Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

小蜜蜂业务频道

@TGxiaomifeng

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

267subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003951246423
TypeChannel
Username@TGxiaomifeng
Created23 April 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TGxiaomifeng

Growth

260267263.57 Aug 2026, 21:19 — 260 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 09:05 — 260 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 10:36 — 267 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 21:198 Aug 2026, 10:36
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 259–268 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 10:36267+7
8 Aug 2026, 09:05260no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:19260first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 23 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

66 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👎66100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2026 to 9 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Jun 2026, 08:05 UTC734 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

+1周会员老号 会用的一直在打 不会用的上去就死 稳定耐操 大量现货!!!! @vip_xmf

👎34

1 Jun 2026, 12:11 UTC774 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

!!!注意被骗 认准 @vip_xmf

👎32

20 May 2026, 07:31 UTC672 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚀 8个号,47万群发数量,还在继续挑战极限 @vip_xmf

19 May 2026, 13:28 UTC630 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

机器人店铺新增一项功能,此功能是近期掉设备导致协议失效无法再次使用,可以上传手机号再次生成新的设备。(只针对4月20之后购买的账号) 如有4月20号之前设备失效或者私下购买的账号,请联系客服。 另外:库存已充足,如有需要请下单。感谢大家支持~!后续将继续开发更方便大家的功能。请各位提更好的建议。 @xiaomifenglaohaobot

12 May 2026, 13:15 UTC522 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

客户反馈质量邦邦硬 大量有货 需要的老板联系 @jcd000

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @TGxiaomifeng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 680,539 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“小蜜蜂业务频道” (@TGxiaomifeng), 267 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TGxiaomifeng.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.