Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 38% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
9 measurements spanning 67 days, net +30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 637–750 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Oct 2026, 12:45
682
-12
3 Oct 2026, 06:17
694
-24
17 Sept 2026, 17:01
718
-12
9 Sept 2026, 17:39
730
-7
30 Aug 2026, 13:13
737
+85
23 Aug 2026, 06:15
652
+2
16 Aug 2026, 04:16
650
-2
8 Aug 2026, 02:46
652
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:04
652
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
21s
Average length
21s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
264 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
108
40.9%
👍
45
17.0%
🔥
38
14.4%
😁
37
14.0%
💯
11
4.17%
⚡
8
3.03%
custom 5404835520150773707
5
1.89%
🥰
5
1.89%
🤝
4
1.52%
🙏
3
1.14%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 264 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TRETYAKOVA_MAK. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ПРОСТИТЕ, Я СКАЖУ!
Достали!!! 😤
Эксперты всех мастей, особенно те, кто «помогает заработать» — прекратите ломиться в личку!!!
Не нужно мне предлагать ваши «продукты», марафоны, курсы, движухи, реалити-шоу, диагностики, консультации и прочее!
Ни платно, ни бесплатно, ни за донат, ни тем более безОплатно! 🤦♀️
Ни от чистого сердца, ни потому, что вы почувствовали, что я «свой человек», ни потому, что у меня классн…
СОВСЕМ С УМА СОШЛА 🤦♀️
статистику она ведёт 🙄
Если вы вдруг думаете также и недоумеваете, зачем я веду статистику точности своего стратегического прогноза.
Или если вы понимаете зачем, но вам интересно, а не страшно ли мне, ведь а вдруг статистика будет так себе, что тогда?
Тогда этот пост для вас 😁
Ответ на первый вопрос:
а) из любопытства. Или как выразилась одна прекрасная женщина - "профессиональный зуд" 😁
…
🔔🔔🔔
по пункту А произошли изменения - в эту пятницу точно отбой, очень вероятно, что в следующую пятницу и, возможно, даже в новом здании Третьяковки, а не в историческом (если всё пойдет по плану, а не как вчера 😅)
по пункту Б - 69% цифра июля!!!
Просто обалдеть, уже идет вторая половина года, а процент точности упорно держится на 60+ 👏😱
Честно, я немножко в шоке и всё ещё жду, когда наступит какой-то месяц, где…
Порядок в голове сам себя не наведёт!
Это работа.
Регулярная.
Например, вчера вечером я потратила нормально так времени, чтобы почистить свою телегу от кучи уже неактуальных чатов, ботов, каналов и тд.
Вроде не так давно чистила, а вот опять накопилось.
Так и во всем остальном - пыль на полках, ненужные записи и чеки, одежда, которую перестали носить, уставшие продукты, баночки-скляночки всяких шампуней-кремов, 5…
❗️❗️❗️ОБЪЯВЛЕНИЕ
1️⃣Встреча в Третьяковке прошла прекрасно.
Настолько прекрасно, что ни фото, ни видео 🤷♀️
На следующей неделе, вероятно, тоже проведу, но несколько иначе.
Нужно потестировать ещё одну штуку 😎
Два вопроса к вам:
а. Кто хочет?
б. В какой день могли бы - среда (05.08), четверг (06.08) или пятница (07.08) время - вторая половина дня и до вечера.
Отвечать можно в комментариях или в личку: @TRETYAK…
Пс-пс, Москва!
Срочное сообщение!
Завтра, 28.07 собираюсь в Третьяковку в Лаврушинском переулке.
В рамках работы над своим проектом.
Совмещать приятное с полезным.
Буду там во второй половине дня, после 14:00
Также очень вероятно, что пойду и послезавтра, 29.07, но это не точно и будет зависеть от наличия желающих.
Кто хотел, кто готов, кому интересно не просто посмотреть на картины, но и получить от них ответы…
За последние полгода я сделала 50 прогнозов.
Наблюдая, как разворачиваются события, я поняла три вещи:
– правильный фокус внимания резко повышает шансы на успех в запланированных делах;
– грамотное перераспределение энергии дарит внутреннее спокойствие и ясность, даже если вокруг всё неспокойно и непонятно;
– заранее спрогнозированные негативные события либо проживаются в разы легче, либо их и вовсе получается из…
The shares total 140%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Женщина, которая перестаёт получать внимание от мужчины рядом - или вянет, как цветочек без полива, или переключается на тех мужчин, которые дарят ей это внимание.
Также и с авторами каналов 😅
В общем, вынуждена вам признаться!
Я изменяю вам с Threads 🤣
Но вам не советую.
Зараза такая, ужОс просто 🙈😁
Кстати, расскажите, а вы с кем мне изменяете? Где вы оставляете свои лайки и комментарии?
Знаю, что хрен от вас…
Продолжаем цикл действительно работающих советов от братьев наших меньших 🥰
П. С. обязательно жмякни на картинку, важные подробности внутри 😁
❤10👍6💯4😁2
Signed Ксения Третьякова
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TRETYAKOVA_MAK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 140%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
ТОП 5 ВИН: неожиданный для понедельника и для канала опрос, но совершенно нормальный для ЛЕТА! ☀️
Итак, выбираем своё (или свои) любимые и визуализируем 😍:
Бокал вина по цене крыла самолёта в аэропорту13%
Глинтвейн в термокружке в горах19%
Вино из пластикового/бумажного стаканчика на берегу моря31%
Вино из горла у костра25%
Ледяное игристое на завтрак в отпуске50%
The shares total 138%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПОРЯДОК В ГОЛОВЕ” (@TRETYAKOVA_MAK), 682 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TRETYAKOVA_MAK.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.