Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝗧𝗕𝗣𝗡 | 𝗵𝘂𝗯

Channel

𝗧𝗕𝗣𝗡 | 𝗵𝘂𝗯

@TBPN_official

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

873subscribers

-20 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001875342523
TypeChannel
Username@TBPN_official
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded22 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/TBPN_official

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

87389388322 August 2026 — 893 subscribers23 August 2026 — 892 subscribers30 August 2026 — 888 subscribers9 September 2026 — 880 subscribers18 September 2026 — 873 subscribers22 August 202618 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 27 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 870–896 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 16:36873-7
9 Sept 2026, 08:56880-8
30 Aug 2026, 23:28888-4
23 Aug 2026, 19:49892-1
22 Aug 2026, 22:15893first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 25 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

11 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍436.4%
👎327.3%
❤218.2%
🆒218.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 25 March 2026 to 2 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Apr 2026, 08:40 UTC418 viewsread 22 August 2026
Poll

Согласны ли вы с нерфом КВ-4 Турч и Projet Murat?

  1. Да! Танки были достаточно сильными и нуждались в этом.39%
  2. Возможно, но у меня не было с ними проблем.29%
  3. Нет! Оба были в балансе и оправдывали свою цену.32%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed r᥆sіᥒᥲᥒ𝗍

1 Apr 2026, 19:34 UTC408 views2 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Инсайдов больше не будет... Нашего лучшего инсайдера посадили в яму и закопали... Аминь. TBPN.Поскорбеть

👍1👎1

Signed r᥆sіᥒᥲᥒ𝗍

1 Apr 2026, 14:24 UTC370 views3 reactionsread 22 August 2026

У вас рот белый TBPN. Посмеяться

👍3

Signed Маяковский

1 Apr 2026, 08:15 UTC338 views1 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤1

Signed Маяковский

1 Apr 2026, 08:15 UTC305 viewsread 22 August 2026

Итак, после долгого перерыва я вернулся к вам не просто с пост-обзором, а с настоящим рум-туром по настоящей достопримечательности : дому разработчика. Сейчас он трудится на работе, пиздит блогера за бесценок как щенка и заставляет того крутить Конструкторское бюро на СТ-II, так что, пока разработчик не вернулся, рассмотрим поближе его жилище Оборудование тут стандартное, я решил собрать его на точность и маскировку…

Signed Маяковский

1 Apr 2026, 07:58 UTC177 views2 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Это уже началось? Предположительное бронирование bZ-7OV 👀 *бронепробитие 270мм и 340мм TBPN.подписаться

👎2

Signed r᥆sіᥒᥲᥒ𝗍

1 Apr 2026, 07:49 UTC125 viewsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Projet Murat (СТ-10, Франция, коллекционный, резервная гусеница) В спец клиенте получил следующие изменения в ТТХ: 1) Перезарядка орудия с 7.1 до 8.1с🔽 TBPN.подписаться

Signed r᥆sіᥒᥲᥒ𝗍

1 Apr 2026, 07:49 UTC148 views1 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

СТ-II (СССР, ТТ-10, Прокачиваемый, спаренные орудия) В спец клиенте получил следующие изменения в ТТХ: 1) Средний разовый урон с 400 ед. на 420 ед.🔼 2) Перезарядка орудия с 23 на 18с🔼 3) Бронирование щек башни с 91мм изменено на 180мм🔼 TBPN.подписаться

❤1

Signed r᥆sіᥒᥲᥒ𝗍

1 Apr 2026, 07:49 UTC157 viewsread 22 August 2026
Photo

BZT-70 ТЕСТ (ТТ-11, Китай, премиум, резервная гусеница, боевая стабилизация); Сам BZT в клиенте находится уже долгое время, но танку решили добавить клона на 11 уровнем, разница с 10 будет расписана ниже: 1) Уровень изменен с 10 на 11 2) Средний разовый урон базовым снарядом с 850 ед на 950 ед🔼 3) Специальный снаряд КС изменен на совершенно новый тип снарядов, в данный момент он подписан как TEST 4) Средний урон оско…

Signed r᥆sіᥒᥲᥒ𝗍

1 Apr 2026, 07:39 UTC159 views0 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

❗️ Dev клиент был обновлен, что удалось найти: Тестирование Vickers II (ЛТ-10, Великобритания, маскировка в движении, ATGM02, также предположительно будет исследоваться начиная с 9 уровня) ❗️ Ребаланс некоторых машин: Projet Murat СТ-II Vickers MK. 3 Fv215b 183 TVP 50/51 МС-11 ЛВ-1300 Уран МБ-85 Галилей 🆕 Новая техника 11 уровня, пока лишь для внутренних тестов: Ch57_BZT_70_T Пока это все что удалось найти, подроб…

Signed r᥆sіᥒᥲᥒ𝗍

1 Apr 2026, 05:08 UTC115 views2 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🤔Одно из немногих предложений которое можно порекомендовать к покупке. Сама по себе Progetto 46 еще хорошо себя чувствует даже в текущей мете VIII, а учитывая что для текущей политики игры 899р это копейки, то в целом за добротный прем в фулл фарше это действительно хорошая цена. Поинт Сезона. Бешенный ритм - 899р. TBPN.Подписаться

🆒2

Signed r᥆sіᥒᥲᥒ𝗍

31 Mar 2026, 19:42 UTC143 viewsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Уже прошло пару дней с ввода новых двустволок во главе с СТ-II, как они вам? Решились выбивать прем версию? Или ждете пока выйдут в общий доступ? ✏️ TBPN.Подписаться

Signed r᥆sіᥒᥲᥒ𝗍

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @TBPN_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Apr 2026, 08:40 UTCAnonymous Poll69 voters

Согласны ли вы с нерфом КВ-4 Турч и Projet Murat?

  1. Да! Танки были достаточно сильными и нуждались в этом.39%
  2. Возможно, но у меня не было с ними проблем.29%
  3. Нет! Оба были в балансе и оправдывали свою цену.32%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 25 March 2026 to 2 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Just Jokes Classic
@wotblitz · 32,987
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 3 September 2026
Sensei_Says
@sensei_says_tg · 35,662
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 1 September 2026
Mad Maks Blitz
@mad_maks_blitz · 58,082
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 22 August 2026
World of Tanks Blitz
@wotblitzofficiaI · 24,866
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 September 2026
⚡𝐸𝐴𝑆𝑌:𝐵𝐿𝐼𝑇𝑍⚡
@Blitz_678_werty · 42,988
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 28 August 2026
Rofl Blitz
@roflblitz · 35,942
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝗧𝗕𝗣𝗡 | 𝗵𝘂𝗯” (@TBPN_official), 873 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TBPN_official.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.