Channel
@TLG_interview
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
58subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003692240614 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TLG_interview |
| Description | Telegram veterans and experienced users. Contact: @sbuffa Design: @LumoZitrix |
| Created | 17 December 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TLG_interview |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 58 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 58 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 17 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
128 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 45 | 35.2% | |
| 👍 | 28 | 21.9% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 12.5% | |
| 🤡 | 11 | 8.59% | |
| 🍓 | 9 | 7.03% | |
| 💘 | 9 | 7.03% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 3.91% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.56% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 1.56% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.781% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 17 December 2025 to 15 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
7⃣ What is the hardest type of spam to fight? And what practical advice can you give to group administrators? The hardest spam to catch is the kind that isn't sent in mass blasts and involves manually written messages. Detecting AI-generated text isn't difficult, and mass mailings are easy to spot too - but when neither of those signals is present, it becomes a problem. For that scenario there is a report-and-global…
❤6👍4🤔1
🎤 Thanks to @lolsUserbot for accepting the interview, Telegram expert and founder of @LolsBot. ➖➖➖➖ 1⃣ Tell us about your main project, @LolsBot How and when was it created? Was it born out of a necessity? Did other people help you develop it? The project appeared four years ago out of an urgent need for effective tools to fight spammers. I tried various big group admin bots that existed at the time, but none of th…
👍1
💬 Telegram isn't a perfect platform and has a huge problem with OSINT bots and exploits being discovered every day. What are your thoughts on this? Have you ever been threatened as a result of your public role? If so, how did you react? Telegram, like any large platform, is not perfect. Managing and controlling issues such as OSINT bots and emerging exploits at scale is extremely challenging. I believe the platform s…
❤8🤡5🔥4👍2
🎤 Thanks to @starusername for accepting the interview, Telegram expert and founder of @NewsAndTipsNT. ➖➖➖➖ 1⃣ Well Rohan, let’s start with your biggest project: News and Tips. How did it begin? Did you get help from anyone, or was it something you initially built on your own? It actually surprised me how the News and Tips channel grew to become so successful and impactful. The origin of the channel is quite interes…
❤5👍3🔥3
7⃣ Recently, there was a lot of buzz around the news that Nekogram was allegedly collecting users’ phone numbers (and possibly other data). Did you use Nekogram? And do you think this is a risk users should be aware of when using third-party clients, or is it unacceptable and surprising that Nekogram had a “dark side”? I generally do not recommend using unofficial clients. I have tested several of them for evaluation…
❤5👏2🔥2🤡2
1⃣ Nowadays @iDubTG is not very active. In a previous response you mentioned that you stepped away from the project to focus more on your private life. Have you lost some of the passion and curiosity you used to have for Telegram? And would you ever consider coming back to posting in the future? This is a great question that I felt like I didn't address properly on my channel, so I'm going to address it here. As you …
❤4👍4🫡2🔥1
🎤 Thanks to @iDubno for accepting the interview, Telegram old-school insider and creator of @iDubTG. ➖➖➖➖ 1⃣ First of all, tell me how your main channel @iDubTG was born. What was your original goal? Did anyone encourage or push you to create it? At the time, I felt like most Telegram news channels were reporting on the same pieces of information, and that there was nothing really "exclusive" that set any other cha…
❤4🤡2
5⃣ One of the most interesting projects you collaborated on is dictionary.tg. What motivated you to create it, how long did it take to gather all the information, and most importantly, where and how to get the information? dictionary.tg was/is a project that I helped on, providing ideas, etc. The initial idea (not mine) was to have a Wikipedia like structure, but we eventually settled on making a dictionary. There we…
👍1
6⃣ How did the other TSF members react when you decided to leave? && 7⃣ You leaked a significant amount of internal TSF data. After doing so, did you receive any direct or indirect threats from the team? Do you still maintain contact with former TSF members, or did they all turn their backs on you? I didn't leave voluntarily; I was kicked. At first, the team reacted calmly, but after the aggressive leaks, some became…
❤4👍3💯2🔥2🤡2🍓1💘1
🎤 Thanks to @youtyay for accepting the interview, Telegram veteran and ex-TSF. ➖➖➖➖ ⚠️ Message from youtya: First of all, I would like to apologize to any TSF member reading this. I was quite immature back then. While I remain a Telegram critic (though I continue to use it due to a lack of alternatives), I realize now that I should have expressed my opinions regarding Telegram and TSF policy directly to the team an…
👍1
1⃣ Many community-driven projects have been developed on Telegram, and Italians have been busy contributing to the platform over time. Some stand out, such as Group Help, OctoGram, BotsArchive, and so on. What are your favorite projects, both Italian and non-Italian? It's true, the Italian community on Telegram has been surprisingly active over time. Comparatively, there have been many notable Italian projects, somet…
❤4🍓3💘3👍1💯1
🎤 Thanks to @Laky64 for accepting the interview, Telegram expert and founder of PyTgCalls ➖➖➖➖ 1⃣ Let's start with one of your most important projects, PyTgCalls. Tell me a something about how the idea was born, what were the obstacles to overcome, and what or who inspired you to create this library? The PyTgCalls project was born from a concrete need and an enthusiasm shared with some friends. With the introductio…
🍓3💘3❤1💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @TLG_interview. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 837,061 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Telegram interview” (@TLG_interview), 58 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TLG_interview.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.