Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

欧冠 五大联赛 NBA 专业竞彩计划

@TIYU83

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

30,619subscribers

-1,123 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001124748183
TypeChannel
Username@TIYU83
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 31 May 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TIYU83

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@TIYU83/3356 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC@kq978/33045 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC1.00under a minute
@TIYU83/3359 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 04:51 UTC@kq978/33706 Aug 2026, 04:51 UTC1.00under a minute
@TIYU83/3363 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 12:55 UTC@kq978/34076 Aug 2026, 12:55 UTC1.00under a minute
@TIYU83/3367 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 05:23 UTC@kq978/34727 Aug 2026, 05:23 UTC1.00under a minute
@kq978/34867 Aug 2026, 08:34 UTC@TIYU83/3368 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 08:34 UTC1.00under a minute
@TIYU83/3369 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC@kq978/35177 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@kq9786 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (60)
@kqzb85 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (50)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 14 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @TIYU83 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

30,61931,74231,180.57 August 2026 — 31,742 subscribers8 August 2026 — 31,633 subscribers9 August 2026 — 31,516 subscribers10 August 2026 — 31,102 subscribers11 August 2026 — 30,975 subscribers12 August 2026 — 30,937 subscribers13 August 2026 — 30,804 subscribers14 August 2026 — 30,619 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1,123. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,451–31,910 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 17:3530,619-185
13 Aug 2026, 07:4730,804-133
12 Aug 2026, 05:5430,937-38
11 Aug 2026, 08:2630,975-127
10 Aug 2026, 08:4731,102-414
9 Aug 2026, 11:5231,516-117
8 Aug 2026, 11:5631,633-109
7 Aug 2026, 19:0131,742first reading

Engagement

78 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.00%
avg views ÷ 30,619 subscribers
Avg views / post
307
77 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.248%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
78
of 78 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 77 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held78 (5 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total23,620
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 14:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
19m 23s
Average length
2m 46s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 12 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1292.3%
👏17.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 78 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC133 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

8.15 晚场推荐 009 沙特联 02:00 利雅得新月 🆚 费萨里 主任:让负 HO:全场小3.5 GPS:1-0 2-0 2-1 010 荷甲 02:00 特尔斯达 🆚 鹿特丹斯巴达 主任:胜 HO:特尔斯达-0/0.5 GPS:1-0 2-1 2-0 016 英冠 03:00 狼队 🆚 布莱克本 主任:让胜/让平 HO:全场小2.5 重❤️单关! GPS:1-0 2-0 2-1(防) 017 葡超 03:15 里斯本竞技 🆚 吉马良斯 主任:半全场 胜胜 HO:里斯本竞技-1.5/2 GPS:2-0 3-0 3-1

13 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTC357 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

001 沙特联 00:15 艾卜哈 VS 哈森姆 主任: 胜 亚盘:全场大2.5 比分: 2-1 3-0 002 欧联 01:00 克约大学 VS 库普斯 主任: 让胜/让平 亚盘: 2~3球 比分: 2-0 2-1 003 欧联 01:00 帕佛斯 VS 萨尔茨堡 主任: 胜或平 亚盘: 帕佛斯 +0/0.5 比分: 1-1 2-1

13 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC329 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

【斯基拉:维拉和赫尔城均有意租借尤文前锋戴维,球员视维拉为首选】 据记者斯基拉消息,维拉和赫尔城均有意租借尤文前锋戴维。 斯基拉在个人社媒写道:维拉和赫尔城均有意租借戴维,这位加拿大前锋将维拉视为首选,预计未来几天将与尤文展开直接谈判。 戴维现年26岁,去年夏天自由身加盟尤文,合同至2030年,他上赛季为球队出战46次并贡献8球5助攻,德转身价3000万欧。

13 Aug 2026, 10:23 UTC328 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

【队史标王!官方:赫尔城签下巴列卡诺后卫门迪】 今日,英超升班马赫尔城官方宣布,21岁巴列卡诺后卫门迪加盟球队,双方签约至2031年,还附有一年选项。 此前,据罗马诺报道,该笔交易的转会费为2500万欧元,这也打破了赫尔城队史引援转会费纪录。 官方公告 赫尔城很高兴宣布,从西甲巴列卡诺签下塞内加尔国脚诺贝尔·门迪,转会费未公开,创下队史纪录。 这名21岁球员签下一份至2031年夏的五年合同,俱乐部附带一年续约选择权。 门迪现年21岁,德转身价为750万欧,上赛季他代表巴列卡诺共出场28次,打入2球。

