Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ㅤ* 🖤 ៸ 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗪𝖤𝖤𝖪𝖭𝖣 𝗗𝖠𝖨𝖫𝖸.

@THWEEKNZD

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

238subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001975076496
TypeChannel
Username@THWEEKNZD
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/THWEEKNZD

Growth

23811 Aug 2026, 23:16 — 238 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 13:14 — 238 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 23:1612 Aug 2026, 13:14
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 237–239 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 13:14238no change
11 Aug 2026, 23:16238first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 1 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 56s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

73 reactions across 5 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🏆1317.8%
1216.4%
🍾1013.7%
🎉811.0%
💘811.0%
🔥68.22%
🤩68.22%
❤‍🔥34.11%
🥰34.11%
👏22.74%
💋11.37%
💯11.37%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 1 February 2025 to 7 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Feb 2025, 01:12 UTC≈4,150 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

⠀ ⠀ ⠀ 𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝐦𝖺𝗌𝗍︭𝖾𝗋 🏁 𝘃𝗶𝝰 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝐭𝖺𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝗺𝗲𝗱𝗶𝝰 · 𝗇𝖾𝗐 𝘂𝗽𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗲𝘀. ⠀⠀ ⠀ 𝖥𝖾𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗁𝗍 𝗅𝗂𝗄𝖾 𝗁𝗈𝗆𝖾 ~ 🏁 𝐟𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺𝗋𝗂 𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖻𝗈𝗒 · 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝘁𝘆𝖿𝗈︩︪𝗎𝗋. ⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀

🏆4🍾2🔥2🥰21

6 Feb 2025, 02:51 UTC≈2,910 viewsread 11 August 2026
Video

ᅟᅟㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ﹫𝖼𝗁︩︪︩𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗈𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗽𝗵𝗲𝗿 ٫ 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗋𝗂𝗌 𝗴𝗼𝗲𝗯𝗲𝗹 : 𝒅𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝒘𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝒅𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘮𝘴 𝒕𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝒇𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝗌𝖾 𝗏𝗈𝖼𝖾̂ 𝗃𝖺́ 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗎 𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝗌𝗁𝗈𝗐 𝗈𝗎 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝗉𝖾 𝗂𝖼𝗈̂𝗇𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖾 𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗎 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖿𝗂𝖺, 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗎 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗍𝗋𝖺́𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈! 𝗌𝗈𝗎 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗋𝗂𝗌 𝗀𝗈𝖾𝖻𝖾𝗅, 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗈́𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖿𝖺, 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝖾 𝖽

4 Feb 2025, 01:34 UTC≈1,940 views29 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

ᅟㅤ ᅟㅤ .𝄒 𝗛𝖴𝖱𝖱𝖸 𝗨𝗣 𝗧𝖮𝖬𝖮𝖱𝖱︩︪︩𝖮𝖶 ᅟㅤ ، ®﹡ׂ 𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖻𝗈𝗒 ’𝓼 𝗇𝖾𝗐 𝗆𝗈𝗏𝗂𝖾 ᅟㅤ 𝓽 ٬ 𝗐𝗁𝗒 𝗐𝗈𝗇’𝗍 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝗅𝖾𝗍 𝗆𝖾 𝗀𝗈. ᅟㅤ

🏆5🤩5🍾4🎉4💘4❤‍🔥31💯1

4 Feb 2025, 00:15 UTC≈1,970 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @thgrammyrpVideo

⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ 𝓖𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗺𝘆 𝓐𝗰𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗺𝘆 🌨️ ˖ ˖ 🌨️ ᴜᴘᴅᴀᴛᴇsㅤ𝒃𝐲.ㅤ𝓫𝗶𝗹𝗹𝘀 𝙼𝙰𝚁𝙸𝙰 𝙱𝙴𝙲𝙴𝚁𝚁𝙰 𝚂𝙰𝙱𝚁𝙸𝙽𝙰 𝙲𝙰𝚁𝙿𝙴𝙽𝚃𝙴𝚁 𝙼𝙰𝙳𝙸𝚂𝙾𝙽 𝙱𝙴𝙴𝚁 𝙳𝚄𝙰 𝙻𝙸𝙿𝙰 𝚃𝙷𝙴 𝙳𝚁𝙸𝚅𝙴𝚁 𝙴𝚁𝙰 𝚃𝙷𝙴 𝚆𝙴𝙴𝙺𝙽𝙳 & 𝙰𝙽𝙸𝚃𝚃𝙰 𝙰𝚁𝙸𝙰𝙽𝙰 𝙶𝚁𝙰𝙽𝙳𝙴 𝙺𝙰𝚃𝚈 𝙿𝙴𝚁𝚁𝚈 ⓒ . . ﹫𝓉𝗁𝗓𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗅

3 Feb 2025, 23:13 UTC≈1,720 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @thgrammyrpVideo

⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ 𝓖𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗺𝘆 𝓐𝗰𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗺𝘆 🌨️ ˖ ˖ 🌨️ ᴜᴘᴅᴀᴛᴇsㅤ𝒃𝐲.ㅤ𝓫𝗶𝗹𝗹𝘀 𝙰𝚁𝙸𝙰𝙽𝙰 𝙶𝚁𝙰𝙽𝙳𝙴 𝙼𝙴𝙶𝙰𝙽 𝚃𝙷𝙴𝙴 𝚂𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙻𝙸𝙾𝙽 𝚁𝙰𝚅𝙴𝙽 𝚁𝙴𝙴𝙳 𝙳𝚄𝙰 𝙻𝙸𝙿𝙰 𝙱𝙰𝙳 𝙶𝚈𝙰𝙻 𝙰𝙽𝙸𝚃𝚃𝙰 𝙱𝙴𝚈𝙾𝙽𝙲𝙴́ 𝚃𝙷𝙴 𝚆𝙴𝙴𝙺𝙽𝙳 & 𝙿𝙻𝙰𝚈𝙱𝙾𝙸 𝙲𝙰𝚁𝚃𝙸 ⓒ . . ﹫𝓉𝗁𝗓𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗅

3 Feb 2025, 03:18 UTC≈1,380 views24 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

⠀⠀ ⠀ ✦ ֗ ! 𝗚𝗥𝗔𝗠𝗠𝗬 𝗧𝗜𝗠𝗘. * 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖻𝗂𝗀𝗀𝖾𝗌𝗍 𝗌𝗎𝗋𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖾 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘄 ⸝ ⸝⠀⠀ ⠀ 𝖳𝗁𝖾 𝖶𝖾𝖾𝗄𝗇𝖽 𝗐𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝗋𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝗍𝗈𝗇𝗂𝗀𝗁𝗍 𝖺𝖿𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗆𝖺𝗄𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗉𝖾𝖺𝖼𝖾 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗒. "𝖨n 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍 𝗒𝖾𝖺𝗋𝗌, 𝗐𝖾 𝗁𝖺𝗏𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖾𝖽, 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝖾𝖽 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗇𝗀𝖾𝖽". ㅤㅤㅤⓒ 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗅𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝖼𝗅𝗎𝖻, 𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖻𝗈𝗒.

6🍾4🎉4🏆4💘4💋1🤩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @THWEEKNZD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,011,037 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ㅤ* 🖤 ៸ 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗪𝖤𝖤𝖪𝖭𝖣 𝗗𝖠𝖨𝖫𝖸.” (@THWEEKNZD), 238 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/THWEEKNZD.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.