Channel
@TRAPF2
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
116subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002193246864 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TRAPF2 |
| Description | Official channel of the Texas Revolutionary Army of Patriot Front! (TRA-PF) Previous channel banned 09/03/2024🪦 TRA-PF archive: t.me/PatriotFrontLink TRA-PF chat: t.me/+DAIfMODOSnwxMDg5 Send activism to @PFTND to get it featured on the channel |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 5 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TRAPF2 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 116 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:57 | 116 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 5 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
329 reactions across 15 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 69 | 21.0% | |
| 🔥 | 49 | 14.9% | |
| 😁 | 48 | 14.6% | |
| 🤡 | 28 | 8.51% | |
| ❤ | 24 | 7.29% | |
| 🍾 | 23 | 6.99% | |
| ⚡ | 21 | 6.38% | |
| 🤬 | 20 | 6.08% | |
| 💅 | 9 | 2.74% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 2.74% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 2.13% | |
| 🌚 | 5 | 1.52% | |
| 👀 | 5 | 1.52% | |
| 💩 | 5 | 1.52% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 0.608% | |
| 🥴 | 2 | 0.608% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.304% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.304% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.304% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 329reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 5 September 2024 to 9 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
To state further, we've made more inroads into the system power structure than groups like PF have even though that was never our goal. The fact we did it better by accident shows to Keith's point about fandoms. As of late, journos have complained about members of government holding sympathies to AWD and/or related subgroup ideology. Yet nothing about groups like PF. Why is that? We have a clear and concise ideolog…
🔥20🤡5
Agents of TRA-PF coincidentally stumbled across derad graffiti out in the wild, and subsequently took appropriate action! Hail TRA-PF!
🍾22🤡4👍1💩1
Looks like Tiny Tom is gonna have to up the sticker tax.
😁25🤡2
Patriot Front loses lawsuit against black man and has to pay $2.75 million because Thomas didn't bother showing up for court. It's a default judgement. https://www.wcvb.com/article/patriot-front-attack-black-musician-lawsuit-boston-massachusetts/63411586 PSA of the day. If someone has a lawsuit against you. Even if you think it's bullshit. Show up to court. You will lose in a default judgement if you don't show up.…
🌚4🤡1😭1
⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 🚨 MOVEMENT ALERT 🚨 🇺🇸⚡️🥊 — Andrew Tate has been spotted with the American conservative group Patriot front in Texas. “Lone Star Active Club” also known as “Patriot Front” recently posted to their telegram page that their members met up in Tennessee, and with them… human trafficker Andrew Tate!
🤣29💅9💩4🍾1🎉1🤡1🫡1
“We National Socialists must never under any circumstances join in the usual hurrah-patriotism of our present bourgeois world.” - Mein Kampf, Vol. II, Ch. 14 (p. 648 Manheim; p. 529 Dalton)
🔥17🥴2🤡1
Sticker, posted without a caption
🥰9🤡2
Thomas Rousseau pled guilty to First Amendment activity. If you plead guilty for marching and chanting you have no right to talk about the First Amendment, and I think its frankly disqualifying in the leadership of an activist group. 1) Expensive suits mean nothing 2) Marching at abortion rallies for a thousand years: nothing 3) Return the bougie suit and shoes, pay your attorney to fight for your right to speak,…
🤣24🤡2👍1
Sticker, posted without a caption
🤣15💯7🤡2😁2
Seems familiar🤔
😁21🤡6👀5❤2🌚1🤣1
Telegram says it will share phone numbers and IPs of 'bad actors' to authorities Article, Comments
🤬10
Telegram will now hand over phone number and IP for criminal suspects Article, Comments
🤬10
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @TRAPF2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 605,041 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TRA-PF” (@TRAPF2), 116 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TRAPF2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.