Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Tabletop Chaos

Channel

Tabletop Chaos

@Tabletop_Chaos

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

201subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 18 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001655732504
TypeChannel
Username@Tabletop_Chaos
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded18 September 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Tabletop_Chaos

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 7 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

201202201.518 September 2026 — 202 subscribers27 September 2026 — 201 subscribers7 October 2026 — 202 subscribers5 November 2026 — 201 subscribers18 September 20265 November 2026
4 measurements spanning 49 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 201–202 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 21:40201-1
7 Oct 2026, 19:16202+1
27 Sept 2026, 08:59201-1
18 Sept 2026, 04:22202first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

92 reactions across 10 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2729.3%
🍓1516.3%
💯1516.3%
🔥1213.0%
🥰66.52%
⚡55.43%
🍌55.43%
👍55.43%
✍11.09%
😁11.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 14 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Sept 2026, 07:36 UTC84 views2 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Как вам големы у гномов? в целом интересно варкрафтом каким то веет) да пехота не сильно отличается но выглядит прикольно) ну и гномиха лидерша оч крутая)

❤2

11 Sept 2026, 11:25 UTC108 views5 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Продолжаю кайфовать от виктрикс) сделал примитивный банер из малярной ленты, плюс в том что форма ограничена вашей фантазией и на месте можно изгибать как нравится) это я не говорю что от производителя можно готовые взять) кто может какой-то скирмиш посоветовать посмотрел spqr и pillage интересно но по одной вунде у миньки за исключением героев.... Чет такое себе правила так и просят собирай коробочки пехоты.... #vic…

🔥3🍌2

6 Sept 2026, 12:31 UTC158 views13 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Открываю детскую книжку и нахожу место где зависает дестракшен, а именно гоблины и некоторые орки😂😂

💯8🍌3✍1😁1

5 Sept 2026, 17:52 UTC152 views5 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Сегодня немного альтернативы) у городов очень грустный набор пехоты почти без вариаций.... Хотя есть парочка очень крутых миниатюр (жрец и зам. сержанта толстенький чел с кулатушкой на плече) именно они продали мне всех остальных) У виктрикса не так давно вышли пешие сержанты у которых есть схожие шлема и в закачке с щитом они идеально подходят на замену или в качестве второй или третьей коробочки в армию для разнооб…

👍5

24 Aug 2026, 18:16 UTC205 views6 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Считай небольшой райончик можно сделать)

🥰6

24 Aug 2026, 18:13 UTC195 views7 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Апок версии аоса) битва двух пьяных дедов) очередная коробка от гв с отдельной игрой) и классным террейном... Гв похоже сделало крутой сет террейна по типу первой редакции варкрая но зачем-то растащила его по разным коробкам 📦 а ведь это мог быть террейн нового сезона варкрая с крутыми руинами города пошёл бы и на мордхейм)

💯7

27 Jul 2026, 15:33 UTC297 views20 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Пусть эти ребята тоже поборяться ⚡за первого и 🍓 за второго) че кстати за культ колеса кто в курсе напишите?)

🍓15⚡5

27 Jul 2026, 15:27 UTC244 views29 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Огонь 🔥 за первого, ❤ за второго. Посмотрим чей огонь более огненный 🤣

❤20🔥9

27 Jul 2026, 15:13 UTC244 views1 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Кто шарит это просто жрец сигмара другая вариация или культ/под культ какой?

❤1

27 Jul 2026, 15:12 UTC182 views4 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Какую же имбищу отсыпали городам🤯 🧙‍♂️маг и боевой поп мое почтение) выглядят как Тима героев в вархаймер квест)

❤4

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @Tabletop_Chaos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Астрахань | Культура | Наука
@Astrakhan_nauch · 23,568
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Tabletop Chaos” (@Tabletop_Chaos), 201 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Tabletop_Chaos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.