13 Aug 2026, 05:34 UTC332 viewsread 14 August 2026
Video

【精英友谊赛 阿森纳 1-1 科莫(点球 4-3)精彩集锦】

12 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC371 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

【HWG!罗马诺:26岁弗拉霍维奇加盟土超贝西克塔斯,签约至2029年】 罗马诺用标志性的“Here we go”宣布,26岁前锋弗拉霍维奇加盟土超贝西克塔斯,双方签约至2029年。 罗马诺:Here we go!贝西克塔斯原则上就签下弗拉霍维奇达成协议。 双方已就一份有效期至2029年6月的合同达成一致,弗拉霍维奇将于今天晚些时候飞赴伊斯坦布尔接受体检并完成签约。 弗拉霍维奇现年26岁,他与尤文图斯的合同已于今年6月到期。弗拉霍维奇2022年夏天以8540万欧的转会费,从佛罗伦萨转会加盟尤文。

12 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC340 viewsread 14 August 2026
Video

【南美洲球会杯 博卡青年 3-1 雷科莱塔 精彩集锦】

12 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC351 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

8.12 晚场推荐 001 欧超杯 巴黎圣日耳曼VS阿斯顿维拉 竞彩推荐:胜 app推荐:巴黎-0.5/1 比分推荐:2-0 2-1 3-1 002 解放者杯 普拉滕斯VS科金博联 竞彩推荐:胜 app推荐:普拉滕斯-0.5 比分推荐:2-1 1-0 2-0 003 解放者杯 帕梅拉斯VS波特诺 竞彩推荐:让胜 app推荐:帕梅拉斯-1/1.5 重❤️❤️ 比分推荐:3-0 3-1 4-1 ➡ 加入红单研讨群 @ac99333 👈 😂😂😂跟车链接: 人民币存取😂 xc0066.vip 虚拟币存取😂 jnh707.cc

12 Aug 2026, 11:55 UTC265 viewsread 14 August 2026
Poll

五大联赛即将开始 清选择你的主战场

  1. 西班牙甲级联赛😏43%
  2. 法国甲级联赛😏14%
  3. 德国甲级联赛😏33%
  4. 意大利甲级联赛😏19%
  5. 英格兰超级联赛😏52%

The shares total 161%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

12 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC251 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

【斯基拉:尤文今天会面铃木彩艳经纪人,尝试说服球员租借加盟】 据记者斯基拉消息,尤文将尝试说服铃木彩艳租借加盟。 知名记者罗马诺以标志性的“Here we go”确认,巴黎圣日耳曼将签下效力于帕尔马的23岁日本门将铃木彩艳,转会费3500万欧元。 斯基拉在个人社媒写道:尤文今天将与铃木彩艳经纪人会面,尝试说服他和球员本人同意从巴黎租借尤文一个赛季。巴黎对此持开放态度,现在轮到球员方面做决定了。

12 Aug 2026, 11:38 UTC214 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

【罗马诺:巴洛贡转会热刺没有进展,加拉塔萨雷对他感兴趣】 据知名记者罗马诺报道,巴洛贡转会热刺并没有任何进展。 此前有媒体称热刺有意引进摩纳哥前锋巴洛贡,但罗马诺指出,巴洛贡转会热刺没有任何进展。 目前巴洛贡在英超有一些下家选择,但热刺并不在其中,加拉塔萨雷也对他感兴趣,但现阶段在经济上达成协议并不容易,后续情况发展仍需观察。巴洛贡确实有一些转会动态,但目前并不涉及热刺。

12 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC192 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

【沙特媒体:C罗周二完婚,并将缺席利雅得胜利新赛季前两场比赛】 据沙特媒体《利雅得报》报道,利雅得胜利当家球星C罗在当地时间周二与妻子乔治娜完婚。 据消息人士透露,C罗将缺席利雅得胜利新赛季的前两场比赛,分别是对阵哈萨征服的沙特联赛揭幕战和对阵沙特超升班马的迪里耶的沙王冠比赛。 这两场比赛都将在利雅得当地举行,但C罗由于参加世界杯后的休假错过了利雅得胜利的季前训练,因此他将会缺席这两场比赛。

Showing the 12 most recent of 78 posts we hold for @TIYU83. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Aug 2026, 11:55 UTCAnonymous Poll21 voters

五大联赛即将开始 清选择你的主战场

  1. 西班牙甲级联赛😏43%
  2. 法国甲级联赛😏14%
  3. 德国甲级联赛😏33%
  4. 意大利甲级联赛😏19%
  5. 英格兰超级联赛😏52%

The shares total 161%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 79,477 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“欧冠 五大联赛 NBA 专业竞彩计划” (@TIYU83), 30,619 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TIYU83.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.