27 Mar 2025, 14:41 UTC672 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
🧧最牛红包扫雷群24小时高速发车中🧧喜欢玩的朋友速进群抢红包🧧群链接：https://t.me/fudihi619hviv 在线客服认准 唯一：@guydihnvj9
Channel
🧧USDT红包扫雷TG群- 【福619娱乐城】🧧
@TGLeeTronBot
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
10subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002658196408 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TGLeeTronBot |
| Created | 24 March 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TGLeeTronBot |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 10 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:49 | 10 | first reading |
Engagement
4 posts held, back to 24 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Links
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2025 to 27 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
24 Mar 2025, 20:11 UTC674 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
*福619娱乐城USDT红包扫雷 玩法说明* 1️⃣无需注册，上分即可开始游戏，发红包或抢红包 2️⃣公群限注5U-1000U🧧 3️⃣由玩家发送发包指令，红包机器人在群内按指令发包，指令为[10-5]（机器人发送金额为 10 的红包，雷值为 5，红包数量固定6个，抢包者抢到金额的尾数是5的即中雷； 5️⃣用户中雷后需赔付发包者金额1.8倍即18 6️⃣雷值可设置0-9的任意一个数 7️⃣平台方不参与玩家的游戏盈利，全凭玩家对赌 8️⃣玩家发送指令: 10/5或者10-5即可发包，表示金额是10，抢包者红包金额尾数为5则中雷，红包数量固定6个 9️⃣玩家可以通过向机器人发送指令查询自己的余额资金明细信息 10：充值提现联系机器人自动完成，通过相关指令和提示步骤操作，切勿相信他人私下上分下分，以防上当受骗 11：联系机器人获取专属链接,用户通过链接加入后绑定即可成为下级用户 🔗福619娱乐城公群:👮♀️ht…
❤1
24 Mar 2025, 20:10 UTCviews —
Channel photo updated
24 Mar 2025, 20:00 UTCviews —
Channel created
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @TGLeeTronBot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 205,902 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@TGLeeTronBot named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@jopvhcdywrs619
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🧧USDT红包扫雷TG群- 【福619娱乐城】🧧” (@TGLeeTronBot), 10 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TGLeeTronBot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.