Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Cewek Murahan, Agni

@TEILABOFC

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

25subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002010035272
TypeChannel
Username@TEILABOFC
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 2 January 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/TEILABOFC

Growth

257 August 2026 — 25 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24–26 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 10:0125no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:5425first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 January 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 January 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

18 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🖕844.4%
527.8%
👍316.7%
🗿211.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 January 2024 to 5 January 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Jan 2024, 05:39 UTC≈5,380 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

yowes udah minta maaf, walaupun ga gw maapin

🖕4

5 Jan 2024, 05:37 UTC≈5,400 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

gw ga tertarik sama kale kata orang yang udah 2 kali ketauan main sama pacar orang 😭😭 Lo jangan karena udh ketahuan malah Denial Cok, waktu blm ketauan aja ngechat dia minta dia stayy ihhh gimana si

🖕31🗿1

5 Jan 2024, 05:36 UTC≈5,410 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

me : kalian berdua sama sama murah Agni : tapi seengaknya aku orang jujur mengnangisss, jujur kata Lo? Lo udah ada main belakang sama pacar orang lain secara diem diem itu nama nya bukan orang jujur blokkk 😭 iyaa jujur karena udah ketauan, coba kalau belom hahaha kocakk

2🖕1

5 Jan 2024, 05:34 UTC≈4,910 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

aku gak ngerasa pacaran sama kale rubah pikiran goblok Lo itu, orang kalau udah call an, saling pap rl, manggil manggil sayang udah termasuk selingkuh. Lo gada status pacaran karena cuma di jadiin pelarian doang bego

👍3

2 Jan 2024, 16:16 UTC≈3,730 viewsread 11 August 2026

semoga cepet ada itikad baik lo buat minta maaf ke gw

2 Jan 2024, 16:16 UTC≈3,660 viewsread 11 August 2026

dan dia masih sempet nya berlagak cewek baik baik dengan bilang supaya hubungan kami baik baik aja, kalau emng itu harapan Lo, Lo harus nya ga usah datang lagi Agni. apalagi sampai nawarin buat balik begitu ya

2 Jan 2024, 16:14 UTC≈3,510 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

bagi yang ngebela agni gw juga harap buka mata lo.. gw ga mngkn diam aja kan setelah tau selingkuhan pacar gw dlu ngechat kyk gini dan mnta balik?? gak salah kalau gw blg dia murah, jelas jelas udh di buang malah balik ngechat ngechat begini.

2 Jan 2024, 15:50 UTC≈2,820 viewsread 11 August 2026

lu ngatain agni murahan, buka mata lu cowok lu lebih murah ini kata kata yang di ucapin temen Agni, tapi sorry bahkan gw gak perduli mana yang lebih murah, selagi itu bukan diri gw.

2 Jan 2024, 15:48 UTC≈2,690 viewsread 11 August 2026

yang salah dua dua nya, tapi yang di sudutin di ch cma pihak cewek doang. mngkn bakal ada yang berfikiran kyk gini. tapi sorry gw bukan orang yang bego, dan gabisa ngeliat mana yang salah dan mana yang enggak. bagi gw baik kale maupun Agni disini sama sama salah entah mau pihak mana yang memulai. gw ga perduli atas terulang nya kasus ini juga gw ngebuka aib kale tersebut di depan staff inti, gw juga ngebubarin dan

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TEILABOFC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,266,583 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cewek Murahan, Agni” (@TEILABOFC), 25 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TEILABOFC.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.