💡🦌С Новым Годом!🦌💡 🎏Пишите свои поздравления с тегом #2024 под этот пост, Воришки! В течение суток выберем комментатора и отправим 10 $TON 🤭
🔥5👍3👏1
Signed raven

Channel
@TON_Thieves
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
60subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001884266831 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TON_Thieves |
| Description | Чат Воришек - @TON_Thieves_Chat Коллекция - https://getgems.io/collection/ton-thieves |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 29 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TON_Thieves |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 60 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:18 | 60 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 29 September 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 January 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
164 reactions across 15 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 86 | 52.4% | |
| 👍 | 32 | 19.5% | |
| 😁 | 11 | 6.71% | |
| 🎄 | 8 | 4.88% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 4.27% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 3.05% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 2.44% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 1.83% | |
| 🍾 | 3 | 1.83% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 1.22% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.61% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 0.61% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.61% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 164reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 29 September 2023 to 1 January 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💡🦌С Новым Годом!🦌💡 🎏Пишите свои поздравления с тегом #2024 под этот пост, Воришки! В течение суток выберем комментатора и отправим 10 $TON 🤭
🔥5👍3👏1
Signed raven
Трое воришек подобрались к сокровищнице, но лишь один, заручившись силой магической книги и котиком, смог одолеть соперников мощным заклинанием и забрать себе все богатства! 👍 СОКРОВИЩНИЦА ОТКРЫТА!👍 💎СУНДУК ОТКРЫТ!💎 👍 Удачные атрибуты набега: Skull, Silver Cross 💀 Проклятый атрибут: Rope (equipment) 🍀 Всего в коллекции удачных: 19 🍀 Зарегистрировано удачных: 3 📕 Зарегистрировано книг: 19 📚 Призвано воришек книгой: …
🎄3👍2🔥2
Signed raven
🎁 СУНДУК 🎁 Перед самым входом в сокровищницу стоит сундук, о котором нам рассказывали разведчики. На нем 4 замка, каждый из которых открывается кубиком. Пришло время узнать, смог ли кто предугадать каким кубиком открывается каждый замок. Ах да! Вы брали с собой ключи? Тогда один из замков можно открыть ими! В комментарии к этому посту фаундер бросит 4 кубика, результаты которых вы пытались предугадать при подготовк…
👍4🔥2🎄1
Signed raven
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 Отправившиеся в набег были поражены проклятием ТЬМЫ. В кромешной темноте все, кто носил на своем поясе веревку, запутался в ней и не смог идти дальше. А может это была и не веревка вовсе? 💀Проклятый атрибут: Rope (equipment)💀
🔥2
Signed raven
Отряды собраны! Идёт проверка и подготовка результатов, перед которой будет открытие сундука✅
🔥6👍2🎄1
Signed raven
🔥СОБИРАЕМ ОТРЯД🔥 😈 — Мы узнали! Мы узнали! Мы видели ворота! Там точно что-то есть, а на входе стоит большой сундук с четырьмя замками! И на табличке у ворот написано: "МЕСТО ТО ДУРНОЙ СЛАВОЙ СЛАВЯТ, ВОЙТИ ЖЕ СМОЖЕТ ТОТ, КТО И ТУТ И ТАМ, КТО СВЯТ СВЕТОМ ЛУНЫ" 🔮 — Вы что-то поняли? Мы нет, но обязательно поймем! И да, возьмите ключи! Нужно вскрыть тот сундук! Начинаем сбор отрядов. Воришки, у вас неделя чтобы разг…
🔥8🍾3🎄1👍1
Signed raven
Video, posted without a caption
🎄2🤔2💅1
Signed raven
♾ 😁😊😁😁😁♾ 😈 Привет, воришки! Вам не кажется, что мы засиделись? Вы жаждите сокровищ, жаждите богатств. 🌡 Такова наша суть и таково наше предназначение, потому пора воровать! 👑 Мы начинаем второй набег в ручном режиме, пока ожидаем чудо-бота. Правила все те же, но с дополнением. 🔥 Теперь команды собираются удобнее в гугл форму✍️, а помимо открытия сокровищницы каждый из участников может попытаться открыть сундучок🎁, с…
🔥8⚡3👍2
Signed raven
🍭🎃 СЧАСТЛИВОГО ХЭЛЛОУИНА 🎃🍭 Вы все отлично постарались, Воришки! 😈 Надели свои самые жуткие костюмы, рисовали, рассказывали друг другу страшные истории и крали конфеты у наших друзей! 🍭 👁Пришло время вознаградить самых прозорливых, пугающих и креативных из вас.🍲 🕷ИТОГИ: 1️⃣. Генератором чисел мы выбрали победителя конкурса костюмов - TON Thief #150, Его хозяин получает 15 $TON и роль Великий и ужасный 👻 2️⃣. С помо…
🔥7👍3❤🔥1🎉1💯1😁1
Signed raven
Ваш выбор?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed raven
✅Начинаем голосовать за лучшие работы и рассказы наших участников конкурса #страшноталантлив ✅ 1⃣. Рассказ + Рисунок 🌡 2⃣. Рассказ + Рисунок 🌡 3⃣. Рассказ + Рисунок 🌡 4⃣. Рассказ + Рисунок 🌡 5⃣. Рассказ 🌡
Signed raven
Прием заявок окончен 🧛♂
👍6🔥2❤🔥1
Signed raven
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @TON_Thieves. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Ваш выбор?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 29 September 2023 to 1 January 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 729,843 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@TON_Thieves named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TON Thieves 💎” (@TON_Thieves), 60 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TON_Thieves.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.