U换地址了,原来的地址不能用,不要直接转,通知后转错不补❗❗❗ 唯一购卡客服: @xianyu53 唯一购卡客服: @xianyu53

Channel
闲鱼充值卡/灰产赚钱/偏门副业
@TGxianyujz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
63subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001729112034 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TGxianyujz |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 23 January 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TGxianyujz |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 17:19 | 63 | -3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 66 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:00 | 69 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:49 | 69 | first reading |
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 23 January 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 April 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2s
- Average length
- 2s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
停了一段时间,现在卡源充足,拿卡的私,量大优先!!! 唯一购卡客服: @xianyu53 唯一购卡客服: @xianyu53
哪有什么先发卡的好事儿,只是接着这个噱头,再骗你花钱充值,交押金。还有什么给了钱,不给卡,另外要开什么账户的,都是骗人的,钱到发卡,其他什么流程都没有。 我在频道里说了,不从我这拿卡没事儿,先看看曝光的这些,避免被骗。 唯一购卡客服 : @xianyu53 唯一购卡客服 : @xianyu53
没发动态,不是不在,一直在线,拿卡的私❗❗❗ 唯一购卡客服 : @xianyu53 唯一购卡客服 : @xianyu53
一直在线,拿卡私,目前以这个价格表为准❗❗❗ 唯一购卡客服: @xianyu53 唯一购卡客服: @xianyu53
📣📣📣 现拿卡每15张送一张卡,量大优惠多,多拿多送,拿卡的抓紧时间,活动截止时间另行通知❗️❗️❗️ 唯一购卡客服:@xianyu53 唯一购卡客服:@xianyu53
⚠️⚠️⚠️ 拿多少卡给多少钱,没有什么开户这一说,这种第一次要你开户,开户要几百u的都是骗子,先把你钱收了,不给你卡密,让你再给钱开户才能拿卡密的,纯粹就是骗人,为了就是想骗你更多的钱❗❗ 唯一购卡客服 : @xianyu53 唯一购卡客服 : @xianyu53
⚠️⚠️⚠️ 频道里公布的骗人的频道,遇到这种直接骂就行了,说什么做了多少年,是骗了多少年才是,有的人非听这种鬼话,还是上当了吧。从不从我这拿卡没事儿,但是先看看,别遇到这些被人骗,就不值当了❗❗❗ 自动发卡全都是骗人的,点了购买只会有更多的套路在等着你们❗❗❗ 唯一购卡客服 : @xianyu53 唯一购卡客服 : @xianyu53
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @TGxianyujz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@TGxianyujz named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 8 posts, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“闲鱼充值卡/灰产赚钱/偏门副业” (@TGxianyujz), 63 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TGxianyujz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.