Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

تحشيش كروي 🇵🇸

@TAHSHISHTR

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

20,500subscribers

-60 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001702103747
TypeChannel
Username@TAHSHISHTR
Description⚽️ افـضـل قـنـاة سـاخـرة كـرويـة ⏰ نــشــرمــتـواصـل يــومــيــاً 🛑 محايدة ولاتنتمي لأي فريق معين للتواصل و الاعلانات: @b_e8o - @Z_F_6
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TAHSHISHTR

Growth

20,50020,56020,5307 August 2026 — 20,560 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,560 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,555 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,550 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,539 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,522 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,520 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,509 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,500 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -60. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,491–20,569 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 04:5720,500-9
13 Aug 2026, 00:3320,509-11
11 Aug 2026, 22:5820,520-2
10 Aug 2026, 19:4820,522-17
9 Aug 2026, 17:4120,539-11
8 Aug 2026, 14:3820,550-5
7 Aug 2026, 14:5020,555-5
7 Aug 2026, 13:1620,560no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:0720,560first reading

Engagement

73 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.51%
avg views ÷ 20,500 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,540
73 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
73
of 73 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held73 (2 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total112,418
Reactions total4,960
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
72,000
Videos
9,930
Links
645

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 43s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,960 reactions across 73 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣4,49090.5%
3016.07%
😁691.39%
😭370.746%
🍌210.423%
🫡80.161%
💔60.121%
🖕60.121%
👀50.101%
🔥50.101%
🤝40.081%
🍓30.06%
👍30.06%
10.02%
❤‍🔥10.02%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 73 of the 73 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,960reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC279 views25 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

هل تعلم أن عدد مرات حظر شات تحشيش كروي أكثر من بلنتيات الهلال مجتمعه ؟ 🤔

🤣232

Signed 𝐅𝐈𝐓 | 𝐎𝐍𝐋𝐘 𝐃𝐎 #عودة_القديم

14 Aug 2026, 18:24 UTC323 views5 reactionsread 14 August 2026

صار خلل بالمناقشة القديمة للقناة، هاي المناقشة الجديدة الكل ينضم https://t.me/TAHSHISHTRG

4🤣1

Signed 𝐊𝐀𝐑𝐑𝐀𝐑 #¹

14 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC379 views27 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

تخيل دول كانوا الكباتن بتوع الفرقة من 3 مواسم ، وكنا متضايقين من اننا بنطلع موسم صفري

🤣27

Signed 𝒆𝒍𝒔𝒂𝒊𝒅 𝒇𝒂𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒚 🇪🇬

14 Aug 2026, 14:23 UTC644 views53 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

بالبلدي كده بيقوله انت شطبت خلاص انما ميسي لازم يفضل مكمل عشان نستمتع اكتر و اكتر

🤣483🍌2

Signed 𝒆𝒍𝒔𝒂𝒊𝒅 𝒇𝒂𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒚 🇪🇬

14 Aug 2026, 13:53 UTC653 views44 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

ياهلا؟

🤣44

Signed 𝐅𝐈𝐓 | 𝐎𝐍𝐋𝐘 𝐃𝐎 #عودة_القديم

14 Aug 2026, 03:03 UTC≈1,050 views69 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

اخر اقوال الشهيد

🤣681

Signed 𝐅𝐈𝐓 | 𝐎𝐍𝐋𝐘 𝐃𝐎 #عودة_القديم

14 Aug 2026, 00:25 UTC≈1,110 views56 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

قنوات الفانتازي تنصحك كل يوم ب لاعب مختلف؟ عندي لك الحل 👆🏻

🤣532😁1

Signed 𝐅𝐈𝐓 | 𝐎𝐍𝐋𝐘 𝐃𝐎 #عودة_القديم

13 Aug 2026, 19:12 UTC≈1,240 views69 reactionsread 14 August 2026

هو احنه في احلام العصر ولا ايه شتيغن و اروخو و توريس برا النادي 🥹

🤣67🖕2

Signed 𝙺𝙰𝙳𝙷𝙸𝙼

13 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC≈1,280 views82 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

هاي اثار الزواج ، والله عدهن سوالف النسوان

🤣802

Signed 𝙺𝙰𝙳𝙷𝙸𝙼

12 Aug 2026, 21:41 UTC≈1,540 views100 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

مهمة فابيان رويز ف الحياة يرفع الألقاب بس

🤣991

Signed 𝐅𝐈𝐓 | 𝐎𝐍𝐋𝐘 𝐃𝐎 #عودة_القديم

12 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC≈1,560 views78 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

رجولة و نخوة مش عند معظم اللاعبين رونالدو يكتفي ب اظهار يد زوجته و عدم اظهار وجهها

🤣762

Signed CR7あCRAZY

12 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC≈1,520 views58 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

كذاب والله المباراة الجايه يسجل هاتريك و 2 اسيست

🤣58

Signed 𝙺𝙰𝙳𝙷𝙸𝙼

Showing the 12 most recent of 73 posts we hold for @TAHSHISHTR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@TAHSHISHTR edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 515,349 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ريال مدريد بالعربي 💯💢
@RealMadrIdArabic18 · 137,631
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 August 2026
OFFSIDE | أخبار الكرة و أهداف
@Offsideahdaff · 148,852
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 12 August 2026
استوديو برشلونة
@Barca_Studio_News · 119,180
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 14 August 2026
𝓷𝓮𝔀𝓼
@newsF9 · 207,874
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 August 2026
بث مباشر مباراة الهلال والفيصلي
@Xz_fn · 127,887
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 13 August 2026
Bein Fantasy - بي ان فانتاسي
@bein_fantasy · 146,262
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“تحشيش كروي 🇵🇸” (@TAHSHISHTR), 20,500 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TAHSHISHTR.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.