Channel
@Talkhand_Siyasi
On this record: Previous handles · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,793subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001006136662 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Talkhand_Siyasi |
| Created | 16 December 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Talkhand_Siyasi |
Recorded in 2019 as “تلخندسیاسی✌️” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 10:38 | 4,793 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:53 | 4,794 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 4,795 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:50 | 4,791 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 4,791 | first reading |
109 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 109 (5 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 48,838 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 05:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 37 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
📛تو سال 89 ، زمانی که احمدی نژاد برای اولین بار همون یارانه معروف ۴۵۵۰۰ رو داد ؛ ارزشش برای یک خانواده 4 نفره برابری میکرد با 99 میلیون تومن در همین الان الان مجموع کالابرگ و یارانه برای یک خانواده 5 میلیون تومنه. 🙈 #تلخندسیاسی 👇 @Talkhand_Siyasi2
🎥 ویدئویی از دیدار وزیر کشور پاکستان با پزشکیان 🙈 #تلخندسیاسی 👇 @Talkhand_Siyasi2
📛دبیر شورای عالی امنیت ملی: تا زمانی که همه شرایط برآورده نشود، تنگه هرمز بسته خواهد ماند پیام ایران واضح است: تنگه هرمز تا زمانی که ایالات متحده به جنگ و محاصره پایان ندهد، داراییهای مسدود شده ایران را آزاد نکند و جنگ در سراسر منطقه از جمله در لبنان و غزه پایان نیابد، بازگشایی نخواهد شد. تا زمانی که همه شرایط برآورده نشود، تنگه هرمز بسته خواهد ماند 🙈 #تلخندسیاسی 👇 @Talkhand_Siyasi2
📛 وزیر دفاع پاکستان: تهران و واشنگتن به نوعی تفاهم نزدیک شدهاند 🗣️ وزیر دفاع پاکستان: اوضاع دوباره به سمت یک توافق یا تفاهم صلح در حال شکلگیری است نشانههای دو سه روز اخیر حاکی از آن است که تهران و واشنگتن به «نوعی تفاهم» نزدیک شدهاند. صلحی پایدار به نفع منطقه خواهد بود. 🙈 #تلخندسیاسی 👇 @Talkhand_Siyasi2
⛔ اولین تصاویر از ۶ متهم پروندۀ قتل حمیدرضا رجبزاده 🔴 #تلخندسیاسی 👇 @Talkhand_Siyasi2
⛔عراقچی: ترامپ که اول جنگ توئیت زد «تسلیم بدون قید و شرط» بعد از ۲۰ روز برای مذاکره التماس میکرد 🔴 #تلخندسیاسی 👇 @Talkhand_Siyasi2
⛔ وال استریت ژورنال: 🔴 ترامپ به یک راهبرد قدیمی علیه ایران روی آورده؛ فشار اقتصادی و تحریم های بیشتر/ او به مشاورانش گفته ترجیح میدهد دستور حملات بیشتر را صادر نکند 🔸ترامپ به یک راهبرد قدیمی روی آورده است، به امید اینکه در جنگ با ایران به نتیجهای جدید برسد: فشار اقتصادی. 🔸او رویکردی مبتنی بر صبر و انتظار برای مشاهده نتایج در پیش گرفته است؛ رویکردی که به تحریمهای اقتصادی و محاصره دریایی بنادر ایران توسط آمریکا…
📛برخی غرفههای بازار پروانه به دلیل بیحجابی تعطیل شد بعد از انتشار کلیپهای جنجالی بازار پروانه 🙈 #تلخندسیاسی 👇 @Talkhand_Siyasi2
📛عراقچی: مقامات خارجی به من گفتند که «شما هم جنگ را بردید، هم دیپلماسی را». بهنظر من ما هم اخلاق را بردیم، هم شرافت را بردیم و هم عزت را. 🙈 #تلخندسیاسی 👇 @Talkhand_Siyasi2
📛 خبرنگار: پاسخی به نتانیاهو دارید؟ ترامپ: «امروز پاسخم را در تروث منتشر کردم. پاسخ دارم، پاسخ خوبی هم هست. روابط ما بسیار خوب است، بله.» 🙈 #تلخندسیاسی 👇 @Talkhand_Siyasi2
📛 ادعای ترامپ درباره ایران: «آنها میتوانند دردسر ایجاد کنند، اما ورشکستهاند و پولی ندارند. ایران کاملاً ورشکسته است؛ حتی حقوق نیروهای نظامیاش را هم پرداخت نمیکند، نرخ تورم آنها ۳۰۹ درصد است.» 🙈 #تلخندسیاسی 👇 @Talkhand_Siyasi2
📛 خبرنگار: تنگه هرمز چه زمانی باز خواهد شد؟ ادعای ترامپ: «همین حالا باز است.» 🙈 #تلخندسیاسی 👇 @Talkhand_Siyasi2
Showing the 12 most recent of 109 posts we hold for @Talkhand_Siyasi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تلخندسیاسی” (@Talkhand_Siyasi), 4,793 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Talkhand_Siyasi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.