Channel
@TG_NFT_N3WS
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
38subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002459125872 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TG_NFT_N3WS |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TG_NFT_N3WS |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:56 | 38 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 39 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 39 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
43 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 26 | 60.5% | |
| 🤣 | 9 | 20.9% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 11.6% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 2.33% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 2.33% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 2.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2025 to 10 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Фондовый рынок США обвалился на $1,65 трлн после заявления Трампа о новых пошлинах против Китая. На фоне паники просела и крипта — биткоин рухнул до 108 тысяч.
Signed Сергей
Вышли новые улучшения!!! 🎁 - can be upgraded to NFT 🎁 - can be upgraded to NFT 🎁 - can be upgraded to NFT 🎁 - can be upgraded to NFT ❤️ - Если есть такие подарки GIFT NEWS🎁 Portals❤️ Tonnel Market🌪 THERMOS⭐️
❤2
Signed mnnkkkk
🐣Подаркам с пингвинами все-таки быть? 🗞В своем интервью, Pudgy Penguins подтвердили, что в их планах есть выпуск Telegram подарков в скором времени. Получается ждём? 👄 ❤️ - Конечно, имбище! 😁 - Нахуй надо. GIFT NEWS🎁 Portals❤️ Tonnel Market🌪 THERMOS⭐️
❤7🤣4👍1🔥1
Signed mnnkkkk
Подарки то потихоньку восстанавливаются 🚀 Вы закупались чем то? GIFT NEWS🎁 Portals❤️ Tonnel Market🌪 THERMOS⭐️
❤1
Signed mnnkkkk
📞 Анонимный номер +888 8 898 купили за 117,000 TON ($417,000) или за 33 миллиона рублей... Врятли он сделает х2 когда нибудь, падение в 2 раза более вероятно👍 Хорошее вложение ?🔛 ❤️-да 😭-нет GIFT NEWS🎁 Portals❤️ Tonnel Market🌪 THERMOS⭐️
🤣1
Signed mnnkkkk
ДУРОВ ВОССТАНОВИЛСЯ! Дуров снова в сети. Выходит, ни о какой безвозвратности речи не идёт. Приватность? Обещания? Всё это — просто слова. Telegram подорвал свои же основы. Если аккаунт можно "вернуть", значит конфиденциальность — фейк. Если, конечно же, это было действительно удаление, а не обычная заморозка.
Signed Сергей
Павлу Дурову снесли аккаунт Думаю создателю телеграмма снести аккаунт невозможно,скорее всего он тестит что-то -Plush pepe #1
Signed Сергей
Новые подарки уже в августе 🎁🎁 То, что подарки нас ждут в этом месяце - совершенно точно. Помимо этого, у нас есть две даты 8 и 14 августа. Вторая дата - это «День рождения Телеграм». Такую дату точно разработчики не упустят. Жми ❤️если ждешь подарки! 😂Или если нет )) GIFT NEWS🎁 Portals❤️ Tonnel Market🌪 THERMOS⭐️
🤬1
Signed mnnkkkk
🤯 ПОДАРКАМ ОЧЕНЬ ПЛОХО! Практически каждая коллекция за месяц упала от 35% до 50%, рынок подарков потерпел крушение. Все это чудо, случилось из-за коллаборации с Snoop Dogg, за $12 000 000 убили весь рынок! 👄 GIFT NEWS🎁 Portals❤️ Tonnel Market🌪 THERMOS⭐️
Signed mnnkkkk
Рынок стоит на месте, ничего интересного, немного отрастают подарки Снупа🎁 Лидеры роста: 🛍Swag Bag +20% 🚘Low Rider +15% 🐶Snoop Dog +15% 🎁Tama Gadget +12% 🎁Holiday Drink +12% GIFT NEWS🎁 Portals❤️ Tonnel Market🌪 THERMOS⭐️
❤1
Signed mnnkkkk
Лопнувший пузырь или возможность? 🤔 Сегодня ночью случился один из самых сильных проливов в подарках! 95% позиций в красной зоне! 🫡 - Сливайте, глупцы! ❤️ - НОЛЬ ТРЯСКИ! ПАМП СКОРО! 🔴 Бесплатные раздачи ➡️ @crypto_razdacha1 🔴 Лудка НФТ ➡️ @crypto_ludkaNFT GIFT NEWS🎁 Portals❤️ Tonnel Market🌪 THERMOS⭐️
❤2
Signed mnnkkkk
🎁 СНУП ДОГА УЖЕ НАЧАЛИ ПАМПИТЬ! Буквально за полчаса машины Снуп Дога выросли на 26% и теперь торгуются по 35 TON (120$). 🎁 🔴 Бесплатные раздачи ➡️ @crypto_razdacha1 🔴 Лудка НФТ ➡️ @crypto_ludkaNFT GIFT NEWS🎁 Portals❤️ Tonnel Market🌪 THERMOS⭐️
❤1
Signed mnnkkkk
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TG_NFT_N3WS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 905,691 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“News Telegram|NFT|Новости Тон” (@TG_NFT_N3WS), 38 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TG_NFT_N3WS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.