First pic in a while! 📸 Not fursuit related this time, but don't worry, fluff is coming soon. 😉 Took this as a test shot and loved it! Let me know your thoughts. 👇

Channel
T.Tarka Photography
@T_Tarka_Photography
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
43subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002293044871 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @T_Tarka_Photography |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/T_Tarka_Photography |
Topic
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Oct 2026, 00:18 | 43 | +1 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 02:40 | 42 | +2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 40 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 38 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:57 | 38 | first reading |
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 3 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
28 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 26 | 92.9% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 7.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2025 to 17 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Made it to NFC a couple days ago! 🎉 Got some awesome pics already, hoping to share at least one today. Just a heads-up, I might not tag the suiter if I don't know their handle. 📸🦊 #NFC
Wanted to do a quick little test before I head out for Nordicfuzzcon. This picture has not been edited ^^
❤5
I am now open for commissions at nfc as well feel free to message me if your interested or if you have a friend that might be interested ^^ see you there
❤2
Allright been wat to long I posted in here really sorry about that had quite some stuff going on but hey besides that here are some pictures from last Nordicfuzzcon featuring amber_ovopack on X
❤2
Been a lil while again sadly work has me keeping busy though last weekend I went to saint croix in France and managed to take these pictures
❤2
for today's walk I decided to bring my professional camera with me and honestly these pictures came out amazing (my wolf dog Vasco)
❤9🔥1
Sadly no more fursuit pics as my hard drive crashed.... But I went on a walk today and managed to make these. Only first one is an edited one as I'm trying my new phone (real camera is still better ;) )
❤6🔥1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @T_Tarka_Photography. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“T.Tarka Photography” (@T_Tarka_Photography), 43 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/T_Tarka_Photography.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.