Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

The Talk Channel Garden

@TalkChannelSRM

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

140subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001295884768
TypeChannel
Username@TalkChannelSRM
DescriptionL’unico canale a compartimento temporale stagno di divulgazione tramaversale di tutto il creato e oltre. La camera specchio di un posto altrove. Presentazione: https://t.me/TalkChannelSRM/154466 Admin: @Essendem @IlMelone Until next time
Created23 September 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/TalkChannelSRM

Growth

1407 Aug 2026, 20:00 — 140 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 22:30 — 140 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 20:008 Aug 2026, 22:30
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 139–141 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 22:30140no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:00140first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.9%
avg views ÷ 140 subscribers
Avg views / post
15.3
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (7 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total305
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
26,100
Videos
1,790
Links
4,740

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 27s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC11 viewsread 8 August 2026

No tu devi capire che nelle competizioni in cui testiamo chi è biologicamente più avvantaggiato in un’attività fisica alcuni vantaggi non vanno bene perché. Perché uhm. Perché no ecco. No. Non vanno bene

Signed Esse

8 Aug 2026, 12:28 UTC12 viewsread 8 August 2026

Sport competitions are deeply unserious non riusciranno mai a convincermi del contrario

Signed Esse

8 Aug 2026, 12:28 UTC13 viewsread 8 August 2026

Do we ban women with big boobs too now since they have a biological advantage or what

Signed Esse

8 Aug 2026, 12:28 UTC10 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnticapitalistSurrealismPhoto

only french people would ban something that makes a woman look less like a child

Signed Esse

8 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC16 viewsread 8 August 2026

Trans women were invented so people could objectify women & looking woke while doing so

Signed Esse

8 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC19 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Avete presente quella idea che le donne devono essere uhhhhh indipendenti ed emancipate? Quella roba che gira da qualche tempo circa? Che se una donna viene trattata come un oggetto è uhmmmm brutto e misogino? Che esprimere la propria femminilità stando in una posizione di subordinazione è ughhh un cattivo esempio? Presente? Yeah? Possiamo applicarla più specificatamente anche alle donne trans adesso? Please? https:/

Signed Esse

8 Aug 2026, 07:50 UTC16 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnticapitalistSurrealismPhoto

deserved tbh its ai slop

Signed Esse

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TalkChannelSRM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The Talk Channel Garden” (@TalkChannelSRM), 140 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TalkChannelSRM.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.