Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Проект Multi Bear Bot 🥳

Channel

Проект Multi Bear Bot 🥳

@TGK_MultiBear_Bot

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003105709973
TypeChannel
Username@TGK_MultiBear_Bot
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TGK_MultiBear_Bot

Growth

1113128 August 2026 — 11 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13 subscribers8 August 202625 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11–13 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 06:4213+1
17 Aug 2026, 15:3812+1
12 Aug 2026, 08:1511no change
8 Aug 2026, 12:0311first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
140.4%
avg views ÷ 13 subscribers
Avg views / post
18.3
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
4
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held19 (12 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total73
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TGK_MultiBear_Bot. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 19:26 UTC10 viewsread 12 August 2026

🚀 ЗАПУСТИЛ ДВУХ БОТОВ Короче, два бота запущены и работают (@MultiBear_Bot, @MultiBearBot). 🤖 Можете пока поиграться, потестить, поискать баги. 🔍 Если что найдёте — пишите, будем фиксить. 🛠️ @Giveaway696969

3 Aug 2026, 10:42 UTC24 viewsread 12 August 2026

🐻‍❄️ БОТ ОБНОВЛЁН! НОВЫЕ ФУНКЦИИ! 🚀 Друзья, мы снова обновили нашего бота @MultiBear_Bot! Теперь он стал ещё удобнее и мощнее: --- 📤 1. КОМАНДА /send С КНОПКАМИ Теперь ты можешь отправить сообщение в любой чат через бота! Как это работает: 1. Пишешь в ЛС бота: /send Твой текст 2. Бот показывает список чатов кнопками 3. Выбираешь чат — сообщение улетает туда! Пример: /send Всем привет! Завтра встреча в 20:00 →

2 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC23 viewsread 12 August 2026

🐻‍❄️ БОТ ОБНОВЛЁН! НОВЫЕ ФУНКЦИИ! 🚀 Друзья, мы обновили нашего бота @MultiBear_Bot! Теперь он стал ещё удобнее и полезнее: --- 🔄 1. АВТОМАТИЧЕСКАЯ ПЕРЕСЫЛКА ПОСТОВ Все новые посты из наших каналов: • @Multi_Bear • @Cringe_Multi_Bear • @TGK_MultiBear_Bot • @Mu1ti_Bear автоматически появляются в твоём чате! --- ✍️ 2. РУЧНАЯ ОТПРАВКА ИЗ ЛИЧКИ Владелец бота (@Giveaway696969) теперь может отправлять срочные сообщен

2 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC16 viewsread 12 August 2026

Посоветуйте пожалуйста нейронку. Либо же есть ли те кто занимается дизайном?)

28 Jul 2026, 19:13 UTC19 viewsread 12 August 2026

📢 ВНИМАНИЕ! НОВЫЙ КОД БОТА ЗАПУЩЕН! 🚀 Привет, дорогие подписчики! 🤗 Мы запустили нового бота для автоматической пересылки постов из наших каналов! 🐻 Что делает бот? ➡️ Автоматически пересылает новые посты из: • @Multi_Bear • @Cringe_Multi_Bear • @TGK_MultiBear_Bot • @Mu1ti_Bear во все чаты и группы, где он добавлен! 🤖 Как добавить бота в свой чат? 1️⃣ Найди бота: @MultiBear_Bot 2️⃣ Добавь его в чат как администр

26 Jul 2026, 18:36 UTC2 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Cringe_Multi_BearPhoto

📢 КАК Я ПОЛУЧИЛ РАЗБАН ДВУХ АККАУНТОВ — ПОДРОБНО Под моим постом «Ура! Перманентный бан в бот Леся успешно сняли 🔥» начали писать «насосал» и прочее. А Марк ещё за пару дней до разбана говорил «наныл Егору». Объясняю как всё было на самом деле. ЧТО СЛУЧИЛОСЬ 25 мая я получил перманентный бан на 4-5 аккаунтах. На двух основных — фулл донат-статусы, на остальных тоже были донатки, но не полные. Конкретная причина ба

24 Jul 2026, 17:40 UTC27 viewsread 12 August 2026

🌐 НАШИ ЧАТЫ MULTIBEAR 🐵 Дабл Горилла: https://t.me/+FvKIroVlMpEzMzFi 🏆 Тотем 50 уровень: https://t.me/Chat_Mu1ti_Bear https://t.me/+TOT5oYUcCuxiZGQy 💬 Чат общения: https://t.me/Chat_Multi_Bear 📢 Чат новостей проекта: https://t.me/Chat_CringeMulti_Bear 🤖 Бот: @MultiBearBot, @MultiBear_Bot, @MultiBearCartelBot 😄 👑 Владелец: @Giveaway696969

23 Jul 2026, 12:12 UTC29 viewsread 12 August 2026

🆘 ПОМОЩЬ В РАЗРАБОТКЕ БОТА Привет! Я развиваю бота MultiBear и ищу помощь: 🔹 Что нужно: - Идеи по улучшению бота - Помощь в тестировании новых фич - Обратная связь по работе бота - Предложения по экономике и магазину - Помощь с AI-модератором (Gemini) 🔹 Что уже есть: - Казино, банк, переводы - AI-модератор - Анти-рейд защита - Запросы валюты - Промокоды - Система ролей 💬 Чат для обсуждения: https://t.me/+wB9k1wHP

21 Jul 2026, 11:43 UTC22 views0 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

🔄 РЕПОСТЫ ИЗ КАНАЛА ЗАПУЩЕНЫ! Теперь каждый пост из @TGK_MultiBear_Bot автоматически пересылается во все зарегистрированные чаты. 📌 КАК ПОДКЛЮЧИТЬ ЧАТ: 1. Добавьте @MultiBearBot в чат 2. Дайте боту права админа 3. Напишите /register_chat 4. Готово! Все посты из канала будут приходить в чат. 📋 ДОСТУПНЫЕ КОМАНДЫ: /register_chat — подключить пересылку /unregister_chat — отключить /chat_list — список чатов (владелец)

21 Jul 2026, 11:31 UTC5 viewsread 12 August 2026

Начинаем мини тест команды "репост"

19 Jul 2026, 14:20 UTC9 viewsread 12 August 2026

БОТ ВРЕМЕННО ВЫКЛЮЧЕН!

Signed Владислав Григель (Зайчик ♥️)

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @TGK_MultiBear_Bot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 837,817 of 1,628,927entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Проект Multi Bear Bot 🥳” (@TGK_MultiBear_Bot), 13 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TGK_MultiBear_Bot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.