Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🎬АЛМАЗ ГЕРОЯ🎬

Channel

🎬АЛМАЗ ГЕРОЯ🎬

@TILKIN_SCREENWRITING

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

384subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002432519309
TypeChannel
Username@TILKIN_SCREENWRITING
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TILKIN_SCREENWRITING

Growth

3823843837 August 2026 — 382 subscribers8 August 2026 — 382 subscribers15 August 2026 — 384 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 382–384 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 16:56384+2
8 Aug 2026, 06:05382no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:00382first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 26 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.6%
avg views ÷ 384 subscribers
Avg views / post
114
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held16 (26 April 20266 August 2026)
Views total341
Reactions total41
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

189 reactions across 15 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6132.3%
🔥4021.2%
👍3216.9%
😁189.52%
🤣147.41%
👏94.76%
❤‍🔥73.70%
21.06%
10.529%
👻10.529%
💯10.529%
🗿10.529%
😭10.529%
🤝10.529%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 189reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 26 April 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 14:58 UTC76 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @agency_a_plusPhoto

«Мы рассказываем свою историю: то, во что мы влюбились в книге». Почему одни экранизации становятся самостоятельными произведениями, а другие остаются лишь иллюстрацией к роману? Что именно сценарист переносит на экран — сюжет, героев, эпоху или собственное впечатление от прочитанного? Об этом — большое интервью с нашим автором Ильей Тилькиным в журнале «Киносценарий». Автор экранизаций «Тихого Дона», «Ненастья»,

🔥72❤‍🔥2👍1

4 Aug 2026, 11:28 UTC119 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Всего через полгода после"Пенисгейта" в чарты самых тупых спортивных скандалов вырвалось вот это. Вкратце: вышла статья о том, что некоторые команды подозревают использование дополнительной набивки в спортивных бюстгальтерах во время индивидуальных гонок на время для улучшения аэродинамики. Согласно публикации: команды попросили UCI проводить проверки спортсменок; речь идёт о возможной набивке бюстгальтеров или прос

🔥1😁1

3 Aug 2026, 10:52 UTC146 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вышел из сумрака. Сдал первый драфт нового проекта, который буду шоуранить. Снял две короткометражки как режиссер. Слетал в несколько стран и собираюсь еще: предстоит рабочая вылазка в Европу, за ней сразу командировка на Тихий океан. А потом еще Чёрное море. И все по делам, по работе, по необходимости. И все это, как у Пастернака - «быстрый промельк маховой». А когда-то я был человеком, который ездил в отпуск. План

15👍6🔥5👻1

22 Jun 2026, 12:02 UTC354 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Это прекрасно. Смотрю последний сезон Fauda, в нужных местах нервничаю, в нужных умиляюсь. И вдруг чего-то ржу. Те, кто хоть раз водил в Израиле, поймут. Умелые израильские спецназовцы ведут слежку за плохим парнем, осторожно следуя за ним по улицам Марселя. По ходу дела один говорит другому: Дорон, держи дистанцию, а то он нас засечет. Они продолжают ехать по улицам Марселя и тут уже я засекаю, что тот, кого они пр

8😁3👏2🔥1

19 May 2026, 12:10 UTC411 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Возвращаясь к теме сценарного ресерча, вспоминаю, сколько времени я рылся в архивах, чтобы изучить подробности быта Гриневых. Как старался точнее описать их усадьбу, убранство барского дома. Цитирую свои заметки: «Дом Гриневых — это практичное жилище в глубокой провинции. Пол: широкие крашеные или скобленые доски. Мебель: добротные, массивные столы и стулья работы местного деревенского столяра. Окна: небольшие, чтоб

👍9🤣42😭1

19 May 2026, 10:53 UTC288 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @kinopoisk_soonPhoto

Сергей Безруков сыграет в драме «Капитанская дочка» — экранизации одноименной повести Александра Пушкина. Он исполнит роль Андрея Петровича Гринева — отца главного героя Петра. Ранее было объявлено, что самого Гринева сыграет Олег Савостюк, а роли Маши и Емельяна Пугачева исполнят Евгения Леонова и Евгений Ткачук. Съемки фильма уже начались. Режиссером выступает Дмитрий Литвиненко. 🗞 «Кинопоиск | Новости»

4🔥4

15 May 2026, 17:57 UTC294 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @mikewasherePhoto

Александр Володин однажды сказал студентам во ВГИКе: «Запомните, всем зрителям на планете интересно только одно – почему Анна любит Петра, беременна от Федора, а вышла замуж за Ивана. Задумывая любой сценарий, располагайте свои размышления о мире вокруг именно этой схемы». Все же спорный тезис. Но смысл ясен.

🔥9521💯1🗿1

15 May 2026, 16:43 UTC262 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Победил вариант "никакая".

😁8

15 May 2026, 12:53 UTC262 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

какая реакция будет?

  1. Простите, на ходу писал, сейчас все подробно напишу38%
  2. Высокомерная скотина, урод10%
  3. М-да ЧСВ зашкаливает прост8%
  4. То есть если не сразу про деньги то можно хамить?10%
  5. никакая, ответа не будет54%

The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

15 May 2026, 12:50 UTC248 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Эксперимент. Получил сообщение, ответил. Как думаете, какова будет реакция?

1

14 May 2026, 09:54 UTC230 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @dreamonspec

Академия российского телевидения объявила номинантов на премию «ТЭФИ» (заглавными буквами, потому что это аббревиатура от – вы не поверите – «телевизионный эфир»). В сценарной номинации выдвинуты: → Елена Киселева, Андрей Кончаловский «Хроники русской революции» → Петр Тодоровский, Иван Баранов «Подслушано в Рыбинске» → Игорь Прокопенко, Дмитрий Новоселов «Дорогой Вилли» → Дарья Сойфер, Елена Минервина, Анжела Боск

12❤‍🔥5👏5🔥1

30 Apr 2026, 15:30 UTC327 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Помните историю про спор Феллини и Гуэрры о сценарии на 10 секунд? Так вот, оказывается, есть целый фестиваль фильмов длиной в СЕМЬ секунд. Может податься любой, снять на телефон и стать знаменитым. У меня такое кино есть, подумываю, не прославиться ли...

🔥10👍31🤝1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @TILKIN_SCREENWRITING. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 May 2026, 12:53 UTCAnonymous Poll39 voters

какая реакция будет?

  1. Простите, на ходу писал, сейчас все подробно напишу38%
  2. Высокомерная скотина, урод10%
  3. М-да ЧСВ зашкаливает прост8%
  4. То есть если не сразу про деньги то можно хамить?10%
  5. никакая, ответа не будет54%

The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

29 Apr 2026, 15:16 UTCAnonymous Poll34 voters

Вопрос подписчикам. Что, если Тилькин без спроса использует мои имя и фамилию для своего персонажа?

  1. Я против!6%
  2. Я не против!59%
  3. Безразлично: все равно никто не увидит!3%
  4. Подам в суд!3%
  5. Попрошу денег!9%
  6. Сам приплачу!15%
  7. Кто такой Тилькин?15%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 26 April 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,321,643 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🎬АЛМАЗ ГЕРОЯ🎬” (@TILKIN_SCREENWRITING), 384 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TILKIN_SCREENWRITING.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.