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 6
- of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (4 September 2026 – 13 September 2026) |
| Views total | 3,618 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Oct 2026, 18:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 8
- Videos
- 2
- Links
- 6
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 31s
- Average length
- 16s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
58 reactions across 2 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😢 | 17 | 29.3% | |
| 💩 | 12 | 20.7% | |
| 😱 | 10 | 17.2% | |
| 👎 | 9 | 15.5% | |
| 🤮 | 8 | 13.8% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 3.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2026 to 13 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Channel name was changed to «金沙洲36D桃桃🍑可🎬»
吃奶吗
【修车桃花榜】https://t.me/gzxcthb 【老师艺名】:#桃桃 【联系方式】:@TaoTao80 【所在位置】:#金沙洲 【验证留名】:宋仲鸡 【验证时间】:9-7 【课程价格】:600P 【颜值身材】:1米6几 很漂亮 🐻很大 应该有d 【服务内容】:课表的可 🐍 【服务态度】:8.9分 【优点缺点】:优点:身材好 多💦。缺点:还是塞车洲! 【推荐程度】:9 【体验过程】:多日未出击,必须选一个好的。在榜单看到桃桃老师很吸引我。约好来到科室,真人跟频道相比相差不大,胸确实大,又白又软。大长腿也是白白的,屁股翘翘的。满意先交水费,桃桃老师很温柔,态度很好,陪浴也细心。看着这具肉体,让人直流口水。上床先吃奶子吃嘴子,老师有反馈,很不错。吃完再交给木子,先舔胸再一路向下,眼神会挑逗人,口技也不错,享受啊。实在忍不住了,戴套女上起手,传教士,后入,一套下来满意出水,大屁股感觉超舒服,反馈也很自然,很棒! 【一键关注桃花…
❤1
金沙洲36D桃桃🍑可🎬 pinned a photo
💐💐💐 开奖了 💐💐💐 联邦~金沙洲桃桃💃🏻福利抽奖🎰 开奖了 抽奖人数:433,抽奖号数:852 1. 射 中得:1p半价券 2. 真不记得【祝福30次】 中得:1p100元券 3. MichaelGarcia(常态陪跑)【祝福30次】 中得:1p100元券 4. BZ 中得:1p100元券 5. 老吴 中得:1p100元券 6. K的备用钥匙_x 中得:1p100元券 抽奖说明: 桃桃 : https://t.me/Gzffol/44770 1.本活动由桃桃赞助,私聊 @TaoTao80 兑奖。 2.开奖后请老师七天内兑券,转让需老师同意。 3.中半价券先拉黑抽奖30天,出击交报告即解。 运气爆棚!热烈祝贺! 福至心灵,终得佳奖。 恭祝荣获奖品,好运常伴。 🔍 杜绝黑幕,点击查看本次开奖全程验证
在线开课🀄
😢17💩12😱10👎9🤮8❤1
🎉 联邦~金沙洲桃桃💃🏻福利抽奖🎰 🎁 奖品清单 • 1p半价券 × 1 • 1p100元券 × 5 📢 参与条件 • 加入 广州佛山联邦出击群(重生版) • 加入 金沙洲36D桃桃🍑 • 加入 广州佛山邦女郎动态榜 • 加入 广州佛山联邦老师榜 • 加入 广州佛山商家榜 • 加入 广州佛山联邦抽奖榜 ⌛ 开奖时间 • 2026-09-09 10:00:00 📜 抽奖说明 桃桃 : https://t.me/Gzffol/44770 1.本活动由桃桃赞助,私聊 @TaoTao80 兑奖。 2.开奖后请老师七天内兑券,转让需老师同意。 3.中半价券先拉黑抽奖30天,出击交报告即解。 ✨ 愿好运常伴大家,祝大家好运!点击下方按钮参与抽奖。
🈳
https://t.me/gzxcthb/16568?single
https://t.me/Fs888p/10471
在线哦
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @TaoTao08. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“金沙洲36D桃桃🍑可🎬” (@TaoTao08), 342 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TaoTao08.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.