Channel
@TXAuditNews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,022subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001409423161 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TXAuditNews |
| Created | 7 June 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TXAuditNews |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 1,022 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 1,024 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:06 | 1,024 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
15 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 86.7% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 13.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2025 to 7 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Link is HERE- also goes to other documents I have uploaded. I’m not done going through them. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1O4UgY6uJLs1gjjbK1VarI0YgTrAmm7Eb
❤1
Dear Texans, This is long, but it’s for the people who feel like something has been “off” since 2001, who are watching Texas fill up with data centers, rail projects, and bonds we never really voted on – and wondering why our bills, our debt, and our surveillance keep going up at the same time. I’m going to lay out the pattern I see in plain language. You don’t have to agree with every piece. Just sit with the time…
❤1
• Model how big data centers, “green” hydrogen, and new infrastructure affect the grid. This is the modern version of what Enron was doing: 2001: Enron built the pipes, Patriot Act turned them into a listening device. 2026: Texas builds the AI brains + private power, and new laws/incentives turn them into a predictive control system. ⸻ 4. How this ties into bonds, elections, and your bills None of this is free. …
❤3
Today, that same basic pattern has been scaled up and dropped on Texas: dark fiber, secretive data hubs, AI “brains,” private power plants, grid simulations at our universities, and bond-funded local projects that plug everything together. We’re paying for it with our taxes, our light bills, our kids’ data, and our retirements – while the real control of the system drifts farther away from ordinary Texans. If you’v…
❤3
Please follow us on TRUTH and the convo if you still want to make sure our elections are secure. I miss you guys. https://truthsocial.com/group/texas/posts/115829153875785746
❤2
This is going on STATE WIDE. This is a major issue and we are funding our own demise.
To me, as a parent, that raises very basic questions: • How much data about our kids, our families, and our daily movements is being collected? • Who exactly can see it (district staff, A&M, third-party vendors, law enforcement, others)? • How long is it stored, and for what purposes? • What happens if any part of this system is misused? I’m not asking everyone to panic. I’m asking that we at least acknowledge t…
❤3
7. Why I’m Sharing This With Other Parents I’m not writing this to argue that “technology is bad” or that “safety is fake.” I’m writing it because: • Most of us were told, • “Vote for this, it’s for roads,” • “Vote for this, it’s for teacher devices and kids’ laptops,” • “Support public safety.” • But when you follow the actual documents, those same votes and contracts have: • loop roads encircling the city, …
So from a parent’s eye: • At the ground level, we have: • road bonds (TRIP-22 / Inner Loop East), • school tech bonds (CSISD devices), • Flock cameras on our roads, • county + district cybersecurity run through Texas A&M. • At the upper level, we have: • university supercomputers capable of analyzing huge, complex datasets, • and a 52-acre training city where they rehearse how to manage communities under stre…
6. What Sits “Above” All This – Supercomputers & Disaster City On top of the local stack, remember what Texas A&M already runs in town: 🧠 Supercomputers (HPRC) Texas A&M’s High Performance Research Computing (HPRC) environment includes: • Grace – a Dell-based supercomputer capable of up to 6.2 petaflops, roughly 20× more powerful than the previous lead system, Ada. These systems are advertised as platforms for: …
• Texas DPS is currently investigating Flock Safety over claims it operated without a required private investigator license and went years without proper licensing in Texas. • Nationally, there have been concerns and lawsuits about ALPR systems enabling mass tracking of residents and improper data-sharing with federal agencies.
5. License Plate Cameras – Flock, Education Channels, and Tracking Cars Then there’s the license plate reader cameras. • On December 16, 2025, Brazos County commissioners unanimously approved buying cameras that read license plates for the Sheriff’s Office, for nearly $76,000. • Before voting, there was debate because the cameras were being purchased through an education service center in Austin, not a traditional…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TXAuditNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 404,174 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Texas First Channel” (@TXAuditNews), 1,022 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TXAuditNews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.